1 / 11

b- tagging efficiency in L+jets at 7TeV

b- tagging efficiency in L+jets at 7TeV. Hongbo Liao LPC, Clermont-Ferrand. Tag counting method.

margaret-evans
Télécharger la présentation

b- tagging efficiency in L+jets at 7TeV

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. b-tagging efficiency in L+jets at 7TeV Hongbo Liao LPC, Clermont-Ferrand

  2. Tag counting method • The number of events with n btag jets N_i depends on b tagging eb, non-b jet mistag rate enonband Fij, the fraction of number of events having i jets matching b quark and j jets not matching • Fiteband Ntot, enonband Fij fixed Cut SV0 > 8 • eb = 50.2 ± 0.7% • enon b = 1.9 ± 0.1% • Pre-selection : • Exactly 1 isolated lepton Pt>20GeV (e or µ) • At least 4 jets. 3jets Pt>40GeV+ 1 jet Pt>30GeV • Missing Et >20GeV

  3. b tagging weight of SV0, JetProb, TrackCounting and SV1+IP3D Thanks Nabil and Diane

  4. b tagging efficiency One can estimate weight cut to get such as expected 50% tagging efficiency

  5. Light jet rejection

  6. Light jet rejection vsbtag efficiency At same btag efficiency, SV1+IP3D has higher light jet rejection

  7. Fit results (without bkg) Expected : eb = 50.2 ± 0.7% N = 30.1 ± 5.5 Fit : eb = 50.3 ± 7.1% N = 30.4 ± 5.5 Track>2.5 SV0>8 JetPtob<0.001 SV1+IP3D>6 Expected : eb = 48.9 ± 0.7% Fit : eb = 49.1 ± 7.3% Expected : eb = 46.6 ± 0.7% Fit : eb = 47.0 ± 7.0% Expected : eb = 49.4 ± 0.7% Fit : eb = 49.4 ± 7.2% with bkg and more checks

  8. combinational method for Top mass • Full-Hadronic • Semi-leptonic

  9. Semi-leptonic (7TeV) Idea: find the best combination by the minimum (no fit) to define Ttbar events Here: the mean values and sigma come from the reconstructed objets whichmatched the thruth. Additionalchooses: normal method; Pt dependence; fit? Sample: 7TeV Ttbar, W+jets and Single Top samples After reconstruction:Missing Et > 20 GeV; exactly one lepton Pt>20GeV; at least 4 jets, 3jets Pt>40GeV+1jets Pt>30GeV

  10. Pre_selection + chi2<30 + weight of 1 bjet >6 S/B : 1.8 3.1 35

  11. Full-Hadronic (10TeV) Idea: find the best combination by the minimum (no fit) to define Ttbar events • Smaples: full-hadronicttbar 105204; QCD Multijet (108352-108355, 108357-108360, 108362-108371); W+jets (107681-107685,107691-107695,107700-107705) Multi-jet Triggers : 6j35_5j45_4j50_3j60, 4j35_3j45_2j50_j60, 4j45_j60, 5j45_2j60_j100, 5j45_4j60_j100,4j60_2j100_j170

More Related