1 / 17

Federal Aviation Administration Supplier Control Audit (SCA)

Federal Aviation Administration Supplier Control Audit (SCA). Presented by: Ed Bayne Boeing Enterprise and Industry Interface Representative Prepared by: Brian Simons Boeing Oversight Representative. What is an SCA?. FAA Order 8120.2, Part 3, section 124. Certificate Management Activity:

massimo
Télécharger la présentation

Federal Aviation Administration Supplier Control Audit (SCA)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Federal Aviation AdministrationSupplier Control Audit (SCA) Presented by: Ed Bayne Boeing Enterprise and Industry Interface Representative Prepared by: Brian Simons Boeing Oversight Representative

  2. What is an SCA? • FAA Order 8120.2, Part 3, section 124. Certificate Management Activity: • Certificate management activity will be focused on the Production Approval Holder’s (PAH) control of its suppliers. • The FAA will determine if a PAH (e.g. The Boeing Company) is complying with its supplier control system by performing the following activities: • b. Supplier Control Audit. The Principle Inspector (PI) will determine that the supplier complies with purchase order and/or quality requirements.

  3. What is an SCA? (Cont.) • FAA Order 8120.2, Part 6. Supplier Control Audit, section 139. General: • A SCA is conducted as part of the Certificate Management of the PAH (e.g. The Boeing Company PC700). • Evaluates the outside sources’ (e.g. supplier) system to control parts, materials, supplies, and services. • The SCA determines that the supplier complies with purchase order and/or quality requirements, including any statistical sampling that may be utilized.

  4. What are the results of an SCA? • FAA Order 8120.2, Part 3, section 125. Determination of Supplier Control: • The PI determines whether a PAH is controlling its suppliers by reviewing the results of the supplier control audits. • The PI looks for evidence that may indicate a system breakdown in supplier control by the PAH. • Corrective action is requested for a system breakdown.

  5. What are the results of an SCA? (Cont.) • If the FAA identifies evidence indicating a system breakdown in supplier control, a Letter of Investigation (LOI) or Surveillance Evaluation Report (SER) is issued to the PAH. • LOI vs. SER depends on the severity of the issue(s) • The LOI/SER informs the PAH that the FAA is investigating the matter. • The LOI/SER describes each of the identified nonconformances as follows: • Required Condition (e.g. AS9100 requirement, supplier procedure, etc.) • Encountered Condition (e.g. “PAH failed to ensure AS9100…was implemented at supplier”) • Example (e.g. specific evidence collected during SCA: un-calibrated inspection tools, past due internal audits or management reviews, incomplete corrective action, missing training records, etc., etc., etc.)

  6. What are the results of an SCA? (Cont.) • The PAH is requested to provide a response containing: • Additional evidence or statements addressing the conditions or examples • Mitigating circumstances relevant to the case • Nonconformance cause, and action to correct and prevent recurrence • Response is typically due within 20 working days, upon receipt of LOI This language sounds like legalese, because it is!

  7. What are the results of an SCA? (Cont.) • The PAH, and it’s suppliers, are required to maintain a quality management system per Code of Federal Regulations, 14 CFR 21.165. • The PAH’s Production Certificate is at risk during every SCA • The PAH is at risk for civil penalties stemming from LOIs • By law, 14 CFR 13.14; Each violation is subject to civil penalty of not more than $25,000 per occurrence. (i.e. each individual bolt improperly torqued, each part improperly heat treated)

  8. What are the results of an SCA? (Cont.) • Past supplier Issues resulting in a civil penalty have included: • Special Manufacturing Processes (9100 clause 7.5.2) – Improper Heat Treating • Design Control (clause 7.3) – Revision Control of Drawings & Specifications, Parts Manufactured Without Proper Engineering Approval • Material Control (clause 8.3) – Level of Control Over Non-conforming Product – Parts Not Properly Identified for Scrap • Tool & Gauge Control (clause 7.6) – Non-compliance of Calibration/Certification System • Inspection System (clause 8.2.4) – Control of Sampling System (Lack Training, Audits) • Manufacturing Control (clause 7.5.1) – Inadequate Work Instructions • Certifications (clause 6.2.2) – Employees Not Properly Certified Performing Operations

