1 / 14

Factors Influencing Respondent & Operant Learning: Part 2

Factors Influencing Respondent & Operant Learning: Part 2. Lesson 10. Salience: Operant Learning. S D / S ∆ intensity More noticeable  faster learning S R intensity Magnitude of reinforcement  magnitude  faster learning S R value  value  faster learning

lundy
Télécharger la présentation

Factors Influencing Respondent & Operant Learning: Part 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Factors Influencing Respondent & Operant Learning:Part 2 Lesson 10

  2. Salience: Operant Learning • SD / S∆ intensity • More noticeable  faster learning • SR intensity • Magnitude of reinforcement •  magnitude  faster learning • SR value •  value  faster learning • Can be modified by experience ~

  3. Operant: Delay vs Magnitude • Delay most important factor • Small, immediate reinforcer more powerful… • Than large, delayed reward • Immediate consequences • More closely connected to situation • e.g., hangovers as punishment ~

  4. Salience: CS Intensity Hi stronger CS Asymptote CR weaker CS Lo # of CS - US pairings • CS intensity • ­intensity  ~ Faster conditioning

  5. Salience: CS Intensity • Stimulus millieu • Always multiple potential CSs • Overshadowing • Concurrent cues • TONE/light – shock  pain/fear • TONE  stronger fear • light  weaker fear ~

  6. Salience: US Intensity • Increased intensity • Faster conditioning and… • Stronger CR possible • Raise Asymptote

  7. stronger US Salience: US Intensity Hi Asymptote CR weaker US Lo # of CS - US pairings

  8. Salience & Previous Experience • Surprisingness of US important • Affects rapidity & strength of learning • Novel stimuli best cues • CS+ / CS- and SD / S∆ • Not cues for other • only occur with US/SR ~

  9. Salience & Previous Experience • Latent Inhibition • Slower acquisition if CS is familiar • Cues associated w/ other events • Inhibits association w/ new US/SR • Blocking effect • Tone—shock pain/fear • Tone  fear • Tone/Light – shock  pain/fear • Light  no fear (or weak) • Redundancy ~

  10. Sensory Preconditioning • Conditional Stimuli paired first • no US • many times • Acquisition • one CS is paired with a US • other is not • Extinction of CS paired with US ~

  11. Conditioned Taste Aversion (CTA) • Exception to usual rules of conditioning • Delay can be hours • Requires only single CS-US pairing • Rats: novel food makes them sick • Will avoid that food, even if starving • Adaptive ? • Stewed tomatoes & beef jerky ~

  12. Conditioned Taste Aversions • Learn to avoid foods that make you sick • Eat a novel food • Taste = CS • Become sick • Avoid food • Resistant to extinction • Species specific tendencies • Mammals: Taste cues (CS) • Birds: Visual cues ~

  13. Biological Preparedness • Animals differentially prepared • to associate certain CSs & USs • Highly prepared • learn very quickly • Unprepared • according to general learning laws • Contraprepared • great difficulty, if at all • even w/ appropriate contingencies ~

  14. Stimulus Relevance • Cues relevant for biologically important event • both taste & illness for food • visual cues & painful stimuli • highly-prepared associations • Contra-prepared or unprepared for others • Taste – foot shock • Sound/light -- illness ~

More Related