1 / 11

SSB – Rtk splinter session 2007-2008 perspectives

SSB – Rtk splinter session 2007-2008 perspectives. Sea State Bias and Retracking Analysis Splinter. Talks: 0930 D. Vandemark, H. Feng, N. Tran, B. Chapron, B. Beckley Inclusion Of Wave Modeling In Sea State Bias Correction Refinement

marion
Télécharger la présentation

SSB – Rtk splinter session 2007-2008 perspectives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SSB – Rtk splinter session2007-2008 perspectives

  2. Sea State Bias and Retracking Analysis Splinter • Talks: • 0930 D. Vandemark, H. Feng, N. Tran, B. Chapron, B. Beckley Inclusion Of Wave Modeling In Sea State Bias Correction Refinement • 0950 E. Rodriguez, P. Callahan, T. Lungu Cross Calibration Of TOPEX And Jason Using MAP And LSE Retracking To Improve Global Sea Level • 1010 P. Thibaut, S. Labroue, N. Granie Evaluation Of Ground Retracking Algorithms On Jason Data • 1030 BREAK • 1100 Y. Faugere, A. Olivier, P. Thibaut, G. Dibarboure, N. Picot, J. Lambin Analysis Of The High Frequency Content Of Jason-1, Topex And Envisat Data • 1120 S. Labroue, M. Ablain, J. Dorandeu, N. Tran, P. Gaspar, O.Z. Zanife Comparison Of Topex And Jason-1 Sea State Bias Models • 1140 Discussion • Posters: • SSB-P1. TOPEX Retracked GDR – Features and Statistics, Philip S. Callahan, Ernesto Rodriguez, Ted Lungu • SSB-P2. A New Altimeter Waveform Retracking Algorithm Based On Neural Networks, Arnaud Quesney, Eric Jensou, Juliette Lambin, Nicolas Picot • SSB-P3. Unsupervised Classification Of Altimetric Waveform Over All Surface Type, Arnaud Quesney, Eric Jeansou, Christian Ruiz, Nathalie Steunou, Bruno Cugny, Nicolas Picot, Jean-Claude Souyris, Sylvie Thiria, Mustapha Lebbah • SSB-P4. Sigma0 Blooms In The Envisat Radar Altimeter Data, Pierre Thibaut, F. Ferreira, Pierre Femenias • SSB-P5. Simulator Of Interferometric Radar Altimeters: Concept And First Results, Pierre Thibaut, Olivier Germain, Fabrice Collard, Bruno Picard, Laurent Phalippou, Christopher Buck OSTST Hobart 2007

  3. Questions • Do retracking approaches show reduction in SSB? • What is the approach to aligning TOPEX and Jason data? • What error model should be used with the corrected data? • We want to come to an agreement today on the reprocessing specifications for both TOPEX and Jason-1, so we can go ahead with the full reprocessing this year. OSTST Hobart 2007

  4. Jason-1 reprocessing • MLE4 retracking ready; • SSB ready ( or a new version shal be computed if orbit changes) • C-band, ionosphere: ready (additional validation should be performed) • Orbit, JMR -> see other splinters: will be ready this year • note that LSE applied on Jason does not differ sensibly from MLE4 • Jason MLE4 and Topex LSE are now very consistent: no apparent wave dependency, similar SSB models. OSTST Hobart 2007

  5. Reprocessing perspectives for TOPEX • What is ready: • LSE retracking algorithm (range, SWH, Sigma0, att, skewness or not) • Note: the skewness does not eliminate all quadrant features. • PTR characterization • What would need some additional work • SSB model (requires retracked data, orbit, corrections) • Correction for quadrant effects: 3 options: • Add a field with an empirical correction (a+b.SWH) by quadrant, the SSB field being the TOPEX global SSB • Add a field with an empirical correction (a+bSWH) by quadrant, the SSB field being the Jason-1 latest SSB model • Split the SSB model into quadrant • Alt-A SSB from agreement of 1-3 year average • MAP algorithm ? • C-band, ionospheric correction has to be validated OSTST Hobart 2007

  6. Other points • Need to investigate the leakages characteristics, as they now become the main source of error in TP/Jason consistency (~1-2cm) • MAP algorithm • Skewness set to 0 in LSE for SWH<1m => is there an impact? • Sigma 0 LSE has to be in the future reprocessed TP products; more generally, are there requirements/suggestions on the content of those products • Poseidon 1 ? OSTST Hobart 2007

  7. Use of new orbits (GRACE) Use of new orbits (GRACE) Use of new orbits (GRACE) New SSB, range, orbits Orbit : J1-CNES/TP-GSFC 4 - Impact of GSFC orbit • New orbits are provided by CNES for Jason-1(GDR ‘B’) and GSFC for TOPEX (RGDR). • Using GSFC orbits similar for Jason-1 and TOPEX, allows us to remove the East/West signal • Even if orbits are best and more homogenous between TOPEX and Jason-1, weak systematic discrepancies remain (< 1cm). -2 cm +2 cm New SSB,New ranges Orbit : J1-GSFC/TP-GSFC +2 cm -2 cm

  8. The best we can do now Orbit – Range (GSFC orbits) Delta(J-TP) 1 cm 5 cm 9 cm 5 cm 9 cm 5 mm 5 cm 9 cm 5 cm 9 cm Orbit – Range - SSB (GSFC orbits) Good global results but some sea state related signals are still there when comparing the quadrants. A SSB estimated globally on Topex cannot remove all the residual sea state dependences

  9. Jason SSB (95-131) Topex LSE (328-364) -30 cm -30 cm 0 cm 0 cm Both SSB are estimated on a full year of data. Cycles 1-21 are not enough to assess accurately the sea state variations.

  10. -3 cm +3 cm Mean crossovers SSH using MGDR GSFC orbits [cm] Mean of Topex SSH differences at Xovers: Range impact LSE & GSFC orbit • Hemispheric bias increases using LSE and MAP retracking • Since LSE retrieves 5 parameters instead of 4 (MGDR), noise on altimetric parameters is increased MGDR GSFC orbit Mean HN : -0.89 cm HS: 1.07 cm -3 cm +3 cm Mean HN : -0.58 cm HS: 0.68 cm Mean crossovers SSH using LSE & GSFC orbit [cm] MAP & GSFC orbit Mean HN : -0.93 cm HS: 1.37 cm -3 cm +3 cm Mean crossovers SSH using MAP & GSFC orbit [cm]

  11. Status • Using LSE retracking makes T/P ranges more consistent with Jason-1 ranges but residual sea state errors are still present. The errors are quadrant dependent and due to leakages in the TP waveforms. • Mean SSH differences at crossoverpoints show hemispheric bias, which increases when using retracked data instead of MGDRs (different impact of the leakages as a function of the sign of the range rate)

More Related