1 / 46

Introduction and Motivation f or the dissertation

Introduction and Motivation f or the dissertation Essays on Changing Volatility in Thinly Traded Equity Markets by Per Bjarte Solibakke. Overview of the Dissertation’s chapters. Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 Unifying Theme and Core Hypotheses Chapter 3 Methodologies

melina
Télécharger la présentation

Introduction and Motivation f or the dissertation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Introduction and Motivation for the dissertation Essays on Changing Volatility in Thinly Traded Equity Markets by Per Bjarte Solibakke

  2. Overview of the Dissertation’s chapters Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 Unifying Theme and Core Hypotheses Chapter 3 Methodologies Chapter 4 Stylised facts on Liquidity at Oslo Stock Exchange Chapter 5 Stock return volatility in thinly traded Markets. An Empirical analysis of trading and non-trading processes for individual stocks in the Norwegian thinly traded equity market Chapter 6 Efficiently ARMA-GARCH Estimated Trading Volume Characteristics in Thinly Traded Market Chapter 7 Non-linear Dependence and Conditional Heteroscedasticity in Stock Returns. Evidence from the Norwegian Thinly Traded Equity Market Chapter 8 Testing the Univariate Conditional CAPM in Thinly Traded Markets Chapter 9 Testing the Bivariate Conditional CAPM in Thinly Traded Markets Chapter 10 Event-induced Volatility In Thinly Traded Markets Chapter 11 Calculating Abnormal Returns in Event Studies: Controlling for Non-synchronous Trading and Volatility Clustering in Thinly Traded Markets

  3. Introduction and Motivation The essays investigates Mean and Volatility characteristics investigating and modelling non-synchronous trading effects in univariate and bivariate return series. In formal mean and volatility model specifications, the objective is to obtain a zero mean and identical and independently distributed model residuals, implying strict white noise.

  4. Introduction and Motivation Introduction and Motivation Hence, the dissertations main objective: Bring new insight into asset pricing processes and market dynamics with a particular emphasize to model applicationsin many relatively thinly traded equity markets globally.

  5. Introduction and Motivation Introduction and Motivation • Key insight suggests that non-synchronous trading effects may have implications for: • Random Walk tests for for example mean and variance ratios • Option pricing Models need revising due to changing/stochastic volatility • The mixture of distributions hypothesis • Non-linearity in asset return series rejecting the martingale and the independence hypotheses

  6. Market Microstructure Non-Synchronous Trading Effects The non-synchronous trading or non-trading effect arises when time series are taken to be recorded at time intervals of one length when in fact they are recorded at time intervals of other, possibly irregular, lengths.

  7. Market Microstructure Non-Synchronous Trading Effects (cont.) For example, closing prices may be recorded for asset A (continuously traded) and B (thinly traded) applying the following typology: Day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A: B: Closing Prices Closing Prices = Closing Time for the Exchange = Ticker for a Trade

  8. Non-Synchronous Trading effects (cont.) • The lagged response in B induces spurious cross-autocorrelation between stock A and B • Spurious own-autocorrelation in daily returns for non-traded assets (B) may occur. • Event studies may be hurt by non-synchronous trading effects due to announcements and changing information flows • Obvious implications for tests of predictability, non-linearity in asset returns and quantifying the trade-offs between risk and expected returns (beta and CAPM).

  9. Non-Synchronous Trading Effects (cont.) Perhaps the most natural way to view observed returns: where is the observed return, is the virtual return and is the probability of non-trading. From here it is apparent that non-trading can induce spurious serial correlation in observed returns because each contains within it the sum of past k consecutive virtual returns for every k with some positive probability

  10. Non-Synchronous Trading Effects (cont.) The first and second moments for becomes: where and .

  11. NST Effects in Mean and Volatility • Non-synchronous trading (NST) should not affect the mean • NST increases the variance for series with nonzero means • NST induces geometrically declining negative serial correlation in returns with nonzero means • NST induces geometrically declining positive serial correlation in portfolio returns that are well diversified and have common non-trading probability, yielding an AR(1) for the observed returns process.

  12. Non-Synchronous Trading Effects • NST induces geometrically declining cross-auto-correlation between returns of asset i and j. Asymmetric due to different non-trading probabilities.

  13. Stylised Facts on Liquidity for Oslo Stock Exchange (OSE) The Norwegian Equity Market quotes about 150 assets. Below we show some characteristics for continuously traded as well as thinly traded asset, portfolio and index series from 1983 to 1995. ARCH (6) : A test for conditional heteroscedasticity in returns. RESET (12,6) : A sensitivity test for mainly linearity in the mean equation. BDS (m=2,e=1): A test statistic for general non-linearity in a time series.

