1 / 17

2013 Texas Accountability System

2013 Texas Accountability System. Timeline:. 2013 Rating Labels:. Met Standard – met all performance index targets Met Alternative Standard – met all modified performance index targets for alternative education campuses and districts

meda
Télécharger la présentation

2013 Texas Accountability System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2013 Texas Accountability System

  2. Timeline:

  3. 2013 Rating Labels: • Met Standard – met all performance index targets • Met Alternative Standard – met all modified performance index targets for alternative education campuses and districts • Improvement Required – did not meet one or more performance index targets • 2013 Transition Year: The 2013 ratings criteria and targets will stand alone because the performance index framework cannot be fully implemented in 2013.

  4. Sample Campus Accountability Report

  5. WHO: -10 Student Groups -STAAR Reading, Math, & Writing WHAT: Credit based on growth expectations: 1 credit for Meeting Expectations 2 credits for Exceeding Expectations WHO: -All Students -All Test Versions -All Subject Areas WHAT: Credit given for students reaching Level II (satisfactory) performance. WHO: -Only the Eco. Dis. group and the two lowest performing race/ethnicity groups from last year. -All subject areas WHAT: Credit given for students reaching Level II (satisfactory) performance. WHO: -10 Student Groups WHAT: 4-year or 5-year Graduation rate (whichever is higher) AND Percentage of Recommended and Distinguished Grad Plans

  6. Performance Index Criteria • To receive a Met Standard rating, all campuses and districts must meet the following accountability targets on all indexes for which they have performance data in 2013. * Target will be set at about the fifth percentile of campus performance and will be applied to both campuses and districts.

  7. System Safeguards • Disaggregated performance rates based on the target for student achievement in Index 1 • Participation, graduation rates, and limits on use of STAAR Alternate and STAAR Modified are calculated to meet federal requirements. • Results reported for any cell that meets minimum size requirements • If a campus or district does not meet the safeguard target on any measure, this must be incorporated into the Campus and/or District Improvement Plan(s) and the Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS). • These missed measures will not automatically result in an unsatisfactory accountability rating

  8. System Safeguards Targets

  9. System Safeguards Sample Report

  10. Distinction Designations • Campuses must have “Met Standard” rating • AEA campuses not eligible • Utilization of comparison group (40) • 2013 Designations: • Top 25% Student Progress (Index #2) • Academic Achievement in Reading/ELA • Academic Achievement in Math

  11. Data Currently Available: • 2012 Indicators Report • Identifies the two race/ethnicity student groups that will be evaluated in Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps in 2013 • 2012 results that will be used for small numbers analyses in 2013 • Understand how each of the performance indexes (good practice) • Includes Graduation and Dropout Rates for Index 4 • Currently available on TEASE

  12. Have Questions? Jonathan Delgado System Support Region XIII 512.919.5131 Jonathan.Delgado@esc13.txed.net Jennifer Womack System Support Region XIII 512.919.5308 Jennifer.Womack@esc13.txed.net

More Related