1 / 19

PPA 419 – Aging Services Administration

PPA 419 – Aging Services Administration. Lecture 2 – Generational Equity. Source:.

Télécharger la présentation

PPA 419 – Aging Services Administration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.


Presentation Transcript

  1. PPA 419 – Aging Services Administration Lecture 2 – Generational Equity

  2. Source: • John B. Williamson and Diane M. Watts-Roy. 1999. “Framing the Generational Equity Debate”. Chapter 1 in John B. Williamson, Diane M. Watts-Roy, Eric R. Kingson, The Generational Equity Debate (pp. 3-37). New York: Columbia University Press.

  3. Introduction • Core of the generational equity debate: • Thirty years from now it will not be possible to support the retired baby boomers at the level enjoyed by those currently retired. • Unfair to require baby boomers to support current beneficiaries at levels they will not themselves receive. • Concept of generational equity used in connection with argument that elderly are getting more than their fair share of governmental resources.

  4. Generational Equity in Historical Perspective • Early Origins of the debate • Recent incarnation of the age-old question of what share of the family and/or community resources should be consumed by the elderly. • Typically an intrafamily matter. • Conflict between young and old over food, land, and other scarce resources a common theme in historical accounts of intergenerational relations. • Food taboos often benefited the elderly. • Feudal societies: the elderly at the mercy of the young • Democracy in Athenian society reduced the role and influence of the elderly. • Colonial society: elderly poor within community cared for by a sense of solidarity, but not elderly strangers.

  5. Generational Equity in Historical Perspective • Changes in public policy affecting attitudes toward elderly in 19th century • Increase in relief and poor tax. • Change in ethnic composition. • Shift from outdoor relief to indoor relief.

  6. Shades of the Debate in the New Deal and Great Society • Most direct origins of debate in debate over passage of Social Security Act of 1935. • Old Age Assistance and Old Age Insurance • Result of epic struggle between proponents of “Social Security” vs. “Socialism”. • Advocates of the pension invoked communitarian themes: origins of dependent elder stereotype. • Advocates of the anti-pension position were frightened by the radicalism of the Townsend movement and other old age pension movements and argued about the dangers of creating a dependent generation.

  7. Shades of the Debate in the New Deal and Great Society • Between 1950 and 1970s, SSA was frequently amended, expanding coverage and benefits. • Big conflict was over health care • Truman proposed several national health insurance plans, none passed • Kennedy asked for draft bill, but only for elderly. Incremental strategy designed to overcome conservative opposition. Bill defeated. • Johnson passed after 1964 election with large Democratic majorities in Congress. But conservatives made sure providers well-compensated and made program difficult to expand to other age groups. • Put Medicare and Social Security at heart of generational equity debate.

  8. Shades of the Debate in the New Deal and Great Society • Later expansions • Older Americans Act of 1965 • Nixon • Expanded benefits • Indexing • SSI

  9. Recent Reemergence of the debate • Compassionate ageism, 1930s to 1970s • Discriminated against, poor, frail • Interpretive package that painted elderly as needy and deserving of public support. • Helped sell social policies for aging. • But changed economic circumstances prompted concerns about elderly spending. • Oil embargoes, stagflation • Decline in trust in government

  10. Recent Reemergence of the Debate • Increased skepticism about the effectiveness of government • Often fueled by effective conservative campaign by conservative think tanks.

  11. Recent Reemergence of the Debate • In 1977 Social Security faced first funding crisis. • Conservatives called it a crisis, liberals a short-term funding problem • Crisis interpretive package had several advantages for conservatives. • Given conservatives agenda to reduce welfare state, they must reduce Social Security. Best way is to undermine public confidence in program. • Liberals wished to avoid crisis framing and proposed a short-term funding solution.

  12. Recent Reemergence of the Debate • 1977 changes increased taxes and upper limit on taxable income. • Pressure for more changes led Reagan to appoint commission. • Conservatives again used crisis frame and liberals funding frame. • 1983 reforms increased retirement age. • After 1983 reforms, conservatives frame “generational equity” debate.

  13. Developments during 1990s • Proponents of generational equity framing have focused on entitlement spending, size of federal budget, and size of federal debt. • Social Security implicitly or explicitly blamed. • Generational interdependence frame focuses on tax cuts, military spending, and spending caps on domestic discretionary programs. • Means testing • Privatization

  14. Framing the Debate • Generational Equity Frame • More attention to fairness between generations. • Too much on elderly at expense of others (especially children). • Baby boomers will be heavy burden on Social Security and Medicare. • Current recipients consuming more than their fair share.

  15. Framing the Debate • Generational Equity Frame (contd.) • Every generation should provide for itself. • Key obstacle: Voting power of elderly. • To provide for elderly, must grow the economy, cut private consumption, shrink federal spending, and privatize part of Social Security. • Less emphasis on entitlement and more on work.

  16. Framing the Debate • Generational Interdependence Frame • Take into consideration the interdependence of generations when making and changing policy. • Reject idea that each generation should fend for itself. • Sharp cuts in retirement benefits will have adverse effects on adult children. • Distinct emphasis on what each generation has to offer to other generations. • Focus on intragenerational equity • Other forms of equity: racial, gender, class.

  17. Framing the Debate • Generational Interdependence Frame (contd.) • With regard to Social Security, long-term financing problem but not a crisis. • Diversity in economic circumstances among elderly. Poverty among children not directly linked. • Must control health care spending • Pursue communitarian rather than individualistic values.

  18. Values, Beliefs, and Rhetorical Strategies • Advocates must select symbolic language that shapes the appeal of particular frames and makes them look natural and comfortable. • Generational Equity Frame. • Privatization of Social Security rests on language of self-reliance and personal freedom

  19. Values, Beliefs, and Rhetorical Strategies • Generational Interdependence Frame • Redistributive goals of Social Security • Obligation to protect vulnerable groups • Fought in mass media. • Generational equity frame has advantage in the dominance of individualism in American culture.

More Related