1 / 4

Overview

Beam Schedule Scenarios 2007. Overview. Scenario C1 – with Kottmann et al. Disadvantage: (i) Beam Line + BTS dismantled & re-built (ii) 3 3/4 Months Running Time Advantages:

madeline-kosta
Télécharger la présentation

Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Beam Schedule Scenarios 2007 MEG Review February 2007

  2. Overview • Scenario C1 – with Kottmann et al. • Disadvantage: • (i) Beam Line + BTS dismantled & re-built • (ii) 33/4 Months Running Time • Advantages: • (i) Full testing C-W & beam Line with Calorimeter (early) • (ii) Allows more time for DCs • Scenario D1 – Maximized MEG Run • Disadvantages: • (i) Does not allow initial testing of C-W with Calorimeter • (ii) Kottmann et al. cannot be included until end-of-year (not possible) • Advantages: • (i) Allows 41/2 Months Running Time MEG Review February 2007

  3. Scenario C1 Kottmann et al. • Shifting Kottmann et al. to a later date correspondingly shifts: • BTS • Beam Commissioning (if we don’t want to re-build beam line several times) • MEG Beam Run MEG Review February 2007

  4. Scenario D1 Max. MEG Run MEG Review February 2007

More Related