280 likes | 401 Vues
This presentation explores how SAP embraced Code Review as an essential tool in their Agile toolbox. We share our journey of becoming Agile, lessons learned from Open Source, and how Code Review complements practices like Pair Programming and Test Driven Development. With over 4,000 trained developers, we highlight best practices in Code Review and its integration with Scrum methodologies. Our experience illustrates that Code Review not only improves code quality but also enhances collaboration within and between teams, facilitating better Agile processes.
E N D
Code Reviewas a Great Tool in the Agile Toolbox Matthias Sohn, Stefan Lay (SAP) Matthias.sohnn@sap.com, stefan.lay@sap.com Twitter: @masohn @stefanlay
Agenda How we became agile What we learned from Open Source Why we embraced Code Review How we scale up agile with Open Source processes
Agile Feedback cycles Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_Programming
Agile Feedback cycles Pair Programming Ralph and Karsten hackingon E4
Agile Feedback cycles Test Driven Development
Agile Feedback cycles Continuous Integration Q: Who iswho?
Agile Feedback cycles • Code Review? • Sometimes formal Code Review (Fagan style inspection) • Pair Programming is considered to be more agile • Higher bandwidth (Faster feedback) • Leads to faster integration than Code Review • “Individuals and interactions over processes and tools”
Agile Software Engineering • Engineering practices are key • SAP trained its developers • > 4000 participants • 1 week training • 3 weeks coaching • Focus on • Scrum • Pair programming • Test Driven Development • Continuous Integration • Acceptance Tests
Code Review in Open Source MaintainerHierarchy / Contributors Public peerreview on mailinglist • Committer / Contributormodel • Public peerreview • Patch in Bugzilla • Gerrit • Github
Code Review vs. Pair Programming • Code Review • leads to small, self-contained increments • ensures that ideas can be understood from code • leads to review discussions visible to everybody • leaves room to develop alternative solutions • Ideal complement to Pair Programmingwhich is great to • explore unknown terrain • onboard new developer • combine complementary skills
Code Review is asynchronous • Can be done when there is time • The whole team can review (also external reviewers) • Review takes time, but also leaves time • This leads to parallel workflow • Git perfectly supports this • Some aspects can be automated • Rule checking • Build and test • Deployment to staging environment • All checks happen before submit
Code Review Best Practices • Small changes are much easier to review • A change should logically do one thing (not many) • No change shall break build or tests • Split big changes into series of digestible changes • - These changes depend on each other • - Last change should switch the new feature on • Commit message should explain Why • - The What should be obvious from the code change
Code Review and Scrum • Successful code review required for a task to be finished • Many Done Criteria already checked during code review • Make review visible on Scrum Board • Reserve time for review • Everybody should review
Code Review and Scrum Scrum Board
Code Review with Git and Gerrit • Gerrit is a Code Review system based on JGit • http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/ • Also serves as a Git server • Adding access control and workflow • Used by • Androidhttps://android-review.googlesource.com/ • Eclipsehttps://git.eclipse.org/r/ • Google, QualComm, SAP, WikiMedia…
Code Review with Git and Gerrit Gerrit usage at SAP started 2010 Projects: > 2.000 Users: > 4.000 Changes: > 300.000 Run by a small team of developers (us) Training is important (> 400 developers) Recently Git and Gerrit were approved as standard infrastructure
Scaling Agile with Open Source Processes Agile processesworkgreatforsmallteams • Collaborationbetweenteamsof a large project? • High levelplanningofcrossteamtopics still necessary • Open Source likeprocessescanreplacedetailed top-down planning • Contributetocomponentsownedbyotherteams • Review relevant changesofotherteams • Scale up Pair Programming -> “Hackathons”
Contributions between teams • Find projectinformationeasily • Standardizedinfrastructure • Contributor Guide
Standardized infrastructure gitclone <URL> mvn clean install EclipseCBI: http://wiki.eclipse.org/CBI
Contributor Guide Standardized Wheretogetthesources Howtosetuptheproject Howtobuild Review process Communication channels CorrectionProcess Codingconventions Howtotest Review rules … Project specific
Conclusion Code Review brings additional valueto agile teams Gitand Gerrit help a lot Improvescollaboration within and betweenteams Standardizationhelpstoscale
Agile Manifesto Individuals and interactions over processes and tools Working software over comprehensive documentation Customer collaboration over contract negotiation Responding to change over following a plan In a complexandchangingenvironmentfeedbackiskey!