1 / 56

McMaster Solar Car Project

McMaster Solar Car Project. Stephen Adams Marcus Baiano Susan Bunker Stephen Rettie Michael Willett. Group 805. Presentation Overview. Company History and Overview Marketing Milestones 4 P’s Target Market Marketing Problem Objectives and Goals Competitive Advantages and Disadvantages

marv
Télécharger la présentation

McMaster Solar Car Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. McMaster Solar Car Project Stephen Adams Marcus Baiano Susan Bunker Stephen Rettie Michael Willett Group 805

  2. Presentation Overview • Company History and Overview • Marketing Milestones • 4 P’s • Target Market • Marketing Problem • Objectives and Goals • Competitive Advantages and Disadvantages • Situational Analysis • Alternative Strategies • Recommended Strategy • Implementation

  3. Company History and Overview • Founded in 1998 by a small group of engineers • Fireball I completed during summer of 2001 • Entered in ASC ’01 • Currently 35 members working on Fireball II

  4. Marketing Milestones • Canadian National Auto Show • Earth Day Celebration • Santa Claus Parade • Annual Fireball Show Tour • Appearance on Canada A.M. • Received over $45,000 in sponsorship in 2002

  5. Product • Fireball II • Advertising service • Environmental image • Educational image

  6. Price • Goal of $200,000 • Monetary donation • Material donation

  7. Cash Donations

  8. Material Donations

  9. Place • McMaster University Campus • Stored at Intech International • Fireball Shows • Parades • Auto Shows • Environmental Events • Solar Challenges

  10. Promotion • $5,000 marketing budget • Canadian Auto Show • Solar Challenge 2001 • Fireball Show Tour • Website • Information Package

  11. Target Market • Environmentally conscious organizations • Educationally conscious organizations • Alumni

  12. Marketing Problem There is no marketing strategy in place to effectively and efficiently target potential sponsors to reach the goal of $200,000 by July 2003.

  13. Objective and Goals • Quantitative • Raise $200,000 through in-kind and monetary donations by February 2003 • Qualitative • Construct a solar-powered vehicle that will finish in the top ten of the 2003 American Solar Challenge • Promote environmental awarnes • Promote McMaster and the importance of education • Promote technology and innovation

  14. Competitive Advantages • Innovative school • Location • Run by volunteers

  15. Competitive Disadvantages • Lack of experience • Support from school • Poor past performance • Awareness

  16. Situational Analysis • Demand and Demand Trends • Giving Trends • Individual Giving Trends • Canada: Totaled $5.4 billion in 2000 • Ontario: Totaled $2.7 billion in 2000 • Hamilton: Totaled $136.5 million in 1997 • Education & Research: receive 8% of total # of donations, 4% of total amount • University educated are most likely to donate

  17. Situational Analysis • Giving Trends • Corporate Giving Trends • Corporate donations totaled over $975 million in 1999 • 70% of corporate funding goes to 3 types of charities: education, social service, other • 40% of corporate donations in Canada go to Ontario charities

  18. Situational Analysis • Giving Trends • Giving to McMaster University • 80% of financial donations made by corporations • Faculty of Health Sciences receives the most funding • Most corporate donations are made because of some type of affiliation with McMaster University

  19. Situational Analysis • Giving Trends • Giving to McMaster Solar Car Project • Fireball I: 95% in-kind corporate donations • Mirage: 75% in-kind corporate donations

  20. Situational Analysis • Giving Trends • Impact of September 11 • Relief donations not expected to diminish regular charitable donations • Stronger community commitment • Increase in Internet donating

  21. Situational Analysis • Social, Cultural and Demographic • Public, corporate, and government support for the environment and environmentally friendly ideas • Very little difference between giving patterns of men (75%) and women (81%)

  22. Situational Analysis • Economic and Business Conditions • Weakening economy poses biggest threat to fundraising in 2002 • Corporate giving declines, individual giving levels off • Corporations typically respond by supporting those causes they supported in the past

  23. Competition • Primary Competitors • 4 other Ontario universities • Queen’s University • University of Toronto • University of Waterloo • University of Western Ontario

  24. Competition

  25. Competition • Secondary Competitors • Other McMaster fundraising organizations • Different faculty societies (mcs, mes) • Other Ontario fundraising organizations • Ontario Clean Air Alliance

  26. Alternative Strategies • Strategy A • Alumni • Adopt-a-cell on web page • Direct address mail to adopt-a-cell offered with incentive • Two-week call back

  27. Alternative Strategies • Strategy A • Corporations • Solicit companies that may supply materials for the car • Focus on companies that have supplied parts previously to the project and the projects of other schools • Focus on the Greater Toronto Area (G.T.A.)

