1 / 7

Unità operativa di Anatomia Patologica, Azienda Ospedaliera “V. Cervello”, Palermo,Italy

EVALUATION OF AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD FOR DNA EXTRACTION FROM PARAFFIN-EMBEDDED TISSUES FOR PCR AMPLIFICATION. G. Costanzo,T. Mannone, E. Gallo, F. Guddo, F. Raiata, V. Randazzo and A.G. Rizzo. Unità operativa di Anatomia Patologica, Azienda Ospedaliera “V. Cervello”, Palermo,Italy.

mahdis
Télécharger la présentation

Unità operativa di Anatomia Patologica, Azienda Ospedaliera “V. Cervello”, Palermo,Italy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EVALUATION OF AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD FOR DNA EXTRACTION FROM PARAFFIN-EMBEDDED TISSUES FOR PCR AMPLIFICATION. G. Costanzo,T. Mannone, E. Gallo, F. Guddo, F. Raiata, V. Randazzo and A.G. Rizzo. Unità operativa di Anatomia Patologica, Azienda Ospedaliera “V. Cervello”, Palermo,Italy

  2. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues are one of the popular sources of diagnostic materials, the easiest to store and trasport.

  3. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a method for the in vitro amplification of specific nucleic acid sequences. The major attraction of the PCR, for research and diagnostic purposes in pathology, is its ability to work on low doses of DNA samples obtained by simple methods of extraction.

  4. There are more studies comparing different techniques of DNA extraction from paraffin-embedded tissues. In the present study, we compared two methods: 1) Overnight proteinase K digestion followed by 5% Chelex-100 (BioRad) purification

  5. 2) a commercial kit (BioDiagene DNA extraction kit).

  6. Both methods were applied to extract DNA from thirty blocks of various organs: • lung • breast • thyroid • spleen • colon • testicle • appendix • uterus Chelex-100 method BioDiagene method Successful extraction was determined by the ability to amplify a 268-bp fragment of the house-keeping gene beta-globin.

  7. CONCLUSION • Although we were able to obtain amplificable • DNA as Chelex-100 method as BioDiagene • method • We found two important advantages: • BioDiagene is faster than Chelex-100 method, infact, in only 30 minutes the DNA is extracted and ready to use for PCR amplification. • BioDiagene requires less material, infact it is sufficient only one 10mm thickness section against 2-10 sections for Chelex-100.

More Related