Developing an ASHP Approved Residency Program. Janet Teeters, M.S., R.Ph. Director of Accreditation Services American Society of Health System Pharmacists. Objectives. Provide examples of action you can take to develop a residency program.
01 / 62Developing an ASHP Approved Residency Program
1 / 17
Télécharger la présentation
Developing an ASHP Approved Residency Program
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation
Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement.Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien.Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.
Objectives • Provide examples of action you can take to develop a residency program. • Describe three factors that will help make your residency program a success. • Summarize the steps to have your residency program become accredited.
Questions to ask yourself? Why do you want to start a residency? What does your site have to offer? Are you & your staff ready for a major commitment to the program? This is more than just taking pharmacy students on rotation….
Residency vs Experiential Training • Experience vs exposure • Integrating knowledge, skills, abilities & attitudes to gain confidence in practice • Repetition to reinforce development • Ability to develop skills progressively • Self selected group of individuals desiring to advance their skills
How to begin? • Initial assessment • Costs of the program • Support for program • Justification • Program Design • Individuals Role • Recruitment • Accreditation
Costs of a residency program • Preceptor and program directors time • Space and equipment • Salaries and benefits of residents • Travel • Recruitment expenses • Training of Preceptors • Accreditation Fees
Gathering support • Pharmacy • Physicians • Administration • Nursing
Justification • Patient care services • Projects & programs • Medicare Pass through for post graduate medical education (if accredited) • Recruitment and retention of staff • Keeps the department contemporary • Enhance credibility within an institution
Program Design • Purpose • # residents • Structure • College affiliation, teaching opportunities • Utilization of outside experiences
Program Design • Use a systematic approach • Understand instruction • Focus on assessment & feedback • Roles & responsibilities
ASHP Residency Learning System “RLS” • Model for a systematic approach to training • Maximize learning experiences • Builds upon past experiences • Focuses on improving instruction & feedback • Provides consistency in assuring outcomes
Outcomes, Goals & Objectives Outcomes: What resident graduate should be capable of doing Goals: What resident should learn to do Objectives: Observable, measurable behavior Criteria: Detail to evaluate performance related to the objectives Outcomes Goal Goal Obj Obj Obj C C C C C C C C C
Outcome: Provide patient centered care Goal: Document patient care activities appropriately Objective: Appropriate selection of activities Objective Effectively document appropriate information Objective: Explain exemplary documentation Criteria: Written in time to be useful Criteria: Follows Hospital Policy Criteria: Legible Criteria: Only pertinent information included Criteria: Accurate interpretation
Design Learning Experiences (rotations) • Areas of expertise • Determine length, type, electives • Identify goals that match the experience • Identify goals to be evaluated during the experience • Identify learning activities to meet G&O
Design Tips: • Only offer rotations - good role models and adequate patient #s • Focus on the strengths of the site • Strong role models for early experiences • Limit the number of goals evaluated per rotation • Don’t repeat the evaluation of the same goals with every rotation if goal has been obtained • Develop effective communications between preceptors to avoid duplication of efforts
Preceptors Role Residents Learning Facilitating Culmination & integration Coaching Practical Application Modeling Direct Instruction Foundation Skills & Knowledge
Instruction Tips • Educate preceptors on how resident training varies from student training • Provide forum for preceptors to discuss effective methods they have used to learn from each other • Provide development for preceptors
Key Individuals • Residency Program Director • Preceptors • All staff
Residency Program Director Role • Overall Champion for the program • Initial assessment of entering resident • Development of resident plan • Monitoring of resident over time • Assess preceptors & be a preceptor • Assess program performance • Improvement of the program