  28. Alternative Strategies • Strategy A • Costs • Mailing of two-sided business reply mail = $1,732.83 • Cost of long distance call backs = $573.00 • Incentive gift = $300.00 • Calling and mailing information packages to corporate material donors = $647.90 • Total Cost = $3,253.73

  29. Alternative Strategies • Strategy A • Effect on Target Market • Adds Alumni aged 55 – 64 • Includes all past donors of materials and expands throughout the G.T.A. • Adds the Internet as source of sponsorship retrieval

  30. Alternative Strategies • Strategy A • Effect on 4 P’s • Product • Adopt-a-cell program will assign individual names to cells • Price • Add new price of $20 per cell to alumni • An extensive list of all materials needed for the project will have to be developed

  31. Alternative Strategies • Strategy A • Effect on 4 P’s • Placement • No change • Promotion • Direct address mail to alumni • Incentives for alumni • Information packages to companies in the G.T.A.

  32. Alternative Strategies • Strategy A • PROS: • New market penetration • Alumni focus is on the highest giving range • Past success with corporate donation of materials • Proven success with the adopt-a-cell program • Direct mail increases awareness • Incentives will increase response time

  33. Alternative Strategies • Strategy A • CONS: • Time consuming • Limited experience in alumni market • Alumni may not read direct address mailing • New program that is not used by competition – added risk • Limited data on who the past donors of materials was • Limited contact information for corporations in G.T.A.

  34. Alternative Strategies • Strategy B • Pursue companies in the top 3 industries that donate to other schools • Energy, High Tech/Electronic, Manufacturing • Change pricing scheme • Meet with companies in G.T.A region • Hand out information packages at meetings

  35. Alternative Strategies • Strategy B • Costs: • Information packages = $504.00 • Gas = $1120.00 • Miscellaneous expenses = $600.00 • Long distance calls = $734.80 • Total Cost = $2958.80

  36. Alternative Strategies • Strategy B • Effect on Target Market • Focus on companies from the 3 main industries that give to solar car teams in the G.T.A.

  37. Alternative Strategies • Strategy B • Effect on 4 P’s • Product • New advertising structure for amounts donated (see next slide) • Price • New pricing scheme (see next slide)

  38. Alternative Strategies • Strategy B • Effect on 4 P’s • Placement • No change • Promotion • Meeting at corporate offices • Information package handouts

  39. Alternative Strategies • Strategy B • PROS: • Well-defined target market • Reaches large financial holders • More comparable in price to other cars • Customer rapport • Feedback available

  40. Alternative Strategies • Strategy B • CONS: • High risk market • May conflict with current sponsors donations • Directly competing with other solar cars • High financial and time costs • Minimized market • Lack of trained salespeople

  41. Alternative Strategies • Strategy C • Focus on Corporations that have sponsored McMaster in the past • Promote to alumni through the alumni magazine; The McMaster Times • Advertise on the student calendar for fundraising and recruitment purposes

  42. Alternative Strategies • Strategy C • Costs • Wall poster advertisement = $1,200.00 • McMaster Times magazine ad = $2,180.00 • Information Packages for top 200 corporate supporters of McMaster = $1,512.00 • Total Cost = $4,892.00

  43. Alternative Strategies • Strategy C • Effect on Target Market • Exploit past sponsors of McMaster • All age groups of alumni get exposure • McMaster students are used for both fundraising and recruiting • Families of alumni will receive exposure

  44. Alternative Strategies • Strategy C • Effect on 4 P’s • Product • Alumni receive name on website • Tax Benefit • Price • Any price is acceptable for individual donors • No change to corporation pricing • Generosity from students

  45. Alternative Strategies • Strategy C • Effect on 4 P’s • Placement • No Change • Promotion • Advertising on student calendars • Advertising in McMaster Times magazine

  46. Alternative Strategies • Strategy C • PROS: • Increase student and public awareness • New market penetration (alumni) • Proven success in corporate sector • Availability of contact information for corporate and alumni • Magazines reach a lot of people

  47. Alternative Strategies • Strategy C • CONS: • Corporations may already be satisfied with their previous donation • New market risk • Advertisement waste in magazines • Low disposable income among students • No benefits for a student donation

  48. Recommended Strategy • Strategy A • Alumni • New market with a high affiliation to McMaster • Direct mail is an effective donation technique • Minimize wasted coverage • Increases awareness

  49. Recommended Strategy • Strategy A • Corporate • Past trend of corporate giving of materials • Networking opportunities • Time efficiency and resource expense • Broad market

More Related