1 / 23

Turbulent flow over groups of urban-like obstacles

Turbulent flow over groups of urban-like obstacles. O. Coceal 1 , T.G. Thomas 2 , I.P. Castro 2 and S.E. Belcher 1 1 Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, U.K. 2 School of Engineering Sciences, University of Southampton, U.K. 1 Email: o.coceal@reading.ac.uk

margaret-william
Télécharger la présentation

Turbulent flow over groups of urban-like obstacles

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Turbulent flow over groups of urban-like obstacles O. Coceal1, T.G. Thomas2, I.P. Castro2 and S.E. Belcher1 1Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, U.K. 2School of Engineering Sciences, University of Southampton, U.K. 1Email: o.coceal@reading.ac.uk www.met.rdg.ac.uk/bl_met

  2. Motivation and Aims • Modelling flow and dispersion in urban areas • Wider application, e.g. in engineering • Aims • To perform high resolution simulations – no turbulence modelling, no tuning • To validate simulations against a high quality dataset • To compute 1-d momentum balance for canopy of cubical roughness, and • compare with vegetation canopies • compare with rough walls in general • To compare flow within canopy with that above & understand their coupling • To investigate effect of layout of the obstacles

  3. spatial fluctuation from mean turbulent wind speed Spatial average of Reynolds-averaged momentum equation is spatially averaged mean wind speed is spatial average of Reynolds stress Compute from LES/DNS data is dispersive stress is distributed drag term See e.g. Raupach & Shaw (1982), Finnigan (2000) Spatial averaging

  4. Numerical method • Multiblock LES/DNS code developed by T.G. Thomas • Resolutions: • DNS at 64 x 64 x 64 grid points per cube (256 x 256 x 256 grid points) • 32 x 32 x 32 grid points per cube (128 x 128 x 128 grid points) • 16 x 16 x 16 grid points per cube (64 x 64 x64 grid points) • Boundary conditions: • free slip at top • no slip at bottom and cube surfaces • periodic in streamwise and lateral directions • Reynolds number = 5000 (based on Utop and h) • Flow driven by constant body force

  5. Domain set-up Domain sizes: 4h x 4h x 4h, 8h x 8h x 4h, 4h x 4h x 6h Staggered Aligned Square Obstacle density 0.25 Repeating unit

  6. Grid resolution tests

  7. Domain size tests (I)

  8. Domain size tests (II)

  9. Unsteady flow viz - windvectors

  10. Unsteady flow viz - windvectors Streamwise-vertical plane Lateral-vertical plane Streamwise vortex structures Unsteady flow very different from mean flow

  11. Unsteady flow viz - vorticity

  12. Unsteady flow viz - vorticity Streamwise-vertical plane Horizontal plane Strong, continuous shear layer Interacting shear layers Decoupling of flow ? Enhanced lateral mixing

  13. Time-mean flow - windvectors Robust recirculation upstream of cube Staggered array No recirculation bubble behind cube Divergence point near ground Steady vortex in canyon Square array More two-dimensional in nature

  14. Time-mean flow – pressure Front face Back face Pressure on back face more uniform Side face Top face Negative pressure on top face

  15. Pressure drag profile Compared with data from Cheng and Castro (2003)

  16. Mean velocity profiles Compared with data from Cheng and Castro (2003)

  17. Spatially-averaged stress budget Dispersive stress negligible above canopy cf Finnigan (1985) Cheng and Castro (2003) Dispersive stress significant within canopy

  18. Spatially-averaged stress budget 400 T 50 T Characteristic timescale T = h / u* Very large averaging times needed to average out effects of slow-evolving vortex structures (~ 400 T)

  19. Stress budget – effect of layout Dispersive stress changes sign for aligned/square arrays Due to recirculation (cf Poggi et al., 2004)

  20. Reynolds and dispersive stresses Aligned array Stress measurements above array Cheng and Castro (2003) Dispersive stresses of order 1% of total stress above array

  21. Mean velocity and drag profiles Spatially-averaged mean velocity profile Well predicted with few sampling points Much lower for staggered array Much lower for aligned/square arrays - sheltering Sectional drag coefficient

  22. Mixing length profile Velocity profile logarithmic above canopy Mixing length minimum at top of canopy Blocking of eddies by shear layer Velocity profile not exponential in canopy

  23. Conclusions • High resolution DNS of flow over cubes – excellent agreement with data • Vortex structures both above and within array • unsteady flow very different from mean flow • Strong shear layer at top of array • decouples flow within array from that within • Time-mean flow structure depends on layout • vortex in canyon for aligned/square arrays • no recirculation bubble for staggered array • Dispersive stress small above array, large within • Log profile above arrays • Mean flow and turbulence structure is different from plant canopies

More Related