1 / 16

Economic Integration Among The Asia-pacific Economic Cooperation Countries

Economic Integration Among The Asia-pacific Economic Cooperation Countries. By: Alan Meyer. Introduction. APEC – Trade union formed by fourteen countries in 1989. Three Regions. America – United States, Canada, and Mexico

matteo
Télécharger la présentation

Economic Integration Among The Asia-pacific Economic Cooperation Countries

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Economic Integration Among The Asia-pacific Economic Cooperation Countries By: Alan Meyer

  2. Introduction • APEC – Trade union formed by fourteen countries in 1989

  3. Three Regions • America – United States, Canada, and Mexico • Asia- Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, and the Philippines • Pacific – Australia and New Zealand

  4. APEC • Promotes open regionalism rather than preferential trade approach to both member and non-member nations • Agreed to form free trade area for developed nations by 2010 and developing nations by 2020

  5. Free Trade Area • Trade Liberalization, economic, and technical cooperation: involves tariff and non-tariff reductions such as custom procedures, rules of origin, standards and conformance, and competition policy

  6. Increasing Growth • Allowed inclusion of major nations globally • Started to form strong ties with the European Union

  7. Objectives • Test Linder hypothesis on the APEC developed and developing countries for 1985-1999. • Examine the effect of the Free Trade Area on bilateral trade flows between the member countries.

  8. Methodology • The gravity model – estimate trade flows between two countries • Income would have a positive effect on trade while geographical distance would have a negative effect. • Population and regional dummy variables

  9. Gravity Model • Estimated for the entire period(1985-1999) and three sub-periods (1985-1989, 1990-1994, and 1995-1999). • Estimated for three country groups: Low-income, High-income, Different-Income

  10. Equation • Log(Tradeij) = Bo + B1(logGDPi) + B2(logGDPj) + B3(logDist) + B4(logGDPCi – logGDPCj)2 +eij

  11. Tradeij-export values from country i to country j • GDPi & GDPj –incomes of exporting and importing countries • Distij – physical distance between importing and exporting country • (logGDPCj – logGDPCj)2 – measures the income similarity effect where GDPC=GDP per capita

  12. Linder Hypothesis • Income similarity effect would be on high income countries because they produce tradeable goods • In this study: United States, Canada, Japan, Australia, Singapore, and Hong Kong are high-income • New Zealand, Malaysia, South Korea, China, Indonesia, Mexico, the Philippines, and Thailand are low-income

  13. Results for Entire Period • Explained for 65% of the variation in trade flows • Income similiarity effect is only confirmed for the high-income countries. Negative and significant throughout regression • Low-income countries have a positive coefficient and is insignificant

  14. Results for Three Sub-Periods • High-Income countries have established close trade even before APEC was formed • Income similarity effect increased substantially with implementation of FTA in 1994 • Low-income countries did not increase trade. • High-income to Low-income trade increased slightly after 1994

  15. Results of the Equation • GDP- trade will increase directly with income but is higher for different income countries and high-income countries • Distance – negative for all three country groups, highest in low-income countries

  16. Conclusions • Income similarity effect is only consistent in high-income countries

More Related