1 / 4

Understanding Supreme Court Workflow: From Petitions for Certiorari to Oral Arguments

This overview explores the Supreme Court's workflow, including the petition process for certiorari, the significance of the Rule of Four, and how cases progress through the Court. We discuss the grant and docketing of certiorari, the submission of briefs, and key steps such as oral arguments and opinion assignments. Additionally, we address critical questions regarding jurisdiction, original versus appellate jurisdiction, and the implications of the Judiciary Act of 1789 and Article III of the Constitution. The discussion reflects on pivotal cases like Marbury v. Madison and critiques by legal scholars.

melosa
Télécharger la présentation

Understanding Supreme Court Workflow: From Petitions for Certiorari to Oral Arguments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Supreme Court Workflow 1 Petitions for Certiorari Discuss List Dismissed Rule of Four Certiorari Granted – Placed on Docket Briefs Submitted

  2. Supreme Court Workflow 2 Oral Argument Conference/ Opinion Assigned Majority Opinion Circulated Dissents/Concurrences Circulated Opinion Released

  3. Key Terms to Review • Original Jurisdiction • Appellate Jurisdiction • Writ of Mandamus • Judiciary Act of 1789, Section 13 • Art. III, sec. 2 of the Constitution

  4. Questions for Marbury Jurisdiction is the power of a court to hear a case, shouldn’t this have been decided first? Did Congress give the Supreme Court original jurisdiction in Sec. 13 of the Judiciary Act? Does the Constitution give Congress the power to regulate the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction? Who wins in this case? Consider Gibson’s critique of MarburyinEakin. Who has the better argument, Marshall or Gibson?

More Related