Comparing Consumption : inter-national and inter-temporal

1. Comparing Consumption:inter-national and inter-temporal An-Chi Tung, 2007.1.19

2. Outline • Graphs across economies • patterns: right peak, left peak, twin peak, central peak… • public vs private • health and education • Findings and questions • trend? changes? why? what impact? • …

3. Graphs of Consumption

4. List of Countries

7. Patterns of Mean Consumption: preliminary guess • Peak at right end • US 2003, Sweden 2003 • Twin Peaks • Japan 1999, Costa Rica 2004, France 2001, Korea, 2000 • Peak at left • with immediate drop:Taiwan 1986, 1991, 1998, 2003 • with smooth drop:Thailand 1996, 2004; Indonesia 1996, 1999 • Other: Increasing, flat, decreasing… • Chile 1997, Uruguay 1994, India 1999, Philippines 1999?

8. - very high ratio for Sweden! (The US is high, too.) - due to health expenditures? mostly public?

9. Japan: 17…38…57 Costa Rica: 27…43…57 France: 15…43…54 Korea: 18…42…53 (Taiwan: 21..[29]..58) - due to both education and health?

10. Peak age: 19-21 - due to education? - time pattern: save less over time?

11. Thailand 2004: 21 Thailand 1996: 20 Indonesia 1996, 1999 : 23 • mild peak, due to education? • if so, the peak age is a little late in Indonesia (check why) • - time pattern

12. Chile: 50

13. Very late! Late! Education?

14. Why Different? Differences among age groups may have to do with (i) time: increasing over time? (ii) composition of consumption: education, health, others… (iii) private or public and financial sources: YL, asset reallocation, transfer…

15. Time Trend of Level and Shape

17. Taiwan, 1981-2003

18. From Gretchen Donehower : Labor Income and Consumption, 1888-2003 Dollars (US, 2000) Age

19. Composition of Consumption • Importance of Health and Education • Size of the Public Sector

20. Public vs. Private • Public • education: allocated by no. of students at each level • health: NHI, by individual; non-NHI, per capita • the rest: per capita • Private • education: regression on students • health: regression • housing and durables: equivalence scale • the rest: equivalence scale

21. Decomposing Consumption (normalized by mean YL age 30-49) Sweden 2003 US 2003 Japan 2003 Taiwan 2003 Indonesia 1999 Costa Rica 2003 Thailand 2004 Taiwan 1981

22. % of Health and Education in C(normalized by mean YL age 30-49) Sweden 2003 Japan 2004 France 2001 Uruguay 1994 Taiwan 2003 Japan 2004 Philippines 1999 Indonesia 1999

23. % of Public C in C (normalized by mean YL age 30-49) Sweden 2003 Japan 2004 France 2001 Uruguay 1994 Taiwan 2003 Japan 2004 Philippines 1999 Indonesia 1999

24. Change in Composition over Time in Taiwan (normalized to avg C of age 20-64) • Taiwan, 1981 • Taiwan, 2003 • Larger share of public C, and larger shares of CGE and CGH for age 01-19 than in 1981 • Allocating more to the youth group than to the elderly Age 0-19 20-64 65+

25. Taiwan, 1981 Chile,1997 Taiwan, 2003 Sweden, 2003 Age 0-19 20-64 65+ Age 0-19 20-64 65+ Taiwan, 2003

26. Issues and Questions

27. General Observations • There are differences across economies in level, shape, composition. For example, some countries have much larger public sector than the others, and some spend more on education. • For total C, there are four basic types. • Longitudinally, there may be a time trend.

28. Some questions • About trend or changes over time: - Is avg C (relative to YL) rising over time? Has this to do with GDP level or co-residence pattern? - Why does avg C drop after an early age: e.g. age 19 in Taiwan, 1998? 2. Does the increase in public consumption on health spending reduce the public consumption on education (as in the case of Taiwan)? If yes, future growth may be affected. • Does the increase in public consumption on health cause a decrease in private consumption on health? • …

29. Methodological Issues… • Same definition of education and health across countries? (e.g., does “education” includes boarding expenditure and private tutoring? 2. Which methodology is best?