1 / 11

Reasons for safe work practices in aviation line maintenance operations – and possible threats…

Reasons for safe work practices in aviation line maintenance operations – and possible threats…. Working on Safety Conference 2006, The Eemhof, The Netherlands By: Kenneth Pettersen & Karina Aase. Purpose and topics. Present preliminary results from my PhD research

lydie
Télécharger la présentation

Reasons for safe work practices in aviation line maintenance operations – and possible threats…

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Reasons for safe work practices in aviation line maintenance operations – and possible threats… Working on Safety Conference 2006, The Eemhof, The Netherlands By: Kenneth Pettersen & Karina Aase

  2. Purpose and topics • Present preliminary results from my PhD research • Data from aviation line maintenance operations • Part of research project directed towards understanding and analysing simultaneous changes to the Norwegian civil aviation system • Understand how safety is constructed as part of the reality of work • Use this perspective for understanding how change efforts effect safety

  3. Concepts • We view operational safety as a dynamic, interactive, communicative activity that is created as people conduct work, construct discourse and rationality around it, and gather experience from it (Dekker 2006). • We view operational safety as a result of interdependancies and interactions between different levels in a socio-technical system. Thus, operational safety is affected by changes at different levels (Rasmussen) • We view slack (i.e. time, knowledge, competence, tangible assets) as a possible precondition for safety instead of as unnecessary waste (Lawson 2001; Sagan 1993).

  4. Methods • A descriptive approach • Participant observation • Non-participant observation • Interviews • Conversations • Analysing data using categories induced from the data

  5. The line maintenance work context • Work was multifaceted with multiple goals and • Multiple hazards • Time constraints • Complex technology • An imperfect knowledge base and epistemic uncertainty • Trial and error strategies for solving problems

  6. Research focus • Formal descriptions of work are limited sources for knowledge about reality • Formal descriptions of work are developed under uncertainty • Text and 2D graphics cannot describe what is ”normal” • Technological complexity • Interaction between sub-systems • New fault categories • Technicians had developed a practice where they expanded their formal knowledge boundaries by using knowledge from experience and practical skills

  7. Elements of safe practice • An awareness of imperfection • Numerous interpretations of the world were acknowledged • Sensitive to ones practical boundaries of knowledge and competence • Epistemic uncertainty • Technological complexity • Assumptions about safety • Safety promoted as a superior goal • Creation of extended timeframes • The value of slowing things down to address all safety concerns (Roberts and Tadmore 2006)

  8. Elements of safe practice II • Promotion of practical knowledge and skill • Culture of experts and specialized skill • Deference to expertise • The organisation’s complete technical competence • Organising for diversity • Structure • Minimum hierarchy made flexible reorganisations possible • ”Garbage can” processes

  9. Effects of changes • New interface between maintenance org. and airline • Lost the feeling of aircraft ownership • Decrease in experience transfer between maintenance control, maintenance engineers and technicians • Less contact with the technology • The building of structural walls • Engine work-shop sold • Component work-shop closed down • Heavy Maintenance Department closed down • Reduced availability of competence, skill and resources

  10. Effects of changes • Change in learning processes • Fewer refresher courses • Formal updates on operations as e-learning • Information on new faults and problem solving strategies as e-learning • Cut-off from interaction with other operational personnel • Change in infrastructure • Altered patterns for learning of operative knowledge • Worst case:loss of operative knowledge and experience

  11. Implications for work on safety • Work on occupational safety must include approaches directed at the realities of work practice • Thereby discovering how safety is created in different communities of practice • Involves etnographic approaches • Value ”bottom-up” perspectives and analysis of work practice when making decisions about safety • Value slack in organisations as possible preconditions for safety instead of unnecessary waste

More Related