1 / 20

Finding County-Based Data from Hidden Sources

Finding County-Based Data from Hidden Sources. Lisa Neidert Population Studies Center University of Michigan. Three Problems. Produce county-based data from summary data Not all counties represented Produce county-based data from microdata County identifiers are not in microdata

melba
Télécharger la présentation

Finding County-Based Data from Hidden Sources

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Finding County-Based Data from Hidden Sources Lisa Neidert Population Studies Center University of Michigan

  2. Three Problems • Produce county-based data from summary data • Not all counties represented • Produce county-based data from microdata • County identifiers are not in microdata • Produce county-based data from microdata • County identifier in data • Some county populations are too small for reliable data

  3. American Community Survey (ACS) • Replacement for the census long-form questionnaire • 3,000,000 households a year • County-level data every year Not quite

  4. ACS Products Schedule

  5. Distribution of US counties by size

  6. Statistics based on ACS 1-year data: Unit is county

  7. Statistics based on ACS 3-year data: Unit is county

  8. What are PUMAs? • Public Use Microdata areas • Combination of population geographies that sum to at least 100,000 population. • In rural areas, several counties will form a PUMA. In an urban area, a county will be subdivided into multiple PUMAs. • PUMAs do not cross state boundaries • Smallest geography available in the microdata.

  9. Statistics based on ACS 3-year data:Unit is PUMA

  10. Convert PUMA-based statistics to county-based statistics

  11. PUMA-based statistic

  12. Converted to county-based statistic

  13. Example based on microdata • Previous example used a table from summary data • Distribution of the baby boom population • Microdata allows user-generated table • Distribution of earning equality among couples

  14. Where do couples have egalitarian earnings profiles? • Micro-data step

  15. Where do couples have egalitarian earnings profiles? • Micro-data step • Produce PUMA-specific results

  16. Where do couples have egalitarian earnings profiles? • Micro-data step • Produce PUMA-specific results • Convert PUMA-based results to county-based using cross-walk

  17. What about microdata with county identifiers? • Identifiers on Natality Detail files • 1968-1988 | all counties identified • 1989-2005 | only counties > 100,000 • 2006+ | no state or county identifiers • Distribution of births by county (1988) • <100 | 512 counties • <500 | 1,998 counties • <1000 | 2,498 counties • Some extreme cases • Loving county, TX 2 births • Hinsdale county, CO 3 births • Petroleum county, MT 3 births

  18. Solution • Cumulate small population counties by PUMA • Calculate Fertility measures • Total Fertility Rate • Timing of fertility events • Non-marital childbearing • Use cross-walk to assign PUMA characteristic to counties

  19. Finished Product

  20. Future Directions • Cautionary • Pseudo-county data • Small population-based statistics • County population may be incorrect weight • Web-based tool (PUMA to County) • Input PUMA-based table • Output County-based table • GIS ready • Include indicator for multi-county PUMAs

More Related