1 / 16

Understanding women’s employment in Europe: the importance of class and gender. Tracey Warren

Understanding women’s employment in Europe: the importance of class and gender. Tracey Warren. Research focus. Gender and class In Britain, women in lower level occupational classes Work time Economic well-being of women at the bottom of the occupational hierarchy in Europe objective

mardi
Télécharger la présentation

Understanding women’s employment in Europe: the importance of class and gender. Tracey Warren

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Understanding women’s employment in Europe:the importance of class and gender.Tracey Warren

  2. Research focus Gender and class In Britain, women in lower level occupational classes Work time Economic well-being of women at the bottom of the occupational hierarchy in Europe objective subjective

  3. Economic well-being A The level of living perspective social policy approach - poverty Sociology sociology of work and employment: wages B Subjective indicators of quality of life satisfaction

  4. Women’s work time and EWB in Britain Women employed in lower level part-time jobs Negative repercussions for ‘Having’. low hourly wages low monthly wages. low independent financial assets. financial worries

  5. Work time and EWB The British work time regime: a polarisation between a female-dominated part-time labour market and a long hours male-dominated full-time labour market. Fagan (2001) a distinctly family-unfriendly and class bound system. Generalisability of the weak British situation?

  6. Data Wave 7 of the Users Database of the European Community Household Panel Survey. The sample aged 25-55 Work time - 1-29 hours (in the main job including any overtime); and more hours. Occupation in current job A four cell matrix : PT Manager/professional/associate professional; FT Manager/professional/associate professions; PT clerical/manual; FT clerical/manual.

  7. Economic well-being: employees’ relative earnings (current gross monthly); satisfaction with their earnings; assessments of own financial positions; assessments of household economic positions.

  8. Occupational location of female part-timers? Working short hours did not mean being concentrated in low level occupations over-represented in ‘manual/elementary’ and in clerical/service category (Britain and Austria) concentrated in manual/elementary jobs (Finland, France, Luxembourg and Spain). clerical/service work (Denmark). manual, clerical and higher level occupations (Ireland and the Netherlands) women in high level jobs were more likely to work part-time (Greece and Italy and Portugal behind them) .

  9. Monthly wages? Women in low level jobs working 1-29 hours a week lowest monthly wages of female employees in each country Relatively more wage-advantaged in Denmark and the Netherlands (63% and 61% of the median for female employees) more wage-disadvantaged in Portugal and Finland (36% and 40%).

  10. Earnings satisfied PT low level workers? Denmark most wage satisfied group Austria, Ireland and the UK similarly wage satisfied to other groups of women. Question - links between actual wages and feelings about those wages? Greece Low wage satisfaction. Italy and Spain too similarly dissatisfied as part-timers in managerial jobs. PT/FT rather than class?

  11. Households: have anything to save? Part-time low level disadvantage common Finland, Greece, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, UK. In many countries, similarly disadvantaged as full-time low level workers France, Greece, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and the UK Class not work time?

  12. Households: find it difficult to make ends meet? Part-time low level disadvantage common Austria, France, Greece, Ireland, the Netherlands, Portugal, and Spain. Close behind were full-time clerical/manual workers Exceptions? Denmark and Finland

  13. Conclusions Part-time low level workers had the lowest monthly wages, relative to their compatriots, but the intensity of wage disadvantage varied substantially. Subjective: No universal correlation between women’s relative wage positions and their earnings satisfaction More prevalent association at the level of household economies.

  14. Conclusions: individuals and households Individual or household level analysis of economic well-being? bringing the household back in? members of households as financial buffer a more detailed consideration of the ‘households’ of women needed class Indicators of a nation’s economic prosperity socio-economic structures and welfare regimes offer buffers/ cushions to those in the weakest economic positions. Denmark and Finland

  15. Conclusions: EWB Researching women workers’ economic well-being Wage levels and wage satisfaction Objective and subjective indicators of ‘Having’ material resources. Subjective measures - adaptations, aspirations and expectations. satisficing reflections on outgoings and not just incomings aspirations and situation Economic well-being in research into gender, class, family and employment

More Related