1 / 24

Cataloging Microfossils of Yakutat Bay, Alaska

Cataloging Microfossils of Yakutat Bay, Alaska. Alexander D. Ullrich Dept. of Geology Appalachian St. University Boone, NC. Field Setting:. Yakutat Bay, Alaska Hubbard Glacier- Tidewater glacier emptying into Disenchantment Bay, AK. High turbidity: high sed. discharge Low salinity

maeko
Télécharger la présentation

Cataloging Microfossils of Yakutat Bay, Alaska

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Cataloging Microfossils of Yakutat Bay, Alaska Alexander D. Ullrich Dept. of Geology Appalachian St. University Boone, NC

  2. Field Setting: • Yakutat Bay, Alaska • Hubbard Glacier- • Tidewater glacier emptying into Disenchantment Bay, AK. • High turbidity: high sed. discharge • Low salinity • Summer discharge causes thick mud layers • Iceberg calving causes winter diamicton layers Study Area http://northlandsvs.com/

  3. Catalog of foraminifera • Distal Multicore chosen • High-density, high diversity • Picked 300 individual population Multicore 8 Multicorer on R/V Alpha Helix tailfan

  4. Microfossils: • Tiny remains of bacteria, fungi, animals, plants, and protists • Extremely useful as environmental indicators • Foraminifera in particular: • Species indicate salinity, high/low energy, bathymetry, DO content, temperature • Seasonal variation http://woodshole.er.usgs.gov/epubs/bolide/ancient_cataclysm.html http://ijolite.geology.uiuc.edu/02SprgClass/geo117/Ocean%20images/Microfoss.html

  5. Foraminifera: • Single-celled protists with shells (tests), called “forams” or “bugs” (Phylum: Protozoa) • Consume algae, diatoms, other protists by extending protoplasm through aperture in test (psuedopodia) • Protoplasm is inside test chamber (chambers added as foram grows) • Often used in age-dating and correlation of rock • Extant species used to interpret environments and climates http://www.soton.ac.uk/~bam2/col-index/fossi-lindex/Forams/Eelco/med-agean2/pages/pl-02.htm Pseudopodia Protoplasm

  6. Results: Genera and Species Classification Distinguishing features of a genus: • Planktic vs. Benthic

  7. Results: Genera and Species Classification Distinguishing features of a genus: • Planktic vs. Benthic • Agglutinated test vs. secreted test agglutinated secreted

  8. Results: Genera and Species Classification Distinguishing features of a genus: Limbate • Planktic vs. Benthic • Agglutinated test vs. secreted test • Limbate/Costate structures Costate

  9. Results: Genera and Species Classification Distinguishing features of a species: • Morphology of Aperture (Echols and Armentrout, 1980)

  10. Results: Genera and Species Classification Distinguishing features of a species: • Morphology of Aperture • Coiling of test: • Planispiral • Involute • Trochospiral http://www.andreaperl.de/14_69_ammoniahtml.html

  11. Results: Genera and Species Classification Distinguishing features of a species: • Morphology of Aperture • Coiling of test: • Evolute • Involute • Trochospiral • Streptospiral • Other morphological features (costate protrusion, limbate thickness, papillate presence, etc.)

  12. Plate 1: Abundant Genera • 1,2,3. Elphidium sp.A, 1000x • 4,8. Buccella sp. A, 1000x • 5,6. Epistominella sp. A, dextral, 1000x • Epistominella sp. A, sinistral, 1000x • 9,10. Cassidulina minuta, 1000x • 11, 12. Neogloboquadrina pachyderma, 1200x, 1100x • 13, 14. Nonionella stella, 400x • 15, 16. Nonionella labridorica, 400x

  13. Plate 2: Limited Genera • 1,2. Cribrostomoides sp. A, 1000x • Spiroplectammina sp. A, 1300x • Lagena sp. A, 500x • Triloculina sp. A, 700x • Triloculina sp. B, 400x • Bulimina sp. A, 400x • Bulimina sp. A, 200x • Fissurina sp. A, 1000x • Fissurina sp. A, 700x • Uvigerina sp. A, 250x • 12. Fissurina sp. B, 1000x

  14. Plate 3: Forams under a light microscope • 1,2. Nonionella labridorica, 40x • 3,4. Nonionella stella, 40x • 5,6. Buccella sp. A, 51x • Epistominella sp. A, 51x • Bulimina sp. A, 51x • Cribrostomoides sp. A, 32x • Cassidulina limbata, 40x • Cassidulina norcrossi, 40x • Cassidulina sp. A, 40x • Cassidulina minuta, 64x • 14. Fissurina sp. A, 51x

  15. Conclusions: Goals included: • Gaining experience in SEM techniques and theory

  16. Conclusions: Goals included: • Gaining experience in SEM techniques and theory • Foram picking techniques

  17. Conclusions: Goals included: • Gaining experience in SEM techniques and theory • Foram picking techniques • Start gathering images of representative genera for catalog

  18. Conclusions: Goals included: • Gaining experience in SEM techniques and theory • Foram picking techniques • Start gathering images of representative genera for catalogue • All goals were accomplished during semester

  19. Conclusions: Goals included: Questions: • Gaining experience in SEM techniques and theory • Foram picking techniques • Start gathering images of representative genera for catalogue • All goals were accomplished during semester • Genera/species change from distal to proximal?

  20. Conclusions: Goals included: Questions: • Gaining experience in SEM techniques and theory • Foram picking techniques • Start gathering images of representative genera for catalogue • All goals were accomplished during semester • Genera/species change from distal to proximal? • Environmental changes shown by distribution within sediment?

  21. Conclusions: Goals included: Questions: • Gaining experience in SEM techniques and theory • Foram picking techniques • Start gathering images of representative genera for catalogue • All goals were accomplished during semester • Genera/species change from distal to proximal? • Environmental changes shown by distribution within sediment? • Seasonal variation?

  22. Future Research: Senior Thesis • Targeting specific foraminifera species as environmental indicators • Specifically: • Elphidium excavatum forma clavatum • Elphidium frigidum

  23. References: • Lipps, J.H., 1981, What,if anything, is micropaleontology?: Paleobiology, v. 7, no. 2, pp. 167-191. • Echols, R.J., and Armentrout, J.M., 1980, Holocene foraminiferal distribution patterns on the shelf and slope, Yakataga- Yakutat area northern Gulf of Alaska: Proceedings of the Quaternary depositional environments of the Pacific Coast Pacific Coast Paleogeography Symposium, no. 4, pp. 281- 303. • Bergen, F.W., and O’Neil, P., 1979, Distribution of Holocene foraminifera in the Gulf of Alaska: Journal of Paleontology, v. 53, no. 6, p. 1267-1292. • Quinterno, P., Carlson, P., and Bruce F. Molnia, 1980, Benthic foraminifers from the eastern Gulf of Alaska: Quaternary depositional Environments of the Pacific Coast: Pacific Coast Paleogeographic Symposium 4,

  24. Special Thanks to: • Dr. Ruth Dewel, Dept. of Biology, ASU • Dr. Ellen Cowan, Dept. of Geology, ASU • Dr. Steven Hageman, Dept. of Geology, ASU • Dr. Sarah Zellers, Dept. of Geology, MSU • FEI Systems Technicians • The 2005 SEM Lab class

More Related