1 / 38

Spanish Psychiatrists' Views on Mental Disorders Classification: WPA-WHO Global Survey Results

This study presents results from the Global Survey of Psychiatrists' Attitudes Towards Mental Disorders Classification conducted by the Spanish Society of Psychiatry. Data collected from 128 participants between Nov 3, 2010, and Dec 31, 2010, explored their use and perceptions of classification systems, desired categories, usability across cultures, reactions to adverse events, and the need for national classifications. Findings offer insights into the preferences and challenges faced by psychiatrists in Spain.

maegan
Télécharger la présentation

Spanish Psychiatrists' Views on Mental Disorders Classification: WPA-WHO Global Survey Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WPA-WHO Global Survey of Psychiatrists' Attitudes Towards Mental Disorders Classification Results for the Spanish Society of Psychiatry

  2. Spanish Society of Psychiatry 128 participants Data collected: 3 Nov 2010 - 31 Dec 2010 Number of members solicited: 492 26.0% response rate Age (years): - Mean = 53.9 - SD = 12.3 - Range = 27 - 82 Professional experience (years): - Mean = 23.3 - SD = 13.0 - Range = 0 - 55 Response time (minutes): Gender: - Median = 12.0 - Range = 5 - 110 - 72.7% Male - 27.3% Female Currently see patients: 96.1%

  3. Patient Contact Hours

  4. Patient Contact Hours p < 0.05

  5. Use of Classification System

  6. Classification System Most Used

  7. Classification System Most Used p < 0.05

  8. Purpose of Classification

  9. Purpose of Classification p < 0.05

  10. Number of Categories Desired

  11. Primary Care Classification

  12. Primary Care Classification p < 0.05

  13. Use by Other Mental Health Professionals

  14. Understandable for Non-Professionals

  15. Strict Criteria vs Flexible Guidance

  16. Severity

  17. Severity p < 0.05

  18. Functional Status

  19. Functional Status p < 0.05

  20. A Dimensional Component

  21. A Dimensional Component p < 0.05

  22. Reactions to Adverse Life Events

  23. Reactions to Adverse Life Events p < 0.05

  24. UsabilityAcrossCultures

  25. U.S. andEurocentric

  26. Categories’ Frequency of Use

  27. Categories’ Frequency of Use

  28. Categories’ Ease Use

  29. Categories’ Ease Use

  30. Categories’ Goodness of Fit

  31. Categories’ Goodness of Fit

  32. ProblematicCategories

  33. Remove or Move Categories

  34. AddCategories

  35. StigmatizingTerms

  36. Need for NationalClassification

  37. Need for NationalClassification p < 0.05

  38. Thank you for your participation and collaboration!

More Related