Preceptors Role • Responsible for their experiences/rotation • Instruction • Feedback • Formative - constructive ongoing use snap shots/ criteria based checklists • Summative – at the end of an experience Attainment of G&O assigned • Receive • Improve effectiveness • Communicate to other preceptors
Overall challenges of design & implementation • Understanding the systematic approach • RPh have not been trained in educational design • Focusing on paperwork vs concept • Need to involve all preceptors in design • Takes time • Everyone needs to be educated • New staff • CQI
not exactly….Recruitment • Market yourselves! • ASHP Midyear Mtg • Students, Staff • Other residency programs in your area • Un-matched candidates post MATCH (March) • State, regional, college presentations • Brochures/ web pages • Seeking accreditation
Accreditation Acts as a catalyst to promote change and provide consistency in training A voluntary process to show a program meets national standards A means of self-regulation, using peer review
Why accreditation? • Consumer protection • Fosters continuous improvement • Public relies on accreditation for Credibility Consistency Funding Recognition
What’s involved from your side? • Program development • Resident recruitment • Application/ Reapplication • Survey visits and reports • Meeting & keeping current with standards • Constantly improving your program • Keeping your information up to date with ASHP
Accreditation application process • Read the standards & regulations • Must have a resident • Fees begin as soon as you apply • Application includes program director information • Information goes live on web site • Site visit (after 9 months) • Accreditation is retroactive to application date • On going reports
What to expect after application • Set Survey date • Self- assessment • Site survey • Correspondence in response to report • ASHP Commission on Credentialing • ASHP Board of Directors
TOP Areas of Partial/Non-compliance in Pharmacy Practice Residency training issues: 2006 2005 2004 2003 • Preceptors’ Contribution to Profession 56% 67% 58% ---- • Individualized Plan for Resident 50% 54% 47% 55% • Assessment of the Resident 44% 51% 44% 61% • Resident Self Evaluations 41% 44% 56% 61% • Progress over Time & Feedback ---- 36% 44% 55% • Document/plan for leave & impact 59% ---- ---- ---- Based on 3/03, 3/04, 3/05, 3/06 COC
TOP Areas of Partial/Non-compliance in Pharmacy Practice Pharmacy or service issues: 200620052004 2003 Sterile Products Area 66% 79% 51% 58% Safe Drug System 63% 59% 65% 74% Drug Information 47% 56% 49% 48% Based on 3/03, 3/04, 3/05, 3/06 COC
TOP areas of Partial/Non-compliance in Specialized Programs Residency training issues: 2006 2005 2004 2003 • Individualized goals/objectives 67% 56% 97% 63% • Evaluations not routinely done 48% 52% 81% ---- • Individual plan & monitored 52% 44% 94% 56% • Resident has not completed PGY1 54% 44% 32% 50% • Resident self evaluation 52% ---- 19% 44% Based on 3/03 , 3/04, 3/05, 3/06 COC
Factors related to release of new Residency Accreditation Standards • IOM reports • JCAHO Roundtable/conference • Future of Residency Training Conference • ACCP/ASHP Partnership • Open Hearings & comment periods • ACPE standards
Residency Stakeholders Conference • Accreditation by one national body that includes key stakeholders • All residencies should be accredited • Residencies help develop innovative practices • Colleges provide knowledge; residencies are becoming necessary to integrate knowledge into practice
Residency Stakeholder Conference • ↑ need for residency trained individuals by 2015 • ↑ need for community residencies • PGY1 & PGY2 is appropriate model • Terms and vision need to be consistent, defined, endorsed and embraced by the profession • Specialization in the profession needs clarity
New Standards: PGY1 Pharmacy Residency Replaces Pharmacy Practice (2001) PGY2 Pharmacy Residency Replaces Specialized Pharmacy Practice (1994) and all supplemental standards (Goals & objectives remain) Standards not altered at this time: Managed Care Pharmacy Practice Managed Care Systems Residency Pharmacy Practice (with emphasis in Community Care)
Principles of accreditation • Resident’s qualifications • Environment for learning • Resident’s responsibilities • Training program (systematic approach) • Residency Program Director & Preceptors • Organization • Pharmacy
Connexion au compte
Connectez-vous pour publier votre contenu sur SlideServe.