  9. Why should the Certification Bodies (CBs) and their auditors care about SCA results? • PAH supplier approval is based on 9100 certification recognition • The majority of tier 1 and tier 2 aerospace suppliers are 9100 certified • The supplier QMS processes assessed during the SCA are the same ones assessed by the CB during initial and surveillance activity • FAA verbal comment following a recent SCA audit, regarding a certified supplier that did not have an established FAI process, per AS9100 clause 8.2.4.2 requirements: “He (FAA auditor) is concerned that they are CRB approved and it apparently wasn’t identified as an issue by the approving CRB”

  10. SCA Statistics (The Big Picture Show) • FAA supplier control audits conducted at Boeing Commercial Airplane (BCA) division suppliers from October 2005 through March 2007: • 52 clients (9100 certified suppliers) • 28 domestic / 24 non-domestic clients • 21 clients had at least 1 identified QMS nonconformance • 40% of total • 86 total nonconformances identified • Average per client: 4 • Top client: 9

  11. SCA Statistics (The Good, The Bad, The Ugly)

  12. SCA StatisticsTop Nonconforming 9100 Clauses • FAA SCAs conducted at BCA division suppliers from October 2005 through March 2007: • 7.5.1 Control of Production and Service Provision (13) • 8.2.4 Monitoring and Measurement of Product (8) • 8.2.4.2 First Article Inspection (7) • 7.5.1.1 Production Documentation (6) • 7.5.5 Preservation of Product (6) • 4.2.3 Control of Documents (5) • 4.2.1 Documentation Requirements (4) • 4.2.2 Quality Manual (4)

  13. 7.5.1 Control of Production and Service Provision • Production work order issues: • Obsolete/inaccurate drawing and specification call-out • Missing or omitted manufacturing/inspection operation entries • Different part counts between operations (Part accountability) • Manufacturing/inspection practice does not match operation instruction • Manufacturing practice does not meet engineering/specification requirements • Recommendations for CB auditor: • Increase audit time in manufacturing/inspection areas • Increase production work order sample size during audits • Review for part accountability, required entries, evidence of operation completion • Compare work order to drawing/specification requirements • Witness manufacturing/inspection practice vs. work order, drawing, specification, instruction, etc.

  14. The Loud and Clear Message • Aerospace QMS certification/registration scheme: • The FAA allows the PAH to use other-parties to perform supplier assessments, surveillance, and certification. It is an earned privilege, not guaranteed. • FAA perception of effectiveness is based on facts collected during SCA activity • Certification body management and auditor responsibilities: • Ensure theintegrity of the audit process and the validity of the issued certificate • Recognize the inherent conflict of interest perception (Clients pay for certificates) • Demonstrate ethical behavior to build trust and confidence with the PAH and FAA (i.e. no soft grading of nonconformances, thorough CA verification, etc.) • CB auditor’s role is critical for PAH’s Certificate Management

  15. Proposed Process Improvements • Direct communication of SCA results from PAH to responsible CB • OASIS feedback loop • Formal PAH report (e.g. Boeing Strengths and Issues document) • Participation by CB in LOI corrective action response • Participation of CB auditor, along with PAH personnel, during a SCA • Direct communication of SCA results to accreditation body (e.g. ANAB) for CB oversight planning and auditing activity

  16. The Reality of the Civil Aviation Industry....... PAH and FAA personnel: • Are not as constrained by audit agendas/plans or time during their audit activity • Audit trails can be methodically followed and investigated, allowing greater possibility of exposing process nonconformances • Spend the majority of audit time focused on manufacturing/inspection processes Shouldn’t the Certification Body Personnel: • Ensure audit planning policies and CB/Client agreements meet the intent of AS9104 clause 8.2.2 Duration of Assessment: • It is anticipated that the requirements of the AQMS Standards shall add on-site assessment time • Justify and utilize additional on-site assessment time to emphasize manufacturing/inspection documentation, personnel competence, and process conformance

  17. Supplier Control Audit - SCA • Questions or clarifications? • Comments? • Discussion? • Email feedback to brian.d.simons@boeing.com • FAA CFR's and Orders:http://www.faa.gov/

More Related