1 / 10

UN/CEFACT Lyon, TBG6 Meeting

UN/CEFACT Lyon, TBG6 Meeting. TBG17 Report for TBG6 Korean Delegation, 27 th Sep. 2005. TBG17 (Membership). Voting Members TBG WGs and other Forum Groups International Organizations Standards User Groups Cross-domain Officers General Membership Participants or Observers.

marvin
Télécharger la présentation

UN/CEFACT Lyon, TBG6 Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. UN/CEFACTLyon, TBG6 Meeting TBG17 Report for TBG6 Korean Delegation, 27thSep. 2005

  2. TBG17 (Membership) • Voting Members • TBG WGs and other Forum Groups • International Organizations • Standards • User Groups • Cross-domain • Officers • General Membership • Participants or Observers

  3. TBG17 (Submitters) Internal Each TBG group should have at least one representative on TBG17 This representative is responsible for providing details and feedback to the TBG group they represent • External • International Standards Organizations • International or regional User Groups • Governmental Organizations

  4. TBG17 Documents • TBG17 Terms of Reference Ver1.0 (March 2004) • General Procedures Document Ver1.0 (August 2004) • P1, BP and CC Project Proposal Ver1.0 (January 2004) • Submission Assessment Checklist Ver1.0 (October 2004) • Submission Guideline and Procedures Ver1.0 (October 2004) • TBG Library of Core Components ; Released CC Library ( 25 January 2005) • Submission Template Ver1.1 (February 2005) • Change Request Template (February 2005) • TBG17 Requirements for Additions to RSM (February 2005) • Controlled Vocabulary (February 2005)

  5. TBG17 Harmonizing Procedures 1. The workbook template distributed by TBG17 is the required format for submissions 2. TBG WG submmit to TBG17 RSM - Based on CCTS of last version (2.01 currently) - Additional background information : Use Cases, Activity Diagrams, and Class Diagrams are requested 3. TBG17 harmonizing - Consensus is preferred - If consensus is not possible, votes may be taken. 4. Feedback of harmonization result to submitters

  6. Initail TBG17 Submissions • Submissions : 2,486 BIEs from 11 groups (July, 2004)

  7. Status of TBG17 Submissions(1) • Official Outputs : 49 ACCs, 307 BCCs and 117 ASCCs (25th Jan. 2005) • No official harmonization for RSM including BIEs, BRS, etc • I am not sure that those are approved as TBG17’s roles except CC library • Official Status of TBG6 • First business standard (BRS ver1, e-tendering in Works domain except BOQ) was approved under the CCs of latest version • New BIEs (BOQ, Goods & Services domains including 20 new ACCs) were submitted to TBG17 in Mar. 2005 • Current Status of TBG17 : Quality Assurance Actions since Mar. 2005 • 57 ACCs, 461 BCCs, and 222 ASCCshave been discussed (Sep. 2005) • * refer to “QA Actions.xls” • Current Status of TBG6 submission • 17 ACCs, 38 BCCs, and 10 ASCCs from TBG6 e-Tendering BRS ver1 were discussed again in the list

  8. Status of TBG17 Submissions(2) □ Table for the Status • * Candidate list of modification according to the newly released library after QA result • Must reflect them in Ver2 including BOQ, etc • Must follow them in case of new projects

  9. Status of TBG17 Submissions(3) □ Sample of QA Distribution vs. TBG6 Draft 7 (ver1) • Red font-type identifies different term. • Refer to “CC_status_TBG6_QA.xls” for details □ QA action’s viewpoint 1) Identify typo's and spelling errors. 2) Check all acronyms are spelled out. 3) Check harmony between definition and cardinality. 4) Check to ensure all fields are filled out. 5) Check to ensure that definition is in accordance with template. 6) Identify discrepancies between definition and object class, property term, and representation term

  10. Status of TBG17 Submissions(4) □ Issues about the QA Action • Most of revisions could need just the editorial work • We need rearrange our BIEs according to the new library, for example, rearrangement for the ‘Process. Details’ because of adding new independent ‘Tendering Process. Details’ • “Guarantee..” needs the further study

More Related