1 / 18

BARCS Study: A Brief Overview

BARCS Study: A Brief Overview. Principal Investigator : Dr. Godfrey Pearlson CCSU Investigators: Dr. Carol Shaw Austad Dr. Carolyn Fallahi Dr. Rebecca Wood Trinity Investigator: Dr. Sarah Raskin

melvin-hansen
Télécharger la présentation

BARCS Study: A Brief Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BARCS Study: A Brief Overview Principal Investigator : Dr. Godfrey Pearlson CCSU Investigators: Dr. Carol Shaw Austad Dr. Carolyn Fallahi Dr. Rebecca Wood Trinity Investigator: Dr. Sarah Raskin Funded by National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) grant RO1 AA016599

  2. The BARCS Mascot

  3. Study Objectives • Identify neurological, cognitive, emotional, and academic developmental changes during adolescence and early adulthood • Investigate changes in typical neuropsychological development associated with alcohol use • Identify different drinking patterns among college-age drinkers and the various outcomes associated with these patterns • Generate normative developmental data, based on light drinkers and nondrinkers, and document trends over time

  4. Participants • 2000 college freshmen (ages 18-25) • Participants were currently attending Central Connecticut State University or Trinity College (the tables that follow represent CCSU only) • Participants were recruited from introductory psychology classes, and from the general student population at both universities

  5. Participant Demographics (CCSU):Sex and Age

  6. Participant Demographics (CCSU):Race and Ethnicity

  7. Procedure:CCSU and Trinity • Participants attended an initial set of two appointments as freshmen • Baseline measures of health, alcohol and drug use, and cognitive functioning • After these appointments, participants recorded their alcohol and substance use, as well as any psychological and social changes using monthly online surveys • After two years, participants completed a set of two follow-up appointments, nearly identical to the first

  8. Procedure:Olin Neuropsychiatric Research Center (ONRC) • A portion of participants from CCSU and Trinity were invited to ONRC, located in the Institute of Living at Hartford Hospital, for further testing • Procedure: • 30-minute electroencephalography (EEG) • 90-minute MRI • Computerized neurocognitive tests • Detailed interview assessing alcohol use • Substance use history

  9. Brain Imaging Techniques For BARCS: fMRI and sMRI • Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (sMRI) • Powerful magnetic field is used to produce an image of the internal structure of the body • A structural MRI provides a clear and detailed image of brain tissue • BARCS will use this technique to see structural changes in the brains of participants through the duration of the study • Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) • Visualizes brain activity by measuring changes in blood flow, using blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) contrast • Participants perform various tasks while in the scanner • This allows us to assess the extent to which different areas of the brain are activated during these tasks

  10. Brain Imaging Techniques for BARCS:EEG • Electroencephalography (EEG) measures electrical activity in the brain via electrodes placed on the scalp • When neurons fire, they change their electrical charge, thus cell firing can be detected by these electrodes • There are 6 EEG bands • Each band refers to a different frequency range recorded by the electrodes, and corresponds to different cognitive activities and arousal levels • These bands allow us to make inferences about participants’ cognitive activity at different points in time, throughout various tasks • EEG is useful when looking to detect very rapid changes (recorded in milliseconds) in cell firing EEG Cap

  11. Concepts and Measures • Impulsivity • Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11) • Zuckerman Sensation Seeking Scale (SSS) • Neurocognitive Functioning • One-Back (Attention) • Groton Maze Task (Spatial Problem Solving, Memory) • Digit-Symbol Task (Processing Speed) • BART (Inhibition) • Behavioral Inhibition System and Behavioral Activation System Scale (BIS/BAS)

  12. Concepts and Measures, cont. • Psychiatric Assessment • Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) • Environmental Factors • Life Events Scale for Students (LESS) • Perceived Social Support Scale (PSS) • Alcohol and Substance Use Patterns • Modified Timeline Followback (TLFB) • Self Rating Effects of Alcohol (SRE) • Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID)- Alcohol Use Disorder and Substance Use Disorder Subscales • Drinking Motives Questionnaire (Modified) • Fagerstrom (Nicotine Dependence)

  13. Preliminary Results:Drinking/Substance Use on Campus • Results for participant reported alcohol use: • Average number of drinks per week: 5.56 • “In the past 30 days on those occasions when you drank alcohol, how many drinks did you usually have?”: 3.33 • “On how many days did you have a drink of alcohol in the past 30 days?”: 3.87 • Results: Days of marijuana use in the past 30 days: • Never: 69% • 1-5 days: 16.4% • 6-19 days: 7.1% • 20-30 days: 7.6% • In a sample of CCSU participants (N=430): • 90 (20.9%) met criteria for Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) • 340 (79.1%) did not meet criteria for AUD

  14. Preliminary Results:Correlates of Alcohol Use • Dysfunctional Drinkers: • Increased scores of impulsivity, sensation seeking, disinhibition, and fun seeking • Social Drinkers: • Increased motor impulsiveness (acting on the spur of the moment) and fun seeking, compared to non-drinkers • Non-Drinkers (Teetotalers): • Decreased levels of perceived social support from friends • Fewer life event stressors • Drinking and GPA • Negative correlation between binge drinking and GPA • This trend is strongest in the first year of college, then begins to diminish

  15. Preliminary Results:Family History of Alcoholism • Those with a family history of alcoholism (FH+) have significantly different motives for drinking than FH- • Social, Coping, and Enhancement drinking motives were reported at a higher rate for FH+ • FH+ also: • Reported more days of drinking per month • Reported more days of binge drinking per month • Higher rates of AUD and SUD • Increased scores of sensation seeking, cognitive instability, and antisocial personality disorder

  16. Comparison: CORE Data and BARCS Data • CORE Institute is a national database that collects information about student alcohol and drug use • The following CORE data is taken from a sample of 890 CCSU freshmen from 2010

  17. CCSU’s Involvement • Over 1500 CCSU students have participated in BARCS, giving them an opportunity to contribute to the scientific literature, and to learn about the research process • CCSU’s involvement in a nationally-funded research project increases the university’s academic and research reputation, and gains recognition for the school • The study also investigates alcohol use patterns among many CCSU students, and therefore allows us to compare our findings to data from the nation as a whole

  18. Importance of the Study • The BARCS study is one of the few projects that assess alcohol use over a span of several years and include a large group of participants • These factors make the study more sensitive to subtle, long-term changes due to alcohol use than many others • Previous research focuses on total volume of alcohol consumed, while the BARCS study investigates the role of drinking patterns • Individuals that consume a similar amount of alcohol over time- but differ in their drinking patterns- may have distinct changes in behavioral and neurological development • i.e. Compare an individual who drinks 1 drink per night, seven nights per week and an individual who drinks 7 drinks in one night, once per week

More Related