1 / 15

MAPC study area

MAPC study area. 2030: Alternate Futures. WOC envisions the results of more comprehensive regional planning Result of community workshops—what do participants want their town to look like in 2030? Looked at housing, demographic trends, employment, land use, etc. “Let It Be”.

malana
Télécharger la présentation

MAPC study area

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MAPC study area

  2. 2030: Alternate Futures • WOC envisions the results of more comprehensive regional planning • Result of community workshops—what do participants want their town to look like in 2030? • Looked at housing, demographic trends, employment, land use, etc. “Let It Be” “Winds Of Change”

  3. 2030: Alternate Futures • LIB predicts much greater loss of open space • LIB: 152,000 acres lost • WOC: 48,000 acres lost • Water shortage • LIB: 50 systems exceed permit limits • WOC: Only 8 exceed limits

  4. Housing Types

  5. Housing Types -8 housing types -3 land use categories: BNW, Residential, Commercial/Industrial, -For “Buildable Non-Wetland” landuse, two different model projections

  6. Grid data: VMT

  7. Grid data: VMT • Can do interesting things with grid data- map algebra, focal sum grids, etc. • How to combine with TAZ-level data on housing?

  8. Task at hand: Housing Allocation • Why look at housing below the level of the TAZ? -Accessibility affects where housing will (or should) go -Smaller scale  more engaging? -May be able to predict environmental impact—how VMT responds to development -A “check” on the MetroFuture model -Lofty goal: an algorithm to dump any data into

  9. Case study: Brookline • Intermediate between urban and rural—some open space, but mostly residential and industrial

  10. Case study: Brookline • Intermediate between urban and rural—some open space, but mostly residential and industrial

  11. Case study: Brookline • Intermediate between urban and rural—some open space, but mostly residential and industrial

  12. Case study: Wrentham • Rural—lots of BNW land

  13. Case study: Wrentham • Rural area • TAZs are very large compared to intermediate/urban towns • Effect of breaking down housing to smaller scale even more apparent

  14. Allocation: What is it for? • Assumptions are built into the allocation algorithm • This has implications for how you talk about allocation at the local level • Is the allocation a goal? • Is it a prediction?

  15. Allocation Strategies • Shan: Housing demand and accessibility • Paul: Two algorithms: Low VMT and Random • Masa: Case study: Wrentham • Abner: Case study: Brookline • Wanli and Yi: Neighborhood Emphasis

More Related