1 / 8

The Costs of Organization

The Costs of Organization. Masten , Meehan & Snyder 1991 Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 7(1): 1-25. Jeff Savage. Theory. Firms internalize operations to mitigate imperfect contract problems due to uncertainty, bounded rationality and opportunism.

mali
Télécharger la présentation

The Costs of Organization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Costs of Organization Masten, Meehan & Snyder 1991 Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 7(1): 1-25 Jeff Savage

  2. Theory • Firms internalize operations to mitigate imperfect contract problems due to uncertainty, bounded rationality and opportunism. • However, when firms attenuate the residual claimant status of upstream transactors, they sacrifice the high-powered incentive advantages of market exchange; this demands greater investment in monitoring and administration. • In the past, theorists hadn’t paid attention to factors which influence the level of these internal organization costs. • The authors show whether and to what extent variations in internal rather than market organization costs are responsible for observed variations in organizational form.

  3. Setting—Naval Construction • Construction (as opposed to manufacturing) involves building of a single or small number of finished units. • Asset Specificity is lower—capital & equipment is less specific to a particular transaction. • The unique design & location of construction projects limits the ability to hold inventories of work in progress. • Thus, temporal specificity* may be an important source of holdups.

  4. Results

  5. Results cont.

  6. Summary • The results support some but not all of the standard transaction-cost arguments. • Temporal Specificity Can be a major determinant of organization form. • The prospect of holdups (where timeing of performance is critical) represents a significant hazard of contractual exchange. • What other industries might be characterized by temporal specificity holdup problems?

  7. Discussion • How distinct are internal and market organization costs? • Now that we are looking at internal organization costs, what effect would forming a labor union have on a firm? On an industry? • How does this paper connect with the Argyres and Liebeskind 1999 paper? Ouchi 1979? • In summary, it is important to look at both the internal organization costs, as well as the market transaction costs when we are analyzing the integration decision.

More Related