1 / 13

Interlock commissioning

Interlock commissioning. J. Wenninger AB-OP-SPS First ideas on interlock commissioning…. MPS Commissioning. MPWG aim : define approved procedures for MPS system commissioning, to be applied at LHC & SPS.  CNGS =

mallan
Télécharger la présentation

Interlock commissioning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Interlock commissioning J. Wenninger AB-OP-SPS First ideas on interlock commissioning… CNGS Comm. Comm. / J. Wenninger

  2. MPS Commissioning MPWG aim : define approved procedures for MPS system commissioning, to be applied at LHC & SPS.  CNGS = The LHC Hardware Commissioning procedures are used as guidelines to structure the MP commissioning. Tests are classified in categories : • Individual System Tests (IST) • Defined by the expert/responsible of each system. • Performed on each system in a standalone configuration. • Hardware Commissioning Tests (HCT) • Involve more than one system. • Defined by the people who are responsible for the systems that are involved. Results are documented in MTFs (Manufacturing Test Folders) within EDMS. CNGS Comm. Comm. / J. Wenninger

  3. Interlock commissioning – first steps The first steps towards the definition of test procedures have started within the MPWG on the following subjects : • Beam Interlock System (BIS) – [B. Todd] : • Commissioning is split into 4 phases. • First 2 phases  IST – BIS in standalone. • Third phase  BIS + beam dumping system. • Fourth phase  BIS + all ‘clients’.  procedure must be adapted for the transfer lines (no beam permit loop). • Transfer line interlocks – [J. Wenninger] : • Concentrate on HC and Beam Commissioning (BC) level. • ‘Rather’ complete list of tests. First (private) draft documents exist (LHC functional spec format). Next step : consistent definitions & structures. CNGS Comm. Comm. / J. Wenninger

  4. Presently confirmed interlock list Extraction channel & SPS ring : • Beam position in extraction bump (M) • Settings of orbit bumpers (M) • Beam loss in extraction channel (M) Transfer line & target : • Vacuum • Extraction kicker • TEDs & TBSEs • CNGS decay tube shutter • CNGS target assembly • Internal PC surveillance (M) • Fast current change monitor (FMCM) (M) • Magnets • Horn • Beam losses (M) • Position at target, trajectory (M) • Screen positions (M) • Hadron stop cooling (M) = maskable CNGS Comm. Comm. / J. Wenninger

  5. TL Intlk. Comm. : Who We need a IC team responsible for the commissioning. Presently : • J. Wenninger (overall coordination – I guess …) • R. Giachino • B. Puccio/B. Todd (BIS + HW links) I may drag in another SPS-OP member ( spread knowledge). Responsibility : • Verification & validation of HC & BC tests. • Documentation of test results. • ISTs : to be defined… System experts are responsible. On ‘paper’: procedures must be defined for each system. IC team must ensure that ‘minimum’ documentation exists. If necessary IC team must request some add. ISTs to be performed. CNGS Comm. Comm. / J. Wenninger

  6. ISTs & BIS connections • IST should be performed during the HC phase. • System experts are responsible for defining appropriate tests and the periods of the tests. • Each client system connection to the BIS must be tested during the HC period. CNGS Comm. Comm. / J. Wenninger

  7. HC & BC tests Mandatory conditions for HC & BC tests : • The system is connected to the BIS (connection tested). ISTs have been performed successfully. • The BIS is operational. • The control system is available (must be possible to test from CCC) : • BIS supervision. • Machine timing system (time-stamping & synchronization). • For certain systems (PCs…) : trim & diagnostics application. Optional conditions : • Logging system operational (for BIS & system under test).  test ‘tracing’ & documentation. If we insist on the ‘optional’ condition : from experience this means we have to start the tests at the very last moment, i.e. during the beam commissioning period. CNGS Comm. Comm. / J. Wenninger

  8. HC tests • HC tests do not require beam (by construction). • The majority of MPS tests are HC tests. • The system that requires the largest number of tests : power converters. • Rough & very preliminary time estimate : 4-6 shifts (non-stop !) If we do not insist on operational logging, the majority of tests can be performed during the SPS cold-checkout period, April  first/second week of May. CNGS Comm. Comm. / J. Wenninger

  9. BC tests / 1 By definition such tests must be performed during the CNGS beam commissioning period. Before extraction of the first beam : • SPS beam interlocks : • Interlock on bumped beam position @ extraction point. • Intensity interlock in SPS ring.  ~ 1 hour. • Interlocks that may be prepared in ‘advance’ : • BLM system – set rough interlock levels according to SPS experience.  ~ 1-2 hours (?). • Interlocks on BPMs will be counter-productive at this stage. CNGS Comm. Comm. / J. Wenninger

  10. BC tests / 2 Low intensity beam ‘on target’ (1-2 ×1012 p – tbd) : • BLM interlocks : • First ‘fine tuning’ of levels. • Complete test of all channels.  2-4 hours (to be confirmed). • BPM interlocks : • Full system test (each BPM).  2-4 hours (to be confirmed). • MKE kicker failures, interlocking and dump logic. • Optional (at this stage) : • Test of the FMCM (Fast Magnet Current Monitor) with beam. All tests (and thresholds) must be re-visited (subset of full test list) as the beam intensity is increased. CNGS Comm. Comm. / J. Wenninger

  11. Double-batch tests Special tests with double batch extraction : • Interlocking of second batch. • Interlock latching : • First batch  second batch. • One cycle  next cycle(s).  1-2 hours CNGS Comm. Comm. / J. Wenninger

  12. Maskable interlocks A certain number of interlock signals are maskable for safe beams (i.e. below damage threshold ~ 4-5 ×1012 p). • Automatic de-activation of masked interlock for unsafe beams must be tested. • Unknown for 2006 : will the distribution of the ‘safe beam flag’ be ready ? • If NOT : • Maskable channels may be forced to be maskable or un-maskable (all the time). Intervention by an BIS expert required for any modification. • Low intensity : masking permitted (all the time). • High(er) intensity : all interlock will be un-maskable (all the time).  Not a serious problem for commissioning (even if the flexibility is reduced).  If we have to run operational CNGS beams over the summer, we must ensure no interlock is maskable  operational ‘inefficiency’. CNGS Comm. Comm. / J. Wenninger

  13. Software interlocks The present SPS Software Interlock System (SSIS) is nearing the end of its life. A first version of the replacement system will become available in 2006 – hopefully during the CNGS commissioning period. • SSIS will not cover CNGS  rely on new system. • The priorities of the new system : CNGS and LHC TLs. • Contrary the TT20 North TLs where interlocking largely relies on SSIS, CNGS has a complete coverage by HW interlocks (exception : beam size @ T41). SW interlocking will provide : • more efficient injector cycling. • reduced SPS dump activation. • Commissioning of the SW interlock system will be required as soon as it becomes available. CNGS Comm. Comm. / J. Wenninger

More Related