1 / 11

The Case for Pension Relief

The Case for Pension Relief. Presented by: Joseph A. LoCicero Harold S. Cooper July 16, 2014. Background. Main Multiemployer PPA Provisions of Pension Protection Act of 2006 Provided for zone status More rapid funding (15 years) Scheduled sunset – end of 2014 plan year

maleah
Télécharger la présentation

The Case for Pension Relief

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Case for Pension Relief Presented by: Joseph A. LoCiceroHarold S. Cooper July 16, 2014

  2. Background • Main Multiemployer PPA Provisions of Pension Protection Act of 2006 • Provided for zone status • More rapid funding (15 years) • Scheduled sunset – end of 2014 plan year • Effect of Sunset • Plans in Yellow and Red Zones continue with funding improvement and rehabilitation plans • Plans in Green Zone – lose options if funding deteriorates • Funding rules continue

  3. Background • Solutions not Bailouts • Assumed no government bailout • Considered financial challenges of PBGC multiemployer fund • Designed to preserve the multiemployer system with regular and reliable lifetime retirement income • Reduce the financial risks to employers in order to keep them in the plans and in order to attract new employers • Employer Concerns • Ability to borrow • FASB exposure • Withdrawal liability • Last man standing

  4. NCCMP Benefit Suspension Proposal • Plan has taken all reasonable measures to improve funding • Plan is expected to become insolvent within: • 20 years if ratio of inactive participants to active participants exceeds 2 to 1 • 15 years otherwise • Insolvency can be avoided if benefits are reduced but not below 110% of PBGC guarantee • Central States example — Can pay out $72 billion in benefits over next 50 years with suspension, compared to $28 billion before insolvency without 4

  5. PBGC Guaranteed Benefits • Based on participant’s benefit and years of service • Determine participant’s average benefit per year of service • Guarantee per year of service is: • 100% of first $11 of benefit • 75% of next $33 of benefit • Benefits in excess of $44 are not covered • Maximum benefit is $35.75 per year of service • Sample maximum guaranteed benefits: • 20 years: $715/month • 30 years: $1,072/month • 40 years: $1,430/month

  6. Case Study • Midwest area construction plan • Expected to become insolvent in 2028 • Insolvency date has been delayed due to favorable investment performance • Contribution level of $10 per hour • Limited increases in contribution rate (was $9 in 2006) • Benefit accrual rate of $50 per year of service, reduced from $100 several years ago • Many other cutbacks made as part of Rehabilitation Plan 6

  7. Retiree and Cash Flow Statistics • Average benefit (not including beneficiaries) of $1,700 per month • For service pensions, average benefit is $2,900 • 25% of pensioners have benefits in excess of $2,500 • PBGC guaranteed benefit maximum is $1,430 or less • Total benefits paid are $40 million • Total contributions are $20 million • Net outflows of $20 million per year • Market value of assets is $164 million • Expected asset decline of $8 million per year and accelerating

  8. Projected Plan Assets with no Changes

  9. Potential Benefit Suspension • Trustees asked: What is minimum reduction required across the board (actives, inactive vesteds and retirees) that would keep the plan from insolvency? • Approximately 10% • A few beneficiaries were affected by the 100% of PBGC guarantee requirement, so the average reduction was 9.8% • Other issues not considered, such as limited reductions to older or low benefit participants • PBGC Guarantee would result in average benefit cut of nearly 50%, once the plan is insolvent • After suspension, benefits much better than PBGC guarantee • Example: Service pension about $2,600 vs $1,100 guarantee • Average benefit with suspension is 80% higher than Guarantee 9

  10. Projected Plan Assets After Suspension

  11. Green Zone Plans • 65% of plans are in Green Zone1 • There are “Shades of Green” • Almost 10% of Green Zone plans are expected to migrate into the Yellow and Red Zone in the absence of actuarial gains or corrective actions by the Trustees, assuming continuation of PPA rules • Although favorable experience would decrease the percentage, unfavorable investment results and/or employment declines could increase the percentage significantly • Face significant increase in PBGC premiums. • These plans need the current tools, along with the other tools proposed in Solutions not Bailouts 1Segal Consulting’s Survey of Calendar Year Plans’ 2014 Zone Status, Spring 2014

More Related