  14. Stylised Facts on Liquidity for Oslo Stock Exchange (OSE)

  15. Summaries for OSE • Thin trading in some assets showing increased non-normality, serial correlation and non-linearity. • Leads and lags for international indices and for daily, weekly and monthly asset return intervals. • Anomalies are found. Coefficient changes across trading volume suggesting leads and lags in time series. • Stationary series seem plausible. • Volatility seems to change and seems higher for thinly traded assets relative to continuously traded series. • Crash (Oct. 1987) seems to be more serious for continuously traded series relative to thinly traded series.

  16. Random walks and the weak form of the EMH RW is a stochastic process where the changes of levels are given by the addition of a random variable , e, which exhibits a zero mean and a constant volatility, and where there is zero correlation between observations. Formally It is the e that has zero mean and a constant variance (s2). Yt has an expectation E(Yt)=mand a variance of ts2. RWs exhibit the Markov property and the martingale property.

  17. Stationary Time-Series A time series is said to be stationary if it has a constant mean, a constant variance and a covariance which depends only on the time between lagged observations. Clearly the index are not stationary but the index returns data may be stationary.

  18. Reasons forPotential Mean and Volatility Changes • 1. Crisis – Great Depressions, October 1987 Crash, September 11 …. • 2. Financial Leverage • Macroeconomic Variables: e.g. interest rate changes • Changes in Information Flow • Changes in trading Volume, Events, Stock Exchange Cross listings, popularity and index inclusions • Globalisation and deregulations (lower segmentations)

  19. Now assuming Stationary series, the empirical observations in the Norwegian indices show: • Return Serial correlation •  Suggesting a need for conditional mean modelling (lags) • 2. Squared Return Serial correlation

  20. Time-series Analysis: Univariate stochastic models of time-series processes Conditional Mean models suggest a return process made of past components of the time-series itself. Ex. ARIMA(2,0,2): Ex. Vector ARIMA(1,0,1) (in matrix form): An ARIMA(p,q) series {Yt} is linear if  The residual must have a mean of zero and have IID

  21. Time-series Analysis: Lag-structure Specification for conditional Mean The LAG structure and the values for p and q is based on the Bayes Information Criterion (BIC) (Schwarz, 1978). The criterion for ARMA(p,q) is specified for returns as:  Giving us optimal ARMA lag specifications!

  22. Time-series Analysis: Why non-linear models are necessary for price changes Linear AR() lag models have constant conditional variances:whatever the information about the observed returns:

  23. Time-series Analysis: Why non-linear models are necessary for price changes

  24. Time-series Analysis: Why non-linear models are necessary for price changes Squared Returns show far more dependence than ordinary returns. Plausible models for the return process must have for several small lags . This constraint can be used to prove that the return process is not linear. Non-linearity is very closely associated with volatility changes and conditional heteroscedasticity.

  25. Serial Correlation in Ordinary and Squared Returns: Index

  26. Non-synchronous Trading and Non-linearity in Returns

  27. Time-series Analysis: Why non-linear models are necessary for price changes Non-synchronous Trading and Non-linearity in Returns Ordinary Returns from thinly traded assets show far more dependence than continuously traded asset returns. For several small lags . Squared Returns from thinly traded assets don’t show much more dependence than continuously traded asset returns. Hence, for several small lags .

  28. Time-series Analysis: Why non-linear models are necessary for price changes Non-synchronous Trading and Non-linearity in Returns These constraints (especially the first) can be used to prove that thinly traded return series show a different non-linearity than continuously traded asset series.  Non-linearity is associated with volatility changes and non-synchronous trading effects.

  29. Correlation in Ordinary & Squared Returns: Thin Trading Series

  30. Correlation in Ordinary & Squared Returns: Continuous Trading

  31. The spectral densities for NST and Serial Correlation Note, spectral densities can be used to show exactly the same results. For example for thinly and continuously traded series and value-weighted index (totx): • Most of its variation among lower Fourier frequencies • Decreasing for higher Fourier Frequencies • Shorter term return Dependencies • Its variation varies among all the Fourier frequencies • No interesting shape • No obvious dependencies • Most of its variation among higher Fourier frequencies • Increasing for higher Fourier Frequencies • Longer-Term return dependencies

  32. The spectral densities for NST and Serial Correlation Squared Returns for thinly and continuously traded and value-weighted index (totx): • Its variation varies among all the Fourier frequencies • No interesting shape • No obvious dependencies • Most of its variation among lower Fourier frequencies • Slow Decrease for higher Fourier Frequencies • Shorter term squared-return dependencies • Most of its variation among lower Fourier frequencies • Decreasing for higher Fourier Frequencies • Shorter termsquared-returndependencies

  33. Serial Correlation in Ordinary and Squared Returns: Summary

  34. Serial Correlation in Ordinary and Squared Returns: Summary Q(1) Q(10) Q(20) Q(40)

  35. Serial Correlation in Ordinary and Squared Returns: Summary Indicate a stronger effect (Q) in the mean than in the volatility for thinly traded series. Should be visible in the RESET test statistic (Ramsey, 1969) and the BDS test statistic (Brock et al., 1988,1991).

