1 / 30

Nonlinear model-based control of two-phase flow in risers by feedback linearization

Nonlinear model-based control of two-phase flow in risers by feedback linearization Esmaeil Jahanshahi, Sigurd Skogestad, Esten I. Grøtli Norwegian University of Science & Technology (NTNU). 9th IFAC Symposium on Nonlinear Control Systems – September 4 th 2013, Toulouse. Outline.

marygmitchell
Télécharger la présentation

Nonlinear model-based control of two-phase flow in risers by feedback linearization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Nonlinear model-based control of two-phase flow in risers by feedback linearization Esmaeil Jahanshahi, Sigurd Skogestad, Esten I. Grøtli Norwegian University of Science & Technology (NTNU) 9th IFAC Symposium on Nonlinear Control Systems – September 4th 2013, Toulouse

  2. Outline • Introduction • Motivation • Modeling • Solution 1: State estimation & state feedback • Solution 2: Output linearization • Experimental results • Controllability limitation

  3. Introduction * figure from Statoil

  4. Slug cycle (stable limit cycle) Experiments performed by the Multiphase Laboratory, NTNU

  5. Introduction • Anti-slug solutions • Conventional Solutions: • Choking (reduces the production) • Design change (costly) : Full separation, Slug catcher • Automatic control: The aim is non-oscillatory flow regime together with the maximum possible choke opening to have the maximum production

  6. Pt,s PC uz PT Motivation Problem 1: Nonlinearity Additional Problem 2: Unstable zero dynamics (RHP-zero) for topside pressure

  7. Modeling

  8. Modeling: Simplified 4-state model Choke valve with opening Z x3, P2,VG2, ρG2 , HLT P0 wmix,out L3 x1, P1,VG1, ρG1, HL1 x4 L2 h>hc wG,lp=0 wL,in wG,in w x2 wL,lp h L1 hc θ State equations (mass conservations law):

  9. Experiments 3m

  10. Bifurcation diagrams Experiment Subsea pressure Top pressure Gain = slope

  11. Nonlinear observer K State variables PT Solution 1: observer & state feedback uc uc Pt

  12. High-Gain Observer

  13. State Feedback Kc : a linear optimal controller calculated by solving Riccati equation Ki : a small integral gain (e.g. Ki = 10−3)

  14. Experiment High-gain observer – top pressure measurement: topside pressurevalve opening: 20 %

  15. Fundamental limitation – top pressure Measuring topside pressure we can stabilize the system only in a limited range RHP-zero dynamics of top pressure

  16. Experiment High-gain observer – subsea pressure measurement: topside pressurevalve opening: 20 % Not working ??!

  17. Chain of Integrators • Fast nonlinear observer using subsea pressure: Not Working??! • Fast nonlinear observer (High-gain) acts like a differentiator • Pipeline-riser system is a chain of integrator • Measuring top pressure and estimating subsea pressure is differentiating • Measuring subsea pressure and estimating top pressure is integrating

  18. Nonlinear controller PT PT Solution 2: feedback linearization Prt uc

  19. Cascaded system

  20. Pipeline subsystem ISS Hypothesis 1. The Pipeline subsystem with the riser-base pressure, Prb, as its input is “input-to-state stable”.

  21. Stability of cascade system Riser Proposition 2. Let hypothesis 1 holds. If the Riser subsystem becomes globally asymptotically stable under a stabilizing feedback control, then the pipeline-riser system is globally asymptotically stable. Proof : We use conditions for stability of the cascaded systems as stated by Corollary 10.5.3 of Isidori (1999).

  22. Stabilizing controller for riser subsys. Riser dynamics: System equations in y coordinates:

  23. Stabilizing controller for riser subsys. exist and are continuously differentiable. is a diffeomorphism on

  24. Stabilizing controller for riser subsys. System in normal form: Feedback controller: (1) Reduces to . By choosing , we get exponentially stable

  25. Stabilizing controller for riser subsys. If we insert the control law into (2) we get exponentially fast, Since , K1is bounded and will remain bounded. This is partial exponential stabilization of the system with respects to . (Vorotnikov (1997))

  26. Stabilizing controller for riser subsys. Final control law by linearizing y1 dynamics, equation (1): In the same way by linearizing y2 dynamics, equation (2): Control signal to valve: y2 is non-minimum phase

  27. Experiment CV: riser-base pressure (y1), Z=30%

  28. Experiment CV: riser-base pressure (y1), Z=60% Gain:

  29. Experiment CV: topside pressure (y2), Z=20% y2 is non-minimum phase

  30. Conclusions • Nonlinear observers work only when measuring topside pressure • This works in a limited range (valve opening of 20%) • Nonlinear observers fail when measuring subsea pressure • New controller (without observer) stabilizes system up to 60% • World record (on our experiment)! Tie with gain-scheduled IMC • But cannot bypass fundamental limitations: • non-minimum-phase system for topside pressure • Small gain of system for large valve openings Thank you!

More Related