1 / 18

ASAP: An Adaptive Sampling Approach to Data Collection in Sensor Networks

ASAP: An Adaptive Sampling Approach to Data Collection in Sensor Networks. Bugra Gedik Ling Liu Philip S. Yu IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 2007. Introduction. Sensors are power constrained Event-based data collection Periodic data collection

lydia
Télécharger la présentation

ASAP: An Adaptive Sampling Approach to Data Collection in Sensor Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ASAP: An Adaptive Sampling Approach to Data Collection in Sensor Networks BugraGedik Ling Liu Philip S. Yu IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 2007

  2. Introduction • Sensors are power constrained • Event-based data collection • Periodic data collection • Model-based data collection • Intra-node modeling • Inter-node modeling

  3. System Model (1/2) • Network Architecture • A sensor node , where • Each node only communicates with its neighbors • Sensor nodes use a data collection tree for the purpose of propagating their sensed value to base node • Partition the network into disjoint clusters • Further partitioning each clusterinto subclusters

  4. System Model (2/2)

  5. Sensing-driven Cluster Construction (1/3) • Cluster head selection • Every node is initialized not to be a cluster head and does not have an associated cluster • Head selection probability • Cluster count factor : the average fraction of nodes that will be selected as cluster heads • Relative energy level : energy available at node at time

  6. Sensing-driven Cluster Construction (2/3) • Cluster formation • Message circulation • Cluster head will prepare a message m circulated within a bounded number of hops • stores the shortest hop from to • stores the mean of sensor reading from • Cluster Engagement • Attraction score Hop distance Data distance

  7. Sensing-driven Cluster Construction (3/3) • Effects of on Clustering • A color image representsthe change of readings A limited TTL Cluster-connection tree

  8. Correlation-based Sampler Selection (1/3) • Subclustering • Forced sampling • Collect sensor readings from all nodes in its cluster periodically. • denotes the column vector of consecutive forced samples. • Correlation Matrix and Distance Metric • Correlation matrix • Correlation distance matrix • Use agglomerative clustering to subcluster sensor nodes within into number of subclusters. ,

  9. Correlation-based Sampler Selection (2/3) • Sampler Selection • At least one node is selected as sampler • Nodes with more remaining energy are preferred • The number of samplers can be calculated by

  10. Correlation-based Sampler Selection (3/3) • Model and Schedule Reporting • Inform each node its new status • Send summary information to the base node • Data mean vector • Data covariance matrix • Effects of on Performance • Both large and small may decrease the prediction quality and increase the messaging cost

  11. Model-based Prediction • Prediction Model • The values of non-sampler nodes are predicted by probabilistic model • Forced samples do not propagate up to the based node Non-sampler Sampler : desired sampling period : forced sampling period

  12. Model-based Prediction • Calculating predicted sensor values • ,

  13. Evaluations

  14. A. Messaging Cost

  15. B. Energy Consumption

  16. C. Data Collection Quality(1/3) • 1000 sensor nodes in a square grid with side length of 1 unit • Transmission range 0.075 unit • TTL = 5

  17. C. Data Collection Quality(2/3) Fixed : system supplied Effective :

  18. C. Data Collection Quality(3/3) • Only messaging and sensing consume energy • Negative MAD implies the network exceeds its lifetime

More Related