1 / 8

Crab Cavity Applications in Future Particle Colliders: Schedule & Outlook

This summary highlights discussions on applications of crab cavities in future lepton-hadron colliders, focusing on improving beam-beam interactions and geometric overlap to enhance luminosity leveling and beam quality. It explores potential applications in HL-LHC, RR LHeC, RL LHeC, HE-LHC, eRHIC, and beyond, discussing off-momentum cleaning, bunch compression, and field quality considerations. The session emphasizes development and implementation planning, outlining project structures and budget estimates, with a focus on choosing the right cavity type for optimal performance. Key aspects include roadmap outlining, beam test specifics, system specifications, and operational considerations for running physics experiments.

macon
Télécharger la présentation

Crab Cavity Applications in Future Particle Colliders: Schedule & Outlook

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 4th LHC Crab Cavity Workshop Summary of session on « Schedule & Future Outlook…»

  2. Other Crab Cavity Applications F. Zimmermann • Crabbing of colliding beams at the IP - improving geometric overlap - boosting beam-beam tune shift - luminosity leveling - avoiding off-center collisions from beam loading → HL-LHC, RR LHeC, RL LHeC, HE-LHC, eRHIC,… • Off-momentum cleaning → HL-LHC • Bunch compression → PDPWA

  3. Crab cavities in future lepton-hadron colliders ~2 MV at ~1.5 GHz ~4 MV at ~0.8 GHz? ~20 MV at ~0.4 GHz ~200 MV at ~0.4 GHz?? V. Litvinenko, IPAC10

  4. Field quality Preliminary analysis R. Calaga, E. Jensen … but modulated by synchrotron motion Key question ! Could also guide the choice of cavity type

  5. Development and implementation planning (1/3) E. Jensen HL-LHC Project and the Proposed Design Study “HiLumi LHC” Collaboration Board Advisory Committee Project Office: Resource manager Technical coordinators Project Coordinator Steering Committee R&D on enabling technologies Design Studies Technical Design WP2 WPn French “Grand Emprunt” EuCARD WP1 Total HL-LHC: 500 M€ Total HiLumi LHC: 27 M€ US-LARP Jpk 27/4/2010

  6. Development and implementation planning (2/3) Choice of solution(s) for HL-LHC E. Jensen HL-LHC Project and the Proposed Design Study “HiLumi LHC” FP7 Design Study framework plus: new cryoplant IR4, RF power systems, LLRF, ...

  7. Development and implementation planning (3/3) E. Jensen For 8 cavities If Compact CC’s are selected: Cavities alone: 30 MCHF, 7.1 FTE∙66 months (40 FTEy) Total « ballpark » estimate: 80 MCHF + 15 man.years Large uncertainty! If elliptical crab cavities have to be built: Cavities alone (???): 12 MCHF, 10 FTE∙24 months (20 FTEy)

  8. Comments (personal) on planning • At the level of the HL-LHC Project, need to outline: • The different possibilities (e.g. Crab Cavities) with their own roadmaps • Specifications / beam performance • The milestones for decisions • Within the Crab Cavity work programme, need to clarify quickly: • The precise purposes of the beam tests in the SPS • The schedule and the procedure for deciding which cavity should be tested in the SPS • The final system specifications (deflecting field, direction of kick (H/V), dimensions, acceptable non-linearities, impedance, machine protection requirements…) • Possibility to run for physics with a not operational cavity

More Related