1 / 20

The solar tachocline: theoretical issues Jean-Paul Zahn Observatoire de Paris

The solar tachocline: theoretical issues Jean-Paul Zahn Observatoire de Paris. Internal rotation of Sun. Importance for stellar physics.  If motions in this layer (circulation,turbulence)  transport of chemical elements (He; Li, Be, B).  Role in solar dynamo:

mandy
Télécharger la présentation

The solar tachocline: theoretical issues Jean-Paul Zahn Observatoire de Paris

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The solar tachocline: theoretical issues Jean-Paul Zahn Observatoire de Paris

  2. Internal rotation of Sun Importance for stellar physics  If motions in this layer (circulation,turbulence)  transport of chemical elements (He; Li, Be, B)  Role in solar dynamo: generation/storage of toroidal field tachocline

  3. Why is the tachocline so thin? Assumed settings (early 90's): convection + penetration establish a quasi-adiabatic stratification (2D sim. Hurlburt et al. 1986, 1994) convection + penetration adiabatic subadiabatic tachocline the tachocline (or part of it) is located below, in the stably stratified radiation zone it should spread through radiative diffusion (EAS & JPZ 1992)

  4. Governing equations (thin layer approximation) hydrostatic equilibrium geostrophic balance meridional motions - anelastic approximation transport of heat conservation of angular momentum variables separate: radiative spreading

  5. Radiative spreading boundary conditions (top of radiation zone) initial conditions at solar age (Elliott 1997)

  6. Radiative spreading - effect of (isotropic) viscosity conservation of angular momentum  t1/2  t1/4 in numerical simulations, radiative spread can be masked by viscous spread (in Sun Prandtl = /K ~10-6) Prandtl /K ~10-4 Brun & Zahn

  7. Why is the tachocline so thin? spread can be prevented by anisotropic momentum diffusion due to anisotropic turbulence (Spiegel & Zahn 1992) conservation of angular momentum Stationary solution  tachocline thickness ventilation time (Elliott 1997)

  8. Cause of turbulence? a local instability due to the () profile ? • non-linear shear instability (Speigel & Zahn 1992) • linear shear instability (due to max in vorticity) (Charbonneau et al. 1999, Garaud 2001) • linear shear instability 3D (shallow-water) (Dikpati & Gilman 2001) • linear MHD instability (with toroidal field) (Gilman & Fox 1997; Dikpati & Gilman 1999; Gilman & Dikpati 2000, 2002) • same, followed up in non-linear regime (Cally 2003; Cally et al. 2003; Dikpati et al. 2004)

  9. Consistency check: does such turbulence prevent radiative spreading i.e. does it act to reduce differential rotation ? Example: nonlinear shear instability Laboratory evidence: Couette-Taylor experiment, in regime where AM increases outwards laminar turbulent shearturbulence decreases shear: it is a diffusive process (Wendt 1933; Taylor 1936; Richard 2001) Rei=0 Reo=70,000 Geophysical evidence: in stratified turbulent media, angular momentum is transported mainly by internal gravity waves turbulence acts to increase shear: not a diffusive process (Gough & McIntyre 1998; McIntyre 2002) But what causes there the turbulence?

  10. To prevent spread of tachocline: a process that tends to smooth out differential rotation in latitude  Anisotropic turbulent transport  Magnetic torquing

  11. Can tachocline spread be prevented by fossil field ? Can tachocline circulation prevent field from diffusing into CZ? If not, field would imprint differential rotation in RZ (Ferraro’s law) (Gough & McIntyre 1998) Gough & McIntyre’s model (slow tachocline) advection of angular momentum is balanced by Lorentz torque in boundary layer of thickness  outward diffusion of field is prevented by circulation at lower edge of tachocline; yields thickness  of tachocline NB. circulation plays crucial role (neglected by Rüdiger & Kitchanitov 1997 and MacGregor & Charbonneau 1999; included in Sule, Arlt & Rüdiger 2004 )

  12. Magnetic confinement ? differential rotation imposed at top dipole field rooted in deep interior non-penetrative boundaries 2D axisymmetric (Garaud 2002) stationary solution  B = 13,000 G n = h = 4.375 1011 cm2/s  signs of tachocline confinement, but • high diffusivities required by numerics • substantial diff. rotation in radiation zone • circulation driven by Ekman-Hartmann pumping stratification and thermal diffusion added in subsequent work (cf. P. Garaud’s talk)

  13. Magnetic confinement ? Answer strongly depends on initial conditions Example with initial field threading into convection zone /K = 10-2 /h = 10-2 (Brun & Z)

  14. Back to the turbulent tachocline In most tachocline models convection and convective overshoot have been ignored Is this justified?

  15. Evidence for deep convective overshoot 3D simulations of penetrative convection (Brummell, Clune & Toomre 2002) plumes overshoot a fraction of pressure scale-height even at high Péclet number, overshooting plumes are unable to establish a quasi-adiabatic stratification (see also Rempel 2004) overshoot tachocline is located in the overshoot region

  16. A new picture of the tachocline emerges convection adiabatic overshoot tachocline subadiabatic quiet radiation zone  the tachocline is located in the overshoot region  there, main cause of turbulence: convective overshoot

  17. Modelisation of the turbulent tachocline 3D simulations (r,) induced by body force randomly-forced turbulence (of comparable energy) (Miesch 2002) turbulence reduces horizontal shear () increases vertical shear (r) • acts to stop spread of tachocline

  18. Effect of an oscillatory poloidal field (fast tachocline) 2D simulations () and Bpol(, t) imposed at top turbulent diffusivities n,h (Forgács-Dajka & Petrovay 2001, 2002) penetration depth of periodic field: (2/cyc)1/2 = 0.01 r0 for h = 109 cm2/s  a field of sufficient strength confines () to the overshoot region Bpol= 2600 G for h = n = 1010 cm2/s  substantial time and latitude dependence of tachocline thickness Subsequent work adds migrating field, meridional circulation and h(r) profile (Forgács-Dajka 2004)

  19. The new picture of the tachocline • the tachocline is the overshoot region • the tachocline is turbulent • turbulence is due to convective overshoot  no need anymore to look for another instability • AM transport is achieved through turbulence (Miesch) or/and • AM transport occurs through magnetic stresses (Forgács-Dajka & Petrovay) Fast or slow tachocline? Observations will decide !

  20. What we need to understand and to improve Gough & McIntyre model: • validation through realistic simulations all others: • improve representation of turbulent transport Spiegel & Zahn model: • establish whether such anisotropic turbulence does occur, and acts to reduce () Gilman, Dikpati & Cally MHD model: • consistency check : is () is reduced in turbulent regime Miesch's model: • why does convection act differently on AM in bulk of CZ and in overshoot region ? • apply () on top, rather than enforce it in situ Forgács-Dajka & Petrovay model: • further refine, confront with observations

More Related