SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Analysis of Election Campaign Financing in Serbia (2006/2007): Transparency & Reporting Challenges

matia avatar
19 diapositives · 332 Views · Sep 01, 2014

This report summarizes the state of election campaign financing in Serbia as of February 9, 2007. It highlights the challenges related to the transparency of campaign financing, including the reluctance of the Regulatory Body (RBA) to modify its rules or disclose campaign finance reports. The report examines the allocation of budget assets, expenses related to advertisements across various media, and the obligations of political parties concerning campaign finance. Key sources of information include media reports, political parties, and specialized agencies.

Analysis of Election Campaign Financing in Serbia (2006/2007): Transparency & Reporting Challenges - slide 1
01 / 19Analysis of Election Campaign Financing in Serbia (2006/2007): Transparency & Reporting Challenges
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Analysis of Election Campaign Financing in Serbia (2006/2007): Transparency & Reporting Challenges
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Election campaign financing2006/2007 Transparency - Serbia February 9th2007

  2. Communication with state organs • Representative of REC stated about unwillingness of that organ to change its Rules of procedure at this moment and to publish content of reports on campaign financing; and on the other side, readiness to perform report verifying and to bring misdemeanor procedures • RBA didn’t respond to question in which way will they check if the broadcasters fulfilled obligation to treat participants of the election campaign equally (e.g. if the broadcasters offered same conditions for advertising to all political parties) – according to available information RBA won’t collect data on that, they will only react to complaints of some interested entity • Ministry of Finances in short period of time delivered information on allocation of budget assets

  3. Research methodology • Focus on data which should separately be stated in reports as campaign expenses • Comparing with data from official reports (when they become available) • Source of information: Specialized agencies, engagedobservers, data from media, “insider” information – political parties, media, businessmen, marketing experts

  4. Collected data Collected data: • Commercials broadcasted on national televisions • Rented media space on national televisions • Adds published in Belgrade newspapers • Estimation of the number of rented billboards • Estimation of the price of printing and distribution of posters, pamphlets and promo materials Data that TS is currently collecting: • Expenses of renting conference premises and sport halls • Expenses of advertising in local media

  5. Budget financing • According to decision on using the assets from budget reserve for financing of campaign 323. 026.000 RSD was secluded from the budget. • First share of assets (in equal amounts, 3,230.026 RSD) was paid on January 19th 2007 • Second share of assets, according to number of gained mandates, and on the bases of information determined by REC, was paid on January 30th 2007. • Consequences of repeating the elections: if it comes to change in the number of gained mandates, amount of allocation will be changed • Obligation of the parties from article 10, para 3 of the Law: If the funds paid pursuant to provision of Article 1 of this Article exceed the amount of funds spent for the election campaign up to election day, the difference shall be returned to the budget of the Republic of Serbia, and/or territorial autonomy unit and local self-government unit, within ten days from the day of payment. Deadline for refunding the assets expires today!

  6. Limitations • Which is the limit for expenditures in election campaign: one that could be for all the participant of the elections is 64.605.200 + 3,230.026 RSD • Largest donation allowed for single legal entity is 1.292.104 RSD • Largest donation for single physical person allowed is 323.026 RSD

  7. Allocation of assets from the budget

  8. TV commercials’ duration and estimation of their price

  9. Duration of TV commercials and estimation of their price

  10. Estimation of minimum price paid for TV commercials

  11. Duration and estimation of value of rented TV space

  12. Duration and estimation of value of rented space

  13. Estimation of value of rented TV space (in million of RSD)

  14. Amount and estimation of the price of advertising in printed media

  15. Amount and estimation of advertising in printed media

  16. Estimation of minimum price paid for advertising in newspapers

  17. Billboard advertising • Calculated expenses of rent, besides which there are expenses of printing and installing (between 2 and 30 thousand euros per list) • TS on the bases of samples estimated total number of rented billboards by weeks; that number is multiplied with average price of one week’s rent • Amount of assumed discount is calculated on the bases of discount that Government of Serbia got for advertising in referendum campaign

  18. Estimation of price for renting billboards with discount

  19. Estimation of expenses of billboard rent with discount