1 / 27

The groundwater source as a hygienic barrier

The groundwater source as a hygienic barrier. Dr. Sylvi Gaut, NGU. GroPro, September 2008. Present a method to evaluate to what extent drinking water sources in Norway can act as a hygienic barrier towards pathogenic microorganisms Focus on crystalline bedrock aquifers. www.zoologi.no.

melina
Télécharger la présentation

The groundwater source as a hygienic barrier

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The groundwater source as a hygienic barrier Dr. Sylvi Gaut, NGU GroPro, September 2008

  2. Present a method to evaluate to what extent drinking water sources in Norway can act as a hygienic barrier towards pathogenic microorganisms Focus on crystalline bedrock aquifers

  3. www.zoologi.no Norwegian Drinking Water Regulations • Two separate hygienic barriers • the barrier shall remove, inactivate or kill the organisms • natural or manmade • normally one hygienic barrier is established in the drinking water source B. O. Hilmo, Asplan Viak Contaminant Ill: Based on figure from J. Czichos: "What's so funny about microbiology"

  4. Focus on preventing contamination • Low population density • Access to large areas with no domestic animals, farmland or industry • choose drinking water sources with good natural water quality

  5. The drinking water source as a hygienic barrier Questions? • to what extent is the drinking water source a hygienic barrier towards pathogenic microorganisms • which conditions must be met in order to have such a barrier Picture: Steinar Grønnesby, Trondheim kommune

  6. The drinking water source as a hygienic barrier • Project initiated by Norwegian Water to answer these questions • surface water as the main drinking water source • groundwater sources investigated by NGU • Method based on: • the Scottish method for risk assessment of Cryptosporidium • a model for evaluating the barrier efficiency required through water treatment for Norwegian waterworks [The drinking water source as a hygienic barrier]

  7. Criteria to evaluate the drinking water source as a hygienic barrier • Historical water quality (microbiological) • The source (well construction, location and recharge area) • Monitoring of the raw-water quality and contingency plans • The size of the waterwork

  8. The method • Criteria 1-3 are divided into subgroups • Scoring system is used to evaluate the barrier effect for each subgroup • 0 is no barrier • 10 is a full barrier

  9. Suggested score for factors related to the subgroup Well design Total score = (criterion 2.1 + criterion 2.2 + criterion 2.3)/3

  10. Criterion 1 - Historical water quality • Describes the microbiological quality through time • representative for the raw-water throughout the year • sample interval minimum once a month for 2 years • sampling directly from (or close to) production well • sample from each production well • Divided into two groups • E. coli • parasites (Cryptosporidium and Giardia) • Challange • E. coli is analysed, parasites are not

  11. Criterion 2 The groundwater source • What are the important factors influencing the microbiological water quality? • crystalline bedrock aquifers • Four groups • the superficial deposits • land use • well design • wellhead completion Picture: B. Frengstad, NGU

  12. Thickness of the superficial deposits • Should be ≥ 2.5 m thick • If not, water treatment or disinfection is necessary a) b)

  13. The groundwater source

  14. The groundwater source

  15. Well design – focused on well casing

  16. Leakage between well casing and bedrock Raising main Water Bottom of well casing

  17. Well design – focused on well casing

  18. Well design – focused on well casing

  19. The groundwater source

  20. Wellhead completion

  21. Criterion 3: Monitoring of the raw-water quality and contingency plans • Regular sampling intervals • once a month • Variations in certain physio-chemical parameters can indicate contamination • colour, turbidity and iron • for single wells • changes in concentrations both up and down

  22. Criterion 3: Monitoring of the raw-water and contingency plans

  23. Criterion 4: Size of the waterwork • Implemented as a risk parameter • Criterion 4 = 1/log10(number of persons supplied) • Illustrate that contamination is more serious for a large waterwork than for a small

  24. Estimation of total barrier effect • Total barrier effect = (C1*C2*C3*C4)/100 • Values ≥ 1: • the groundwater source can act as a hygienic barrier Lillehammer waterwork. A. Gaut, Sweco

  25. Estimation of total barrier effect • Values < 1: • actions must be taken to improve the protection of the groundwater source or • a barrier must be added through water treatment or disinfection • If improvements are effectuated, microbiological water quality must be monitored for a new two year period

  26. Conclusions • Four criteria is suggested to evaluate to what extent a groundwater source is sufficiently protected and thereby can act a hygienic barrier. • Historical water quality • The groundwater source • Monitoring and contingency plans • The size of the waterwork • The method is still under development. Subgroups and scores suggested for each criterion are preliminary.

  27. Thank you!

More Related