1 / 53

Square-Kilometre Array

Square-Kilometre Array. The Next Generation Radio Telescope http://www.atnf.csiro.au/SKA Dr Peter J Hall Australia Telescope National Facility CSIRO SKA Program Leader. Presentation Outline. Radio astronomy and radio telescopes Motivation for building the SKA SKA concept and design goals

matia
Télécharger la présentation

Square-Kilometre Array

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Square-Kilometre Array The Next Generation Radio Telescope http://www.atnf.csiro.au/SKA Dr Peter J Hall Australia Telescope National Facility CSIRO SKA Program Leader

  2. Presentation Outline • Radio astronomy and radio telescopes • Motivation for building the SKA • SKA concept and design goals • key characteristics • Ideas for SKA realization • reflectors, arrays, lenses, signal processing • interference mitigation • site selection • Design and technology challenges • Australian and international aspects of the SKA project

  3. Radio Astronomy • Begun in 1930s by Karl Jansky - a Bell Labs communications engineer • Developed in 1940s by Grote Reber, a US radio engineer and radio amateur • Became respectable in late 1940s. Australia was an early player and has remained a world leader • Has provided insight into the most fundamental questions, e.g. • 3 K big bang background radiation (communications engineers again) • general relativity (binary pulsars) • Gives access to physical conditions unattainable in labs • Australia is good at astronomy, and RA in particular • DISR impact studies

  4. Radio Astronomy • RA derives information about the Universe from the study of natural radiation in the range ~ 10 MHz - 1000 GHz • Radio telescopes use the combination of an antenna and receiver to form a radiometer - a device for measuring the radiation temperature of a distant region of space viewed by the antenna beam • The received radiation may be continuum (broadband noise) or spectral line (“quasi-cw”) in character; variation on timescales of milliseconds to years may be involved • The measured temperature may or may not be the physical temperature of the region, depending on whether the emission is thermal or non-thermal

  5. Radio Telescopes • Can be: • single continuous aperture (e.g. parabolic dish) • focussing (wavefront delay) done optically • synthesized aperture (e.g. array) • focussing done using time delay electronics • can make huge effective aperture • mathematically manipulate wave interference patterns between array elements to simulate continuous aperture • Sensitivity depends on total collecting area of aperture • Angular resolution depends on linear extent of aperture (micro-arcsecond attainable) • Typically use very low-noise receivers (e.g. cryogenically cooled)

  6. $$$ Computer Dishes and Arrays New paradigm: wavefront sensors and software replace steel (Steel) Physical Aperture $$$ (computers) Synthesized Aperture

  7. Major ATNF Radio Telescopes • 64 m Parkes dish; 6 x 22 m AT Compact Array; both upgraded substantially to maintain international competitiveness

  8. Radio Images Using the ATCA SN1987a NGC1808 PKS2356-61

  9. Radio Telescopes of the Future • HEMT receivers • Wide-band, cheap, small and reliable • Need to build low-noise systems with many elements • Focal planes arrays • N beams => N-fold increase in telescope speed (and data rate!) • Greatly improve calibration schemes and imaging dynamic range • Synthesised beams and illumination patterns to overcome problems of feed packing • Interference rejection • Adaptive nulling and RFI cancelling can work in single dishes and arrays • More computing capacity • Computing power doubles every 18 months (Moore’s Law) • Era of software-defined radio telescopes is upon us

  10. Square Kilometer Array - Why? • Current large telescope technology dates from 1960/70’s • VLA total area ~ 104 m2 • Era of facilities upgrades approaching its end • Large increase in sensitivity is needed (100x), telescopes not receiver noise limited ==> 1 km2 collecting area • epoch of first stars and galaxies • major advance in many other areas of astronomy (and hence physics) • New challenges: • cost ($US600 m cf ~ $US50 m for ATCA) • frequency coverage • man-made interference • completion by ~2010 • Technology shift will be required

  11. Radio Telescope Sensitivity SKA

  12. Core Issue HST VLA

  13. Solution HST SKA

  14. Astronomy Beyond the Light COBE satellite NASA “Primordial soup” - matter and energy radio ? Square-Kilometre Array “Dark Ages” - before the stars Early galaxies - stars light up light Hubble Space Telescope NASA / ESA

