1 / 31

Data Quality Standards at the U.S. Census Bureau

Data Quality Standards at the U.S. Census Bureau. Pamela D. McGovern and John M. Bushery U.S. Census Bureau Quality Program Staff Washington, DC 20233 European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics July 2008. Agenda. Background Development Process Framework and Structure

makoto
Télécharger la présentation

Data Quality Standards at the U.S. Census Bureau

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Data Quality Standardsat the U.S. Census Bureau Pamela D. McGovern and John M. Bushery U.S. Census Bureau Quality Program Staff Washington, DC 20233 European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics July 2008

  2. Agenda • Background • Development Process • Framework and Structure • What Worked Well • Next Steps • Challenges

  3. Background

  4. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) • Provides direction on Government-wide budget and management issues • Issued Information Quality Guidelines (2002) • Issued Standards and Guidelines for Statistical Surveys (2006)

  5. U.S. Census Bureau Composed of separate program directorates: • Economic • Demographic • Decennial

  6. Quality Program • Initiated in 1998 • Purpose • Advance and maintain the Census Bureau interests in quality of its products and processes • Key players • Methodology and Standards (M&S) Council • Quality Program Staff Reference: Landman, et al., (Q2001)

  7. Methodology and Standards (M&S) Council • Steering Committee for the Quality Program • Chiefs of methodology & research divisions and senior statisticians and methodologists • Ensure sound statistical and methodological practices

  8. Quality Program Staff (QPS) • Support staff for the M&S Council • Facilitate development and implementation of standards and guidelines • Evaluate implementation of standards

  9. Development Process

  10. Original Approach • Informal process • Team formed based on need • No formal deadlines • Detailed requirements • Development periods lengthy • Took from 1 to 4 years

  11. New Approach Structured approach that uses: • Dedicated Staff • Contractor Assistance • Directorate Reviewers • Focus Groups

  12. Dedicated Staff (QPS) Two Mathematical Statisticians and one Survey Statistician Advantages: • Development times decrease • Cohesion of content improve • Consistency of format improve

  13. Contractor Assistance Advantages: • Provides expertise in conducting focus groups • Brings outside perspective Disadvantage: • Lacks familiarity with Census Bureau issues

  14. Directorate Reviewers Focus group participants and program area managers Advantages: • Allows QPS to obtain directorate input early in process • Promotes buy-in Disadvantage: • Risk exists that can lose buy-in

  15. Focus Groups Seven to ten mid-level managers; Two hours in length Advantages: • Forum for discussing important issues across directorates • May increase buy-in • Participants more attentive during the review Disadvantage: • Scheduling difficulties can slow down process

  16. Process Steps • QPS sends draft standard to reviewers • QPS compiles comments and produces discussion issues for focus group • Contractor conducts focus group • QPS revises standard and conducts walk-throughs with the M&S Council • QPS prepares “final draft” standard and sends to reviewers along with responses • QPS and quality assurance staff review the requirements to determine if they are auditable • QPS submits set for final review and approval

  17. Framework and Structureof the Standards

  18. Framework • Lists standards and their purpose • Based on the OMB standards • Based on our existing Census Bureau standards (See our Information Quality website http://www.census.gov/quality/) • Consists of two types of standards • Process Standards (18) • Supporting Standards (5)

  19. Process Standards Reflect the phases of the life cycle of a data product: • Planning and Design • Obtaining Data • Processing Data • Analyzing Data • Disseminating Products

  20. Supporting Standards Apply to all phases of the life cycle: • Protecting Confidentiality • Managing Data and Documents • Ensuring Quality • Applying for a Waiver

  21. Structure of the Standards High-level requirements in list form: • State “what” is required; avoid the “how” • Include examples to provide guidance • Provide links to reference documents and to related standards

  22. What Worked Well

  23. Accelerated Development Reduced development times due to: • Early input • Straightforward requirements • Individual walkthroughs with the M&S Council members

  24. Program Area Input • Interviews with program area experts to get assistance in drafting requirements • Focus group approach • Structure the discussion based on comments • Overlap participants on related standards • Record the session

  25. Focus Group Evaluation Scale: 1= strongly disagree to 5= strongly agree

  26. Next Steps

  27. Next Steps • Review the full set of standards for completeness, consistency, and cohesion • Submit the standards to the directorates for final review and approval • Expect completion by September 2009

  28. Next Steps • Implementation of the standards • QPS assists the program directorates • Training • Evaluations of the implementation • Identify aspects of the standards that need improvement

  29. Challenges

  30. Challenges • Risk of excessive burden • How compliance will affect costs and schedules • High-level standards • Avoid being too vague • Program areas interpret standards differently • Verification of compliance • Audit program (Bushery et al., Q2006)

  31. Thank you Contact Information: Pamela D. McGovern 4600 Silver Hill Road U.S. Census Bureau Washington, DC 20233 pamela.d.mcgovern@census.gov

More Related