1 / 24

Vancouver 8 October 2008

Qualification of military flight simulators The Dutch approach Hans Jansen National Aerospace Laboratory NLR Herman Koolstra Military Aviation Authority MAA-NLD. Vancouver 8 October 2008. Chinook in brown out conditions. A Chinook in a brown out condition Very common in Uruzghan

margot
Télécharger la présentation

Vancouver 8 October 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Qualification of military flight simulatorsThe Dutch approachHans Jansen National Aerospace Laboratory NLRHerman Koolstra Military Aviation Authority MAA-NLD Vancouver 8 October 2008

  2. Chinook in brown out conditions

  3. A Chinook in a brown out condition • Very common in Uruzghan • Hard to train at home • Limited resources for training • Can it be trained in a simulator? • Can it be trained completely in a simulator? • What kind of simulator to prevent…..

  4. Military Aviation Authority -NLD • Why a Military Aviation Authority? • Separate inspection and execution • Tasks • Develop standards • Certification • Inspection (audits) • Our task: • Make standards for all Military Flight Simulators

  5. Objective: maximize training value • To reach the objective two fundamental problems must be investigated. • 1. What is the level of simulation required for a task to train that particular task completely in an FSTD? • 2. What is the minimum acceptable level (no negative training) and how much training can be done on that particular simulator.

  6. JAR Flight Simulator Training Devices (FSTD) • Full Flight Simulator (FFS) • level A B,C D • Flight Training Device (FTD) • level 1,2,3 • Flight & Navigation Procedures Trainer (FNPT) • level I, II, III,MCC • Basic Instrument Training Device (BITD) A Full Flight Simulator level D is the FSTD with the highest fidelity level, and the Basic Instrument Training Device has the lowest level, but sufficient for instrument training.

  7. Limitations of the JAR-FSTD • Requirements not clearly coupled to flying tasks • Rigid qualification • lowest subsystem determines qualification of the simulator • Training credits not always indicated • No military tasks

  8. Proposed solution • Task oriented • Sub system oriented - Human perception or technology driven?

  9. Task oriented 10

  10. Subsystem oriented 11 Instructor/operator station Visual system (image, FOV) Motion system (envelope, phase) Sound system Cockpit Performance & Control Aircraft subsystems Avionics Weather ATC / C2 Threats & targets cooperative models Integration & Correlation

  11. Basis for standards (1) • What is required for full 100% compatibility • Human limitations • Forward compatibility • Independent of present day technology

  12. Different fidelity

  13. Basis for standards(2) • What is the required minimum standard to do any training at all? • JAR • Little evidence

  14. Euclid 11.1 MASTER Errors in aerobatic training depending on previous PC training

  15. How does it look

  16. How does it look 17

  17. Training value • How much training value? • first conservative allowance • adjusted, based on experience

  18. Task list ( a piece) • Rating tasks. • Checklist • Expertise • Confirmation in a FSTD, main reason for subjective tests as well.

  19. Checklist example • Task qualification checklist ( for 100%): • Motion: • Is the task high gain or are motion inputs primary triggers: Minimum level 1 • Is the movement also multi axis: minimum level 2. • Does the task require aircraft vibration cues: minimum level is 3. • If level 2 or 3 motion is required phase difference should be less than 60 degrees during typical task execution. Phase difference of less than 30 degrees is required for 100% flight replacement.

  20. Example score

  21. Operators benefits • Each FSTD can be used. • The training per FSTD can be optimized. • Flight training can be optimized.

  22. Way ahead • Initial step is completed • FSTD-H • Second step • qualification • Third step • fixed wing. • Continuing effort • Improve the system • Biggest challenge the minimum level

  23. Question time

More Related