  15. SKA: Selected “Other” Astronomy • Active Galactic Nuclei • does every ‘normal’ galaxy contain a black hole? • Magnetic fields • Faraday rotation studies of Milky Way, intergalactic medium and nearby galaxies • Radio emission from hot and cool stars • including imaging surfaces and atmospheres of giant stars • Radio after-glows of gamma-ray bursts • merger of a neutron star pair? • Pulsars • first demonstrated existence of extra-solar planets and gravitational waves; explicit demonstrations of general relativity • future use in timing standards; interplanetary navigation; cosmological background of gravity waves • Deep space network tracking; SETI

  16. SKA: The Concept • One square km radio telescope (SKA) in 2010 • 2005 technology choice • 2007 construction • 2012 operations • Frequency range 0.3 - 12 GHz (minimum) • Sensitivity 100 x VLA • need ~ 68 dB K-1 at 1.4 GHz • Multibeam essential at lower frequencies • Need innovative design to reduce cost • International funding unlikely to exceed $US600m • 106 sq metre => ~$500 / sq metre • cf VLA $10,000 / sq metre • GMRT $1,000 / sq metre

  17. SKA Top-Level Specifications

  18. Sky Key CharacteristicsOperating Frequency

  19. 1kT 20cm 1kT 6cm HST FOV mmA FOV SKA Key CharacteristicsField of View 20 Mpc at z = 0.3

  20. SKA Key CharacteristicsConfiguration 20 km Array Station 200 km

  21. SKA Key CharacteristicsMultibeaming 16 Synthesized beams 12 Station antenna patterns 8 Element antenna pattern 4 NFRA 1998

  22. SKA - Multiple Station Concept 1000km (Courtesy NFRA)

  23. Large Reflector SKA • Need revolution in construction technique before conventional large steerable dishes could be used • Chinese have suggested multiple Arecibo (‘holes in ground’) approach

  24. SKA - Large Adaptive Reflector

  25. Tile Array SKA

  26. Luneburg Lens SKA

  27. Luneburg Lens Focussing • Plane waves incident from left • 1 m diameter lens, 2 GHz radiation • Classical Luneburg - focus on surface (Image courtesy Dr Andrew Parfitt, CTIP)

  28. Luneburg Lens - The Loss Issue

  29. Luneburg Lens - Alternative SKA Implementation

  30. SETI Institute - 1hT

  31. SKA Signal Processing - Reality Check • Can we expect to be able to process the signals from an array as vast as the SKA? • Look at the growth in computation power per unit (area, dollar…) • familiar as Moore’s Law

  32. Moore’s Law - Astronomical Correlators Year (Roughly doubles every two years)

  33. SKA Signal Processing - Rough Guide • To correlate 106 antennas, over a 500 MHz bandwidth, with 104 frequency channels needs ~ 1012 Giga ops/sec • In 2010 astronomical correlators will be capable of ~107 Giga ops/sec • must aggregate SKA antennas prior to correlation • can only correlate ~4000 ‘elements’ • with 100 stations, each station can have ~40 clusters of antennas • with 400 Luneburg Lens station, combine 10 lenses per cluster • If we wait until 2020, can reduce aggregation by ~3 • but only if Moore’s Law holds!

  34. SKA - Interference Mitigation • Why? • SKA needs to observe outside (small) designated astronomy bands to meet its scientific objectives • SKA sensitivity is unprecedented (~100 times VLA) • each beam ~ 10mJy in 1 sec OR ~ -265 dBW/m2/Hz (128 MHz continuum bandwidth) • terrestial transmissions will be a problem for all but a few sites on Earth • satellite transmissions are now globally pervasive (intentional constellation coverage for many LEOs) • How? • No single IM solution; need a hierarchy of techniques starting with telescope site and environment, and ending with astronomy data processing

  35. Terrestrial Interference FORTÉ satellite: 131 MHz

  36. Global InterferenceFrom The Sky - An Example These peaks also change frequency as the satellite moves across the sky Signal levels of brightest* celestial radio sources Signal strength ITU permitted average level MHz ITU frequency allocation to Radio Astronomy * Signals from early Universe are 100 billion times weaker IRIDIUM satellite: measured 1998