  36. Test statistics for the empirical observations: Box-Ljung: Q/Q2: Ljung and Box (1978) autocorrelation test for adjusted raw returns and squared returns. ARCH (6) : ARCH (6) is a test for conditional heteroscedasticity in returns. Low {.} indicates significant values. We employ the OLS-regression y2 =a0 + a1*y2t-1+…+a6*y2t-6. T*R2 is c2 distributed with 6 degrees of freedom. T is the number of observations, y is returns and R2 is the explained over total variation. a0, a1 … a6 are parameters. RESET (12,6) : A sensitivity test for mainly linearity in the mean equation. 12 is number of lags and 6 is the number of moments that is chosen in our implementation of the test statistic.T*R2 is c2 distributed with 12 degrees of freedom. Finally, BDS (m=2,e=1): A test statistic for general non-linearity in a time series. The test statistic BDS =T1/2*[Cm(s*e)- C1(s*e)m], where C is based on the correlation-integral, m is the dimension and e is the number of standard deviations. Under the null hypothesis of identically and independently distributed (i.i.d.) series, the BDS-test statistic is asymptotic normally distributed with a zero mean and with a known but complicated variance.

  37. Time-series Analysis: Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (G)ARCH model specifications have been developed to take account of the non-stationary of the variance. Moreover, financial markets show a need for improved forecasts of the volatility of financial time series, the advent of financial options and the generally greater volatility of financial markets in the last 20 or so years. Techniques developed in the 1980s by Engle (1982), Bollerslev (1986)and Nelson (1991) have given us the econometric tools for making predictions of future time-varying volatility.

  38. Time-series Analysis: Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity The unconditional variance of a random variable is given as We are interested in the conditional mean, mt, and the conditional variance h2t. The conditional mean is the expected value of a random variable when the expectation is influenced (conditional) by knowledge of other random variables. mtis the expected value of yt, conditioned on the set of information, F, available in the previous time period. The information set F could contain any sources of information.

  39. Time-series Analysis: Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity Similarly, the conditional variance is the variance of a random variable conditioned by knowledge of other random variables. The difference between yt and the mean is et. We can derive the conditional variance, h2t, as a function of past squared residuals of the conditional mean equation (one one lag): and generalised ARCH becomes (only one lag):

  40. Time-series Analysis: Lag-structure Specification for conditional Volatility The criterion for GARCH(m,n) is specified for the squared residuals (e2) from the ARMA(p,q) residuals determined above as: The criterion reward good fits as represented by small(ln s2)and uses the term(m+n)T-1 lnTto penalise good fits that is got by means of excessively rich parameterisations.  Optimal GARCH lag specification!

  41. Consequences of non-linearity in returns • Random Walk tests require changes •  Mean and Variance Ratios for individual assets 2. Option Valuation deserves more consideration  Changing Volatility Models  Stochastic Volatility Models • The distribution of returns is a mixture distribution •  Non-Normal conditional return distributions

  42. Dissertation paper: A Random Walk/Brownian Motion application. Chapter 5. Stock return Volatility in thinly Traded Markets. An Empirical analysis of trading and non-trading processes for individual stocks in the Norwegian thinly traded market (AFE, 2000, 10, pp.299-310)

  43. 2. Option Valuation deserves more consideration • Models of Changing Volatility across NST and CT series •  Remedy non-linearity found in raw and adjusted asset, portfolio and Index return series.

  44. Dissertation papers for ARMA-GARCH lag specifications: Univariate Specifications Chapter 6. Efficiently Estimated ARMA-GARCH Trading Volume Characteristics in Thinly Traded Equity Markets (AFE, 2001, 11, pp.539-556) Chapter 7. Non-linear Dependence and Conditional Heteroscedasticity. Evidence from the Norwegian Thinly Traded Equity Market (EJF, 2001, pp. 1 –30) Chapter 8. Testing the Univariate conditional CAPM in thinly Traded Markets (AFE, 2001, 11, in press) Multivariate/Bivariate Specifications Chapter 9. Testing the Bivariate conditional CAPM in thinly Traded Markets (Forskpub Molde 2001) Chapter 10. Event Induced Volatility (Forskpub, Molde 2001) Chapter 11. Calculating Abnormal Returns In Event studies: Controlling for Non- Synchronous Trading and Volatility Clustering in Thinly Traded Markets (Managerial Finance, 2002, in press)

  45. 2. Option Valuation deserves more consideration  Models of Stochastic Volatility  Remedy non-linearity found in raw and adjusted asset, portfolio and Index return series.

  46. Newly Published Papers for SNP/EMM specifications: A Stochastic Volatility with Diagnostics for Thinly Traded Equity Markets (JMFM, 2001, 11, pp.539-556)

More Related