1 / 13

Who stands for reflective teacher education?

Who stands for reflective teacher education?. John Oversby. Overview. Who is a reflective teacher? Why does reflection matter? How do we signify a reflective teacher? Frontier science and textbook science Teaching standards and reflection DfE and reflection

lynn
Télécharger la présentation

Who stands for reflective teacher education?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Who stands for reflective teacher education? John Oversby

  2. Overview • Who is a reflective teacher? • Why does reflection matter? • How do we signify a reflective teacher? • Frontier science and textbook science • Teaching standards and reflection • DfE and reflection • Learned scientific societies and reflection • ASE and reflection • ATSE and reflection • A blueprint for action

  3. Who is a reflective teacher? • Reflection: explicit evaluation and action within a theoretical framework involving introspection. • Introspection: self-observation and reporting of conscious inner thoughts, desires and sensations. • Introspection illusion: ‘unaware of their unawareness’ (Wilson et al, 2008)

  4. Why does reflection matter? • Instrumental teaching is teaching under the control of another: syllabus constructor; assessment creator; line manager. It is extrinsically determined. • Reflective teaching is teaching from within, within a framework. It is intrinsically determined. It is theoretically framed. • Normal teaching is personal mix of instrumental and reflective teaching. The exact mix depends on values and knowledge. • Reflection provides a stimulus for innovation, and for a determination of effectiveness.

  5. Types of reflection

  6. How do we signify a reflective teacher? • Explicit rationale for pedagogical practices • Reflective diary or journal • Explicit provision of rationale to learners. • Transparency of discussion • Commitment to values of fairness, justice and compassion. • Osterman (1990) comments, "critically reflective teachers - teachers who make their own thinking public, and therefore subject to discussion - are more likely to have classes that are challenging, interesting, and stimulating for students" (p. 139) • Stones (1994) suggested that three important elements are necessary for reflection to occur: practical experience, a meaningful knowledge base, and interaction with other human beings. • Ginsburg (1988) added strong problem solving skills as another critical component of productive and meaningful reflection. • Zeichner and Liston (1996) wrote that reflection is essential for helping understand the complex nature of classrooms.

  7. Frontier science and textbook science • Textbook science: established science with great confidence. • Frontier science: provisional, tentative and liable to change or abandonment.

  8. Teaching standards and reflection There are no standards relating to either reflection, evidence-based teaching or critical thinking.

  9. DfE and reflection • A search on the DfE site shows that it is almost entirely focused on evaluations of projects, and of research in generic areas such as inclusion, and not at all on reflection.

  10. Learned scientific societies and reflection • There are no references on the sites of RSC, IoP or The Royal Society about reflective practitioners in science education.

  11. ATSE and reflection • ATSE contributions assert reflection on many documents but nowhere is the term made clear.

  12. A blueprint for action • Research Committee and ATSE collaborate in an article on Reflective Practitioners in Science Education. • ASE promotes Reflective Practice as a major thrust. • More research into the place of reflection in the teaching of science.

  13. References • Brookfield S (1995) The Getting of Wisdom: What Critically Reflective Teaching is and Why It's Important from Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Accessed on 4th August 2011 at http://nlu.nl.edu/academics/cas/ace/facultypapers/StephenBrookfield_Wisdom.cfm • Ginsburg, M. B.(1988). Contradictions in teacher education and society: A critical analysis. New York: Falmer. • Osterman, K. F. (1990). Reflective practice: A new agenda for education. Education and Urban Society, 22 (2); February 1990, p 133-152. • Osterman, K.F. & Kottamp, R.B. (2004). Reflective practice for educators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. • Stones E. (1994) Reform in teacher education: The power and the pedagogy. Journal of Teacher Education, 45, 310-318. • Wilson, Timothy D.; Yoav Bar-Anan (August 22, 2008). "The Unseen Mind". Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) 321 (5892): 1046–1047 • Zeichner, M. and Liston, P. (1996). Reflective teaching: An introduction. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.

More Related