50 likes | 177 Vues
This paper presents a comparative analysis of two significant research papers focusing on user-centered design methods. The first paper discusses the innovative method developed, highlighting its goals and comparing it with traditional participatory design approaches through organized tables. The second paper examines a study on diverse user groups, detailing their roles, environments, and data analysis methods. The assessment evaluates cultural independence, applicability across age groups, time consumption, and robustness of results, providing insights into the effectiveness of these design methods.
E N D
Schema for Presenting Papers For AssignmentsGray
WHICH PAPERS • Briefly introduce the two papers • Title, author • Goal of each paper
FIRST PAPER • Describe the method developed in the first paper • Compare it to other methods discussed in the apper, e.g., participatory design. For the comparision, prefer tables for organising your arguments, e.g., see below an example entry of your table
SECOND PAPER • Report the study of the second paper • Describe the • Goal • Involved types of users • Their roles • The environment • The material used (e.g., paper and pencil, book,…) • The data gathering method • The data analysis • The discussion
ASSESSMENT • Briefly recap and assess the two papers, e.g., • Are they culture independent? • Could they be used/replicated with younger/older children? • Could they be used/replicated with audults? • Could they be used/replicated with old people? • Are they time consuming? • Are the results robust or the designers/evaluators’ biases can easily compromise the results?