1 / 16

Larry Rosenthal , UC Berkeley

Where Will the Poor Live? Housing Policy and the Location of Low-Income Households. Census 2000: Lessons Learned. Larry Rosenthal , UC Berkeley. National Poverty Trends. US Poverty fell from 13.5% in 1990, to 11.8% in 1999, then to 10.1% in 2001 A rising tide … from a dot-com boom!

maja
Télécharger la présentation

Larry Rosenthal , UC Berkeley

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Where Will the Poor Live? Housing Policy and the Location of Low-Income Households Census 2000:Lessons Learned Larry Rosenthal, UC Berkeley

  2. National Poverty Trends • US Poverty fell from 13.5% in 1990, to 11.8% in 1999, then to 10.1% in 2001 • A rising tide … from a dot-com boom! • Historical trend: for those 18 to 65, poverty rate has stayed roughly flat, fluctuating mostly between 11% and 13%, since the early 1980s

  3. Still a Family Matter …

  4. … and an urban one.

  5. Median Poverty Rates - Suburbs

  6. Median Poverty Rates - Cities

  7. Approach • To explore residential poverty, we extract a database of 115 urban metro areas • All population centers > 500,000 • All smaller metro areas > 250,000 having greater than 10% poverty rate • Loci of urban poverty: What are these places like?

  8. Urban Poverty Remains Stagnant • Simple model: 2000 downtown poverty rates as a function of: • 1990 downtown poverty rates • Background economic factors (job growth) • These two factors (both highly significant) together account for > 90% of the variation • Suburban poverty similar, but wider variation

  9. The Urban South Lags Behind • Border towns in Texas suffer exorbitant poverty rates in the urban core: • McAllen: 35.9% • Brownsville: 33.1% • Elsewhere: • New Orleans: 28% • El Paso: 24% • Despite substantial job growth in some regions, downtown concentrations of the poor persist.

  10. Falling Poverty = Desegregation? • Poverty fell substantially during the 90’s • Effects were distributed widely by region; benefits concentrated in suburbs • What can Census 2000 tell us about spatial concentration of the poor in metro areas? • “Dissimilarity” Index calculated for 115 metro areas.

  11. Going in the Right Direction • During the Nineties, average poverty segregation rates fell by 1.9 points on avg. in US central cities • Segregation fell by 1.7 points on avg. across US metro areas • Nevertheless, one-quarter of metro areas faced increasing downtown segregation of the poor (e.g., Sacramento; Salem, OR)

  12. Some Progress on Urban African-American Segregation • Almost no large metro area in the US exacerbated segregation of black households in the Nineties, and most marginally reduced it • Substantial improvement (more than 10 points off the dissimilarity index) noted across the map • These statistics are perhaps a remnant of how bad segregation became in places like Detroit and Philadelphia (D>.60 in some areas)

  13. The US Suburban Racial Divide • African-Americans -- Poverty segreg. fell: • 11% rural • 14% urban core • Only 5% in suburbs • Hispanic -- Similarly lopsided gains: • 11% rural • 8% urban core • 4% in suburbs • (source: Prof. Paul Jargowsky, UT-Dallas)

  14. Does “smart growth” end up isolating the poor? • Curious pattern in the data: • Higher central-city and metro segregation of the poor signif. associated with faster gains in urban population density • Such areas also added jobs faster and relieved black racial segregation better, on average • Picture emerges of “containment” of aging housing stock in older suburbs, isolated from economic development

  15. Suburban Poverty: A New Urban Policy Frontier? • In Census 2000, rising metro poverty outside the central cities is significantly associated with: • Slower metro job growth in and around the largest cities • Greater black and hispanic racial segregation across the metro area • Greater spatial dispersion of the poor • Decreased population densities

  16. Metro Population and Economic Expansion Track One Another

More Related