  37. SKA Interference Mitigation Essentials • Effective • Robust • Versatile: different observing modes, different techniques (or different emphases in hierarchy) • e.g. snapshot versus synthesis imaging modes; pulsar modes • Low toxicity • removing the interference must not ruin the astronomy data, nor turn easy-to-identify spurious signals into hard-to-identify artifacts • bear in mind the imaging dynamic range needed in the SKA is >106 so uncorrected fiddling with imaging beams may be disastrous

  38. SKA Interference Mitigation Hierarchy • Location of instrument (esp. central cluster), and legislated or regulated radio quiet zone • Array configuration (use power of correlation processing for as much critical science as possible) • Choice of concentrators and feeds • Design of (cheap) high-intercept MMIC low-noise amplifiers • Placement of RF/IF filters for high-level, fixed frequency RFI (e.g. photonic fibre filters) • “High” resolution quantizers and first-level digital filters • DSP adaptive techniques (exploiting SKA buffer?) • New image and time-domain processing techniques

  39. AT Compact Array data Russian GLONASS satellite + two frequency markers + astronomy signal in passband Off-line digital adaptive filtering by Steve Ellingson, Electrosciences Lab OSU On-line (real-time) realizations possible Much synergy with military and commercial users Practical Interference Mitigation

  40. SKA Site Selection

  41. Australia - Terrestial Transmitters

  42. WA Site Search Area

  43. Australian SKA Configuration?

  44. SKA Critical Design Challenges • Wide bandwidth • antenna element type; use of true time delay phasing • Sensitivity • how to maintain effective area of antennas with frequency variation • Cost • need highly-integrated, easily manufactured systems • Interference mitigation • telescope site, adaptive RF, photonic and digital techniques • Calibration • 106 dynamic range; good polarization purity; both in presence of adaptive beaming! • Upgrade path • expensive infrastructure must last well; need to follow Moore’s Law (or equiv.) • Operations • robust; maintainable; advanced power generation and management

  45. SKA Critical Technologies • Antennas & feeds • wideband, multi-beaming, easily manufactured, cheap • specific CSIRO challenge to make a cheap Luneburg Lens • RF front-ends • low-noise, ambient temperature, very highly integrated • Signal transmission and distribution • wideband analog or digital station links • need cost breakthrough in opto-electronic modulators • probably incorporate photonic signal processing in analog stages • Digital signal processing • for correlators, interference mitigation • Software • the SKA will be largely a “software radio” telescope

  46. SKA - Current Australian Innovation • Antennas and arrays (e.g. Luneburg Lens, feed arrays) • Highly-integrated (GaAs or InP MMIC) receivers • Radio-frequency interference mitigation • Adaptive (“smart”) antennas • Robust receivers • Software radio • Photonics • Fibre communications (GHz analog and digital) • SKA connectivity and signal delay (wavelength division multiplexing) • Active and passive fibre signal processing (e.g. bandstop filters) • Ultra-wideband A-D Converters (15 GHz) • Advanced synthesis imaging techniques

  47. SKA - Benefits to Australia • CIE report for DISR (**DISR disclaimer) • distinguishes between participating and participating and hosting • examines quantified and unquantified benefits and costs • Quantified costs and benefits (QC&B) • R&D expenditure; operating expenditure; human capital; construction expenditure; tourism benefits • Unquantified costs and benefits (UC&B) • development contracts; new IP; scientific knowledge; construction contracts; HR & technology spinoffs; national prestige; community awareness of science and engineering • Bottom line for break-even • Participating: UC&B > $62 m(quantified cost ~ $72 m) • Participating and hosting UC&B > $44 m(quantified cost ~ $81 m)

  48. Communications CSIRO Technology:Communications Antennas Astronomy Benefit / cost ~ 2 (real estimate)

  49. Achieving the Vision - International Collaboration • To build facilities which no single nation can afford • Broaden knowledge base and provide cross fertilisation • Joint URSI - IAU working group • Endorsed by the OECD Megascience forum • International MOU for technology study program • Netherlands - Australia • China - India • Canada - U.S. • UK

More Related