170 likes | 333 Vues
This paper explores the evolving landscape of Postgraduate Research (PGR) electronic theses in the UK. It addresses current trends in doctoral awards, including diversity, concentration, and quality assurance practices. We analyze the growing significance of accessibility in electronic formats and the implications of managing and examining these works. Key data highlights include the distribution of doctorates across institutions, attendance modes, and emerging professional doctorate programs. As these trends continue to evolve, this research offers essential insights into enhancing scholarly communication and compliance in PGR.
E N D
Electronic Theses Howard Green Staffordshire University Chair. UK Council for Graduate Education
Current Trends in PGR Electronic theses – some thoughts Examining Culture changes Accessibility Format
Current trends in PGR Numbers Diversity Concentration Quality assurance and compliance
Table 1: Total number of Doctorates awarded by UK HEIs, 1996-2002 Source: HESA Table 13
Table 2: The Distribution of Doctorates awarded by Institution (2000)
Managing Tracking Supervising Examining Some Implications
Full time/part time Disciplinary Types of doctoral awards and associated outputs. Mathematics to Music Published works to Professional Doctorates Issues - Diversity
Table 4: Professional Doctorate Programmes in UK Universities 1998 to 2000
Doctor of Education Doctor of Engineering Doctor of Clinical Psychology Doctor of Psychology Doctor of Educational Psychology Doctor of Counselling Psychology Doctor of Occupational Psychology Doctor of Clinical Science-Psychotherapy Doctor of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy Doctor of Business Administration Doctor of Administration Doctor of Finance Table 5: Professional Doctorates in the different disciplines - 1998
HEFCE/ Joint Funding Councils – Improving Standards QAA Review of PGR Code of Practice Quality Assurance
Very variable Stage 1 Hard/soft/ring – bound Some use of E for appendices etc. Stage 2 Final Bound Examining – Current Practice
Negatives Need to print? Cost transfer IT skills of external Screen reading Definitive versions Stability and modification Examination Issues
Positives Word/text searches Plagiarism checks Check validity Examining
Very slow change process for all PhD work Gold standard(s) Amending Regulations – not a problem?? As no BS – good time to attend to this too? Culture Change
Would help (increased difficulty in getting copy) Accessible to who? Plagiarism? Accessibility