1 / 12

Cultural Studies -- Pastiche & Universal Abandon?

Cultural Studies -- Pastiche & Universal Abandon? . Some Central Issues from a Perspective of Literary Studies Based on Jonathan Culler’s Literary Theory. From FLW to Cultural Studies. FLW – Historicizes different definitions of morality, authority, freedom and love

melvina
Télécharger la présentation

Cultural Studies -- Pastiche & Universal Abandon?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Cultural Studies -- Pastiche & Universal Abandon? Some Central Issues from a Perspective of Literary Studies Based on Jonathan Culler’s Literary Theory

  2. From FLW to Cultural Studies • FLW – Historicizes different definitions of morality, authority, freedom and love • FLW – intertextual, the use of different discourses and languages • The approaches of Cultural Studies – interdisciplinary and networking

  3. Outline • Transition from FLW to Cultural Studies • Why in our class? • Literature vs. Culture • History of Cultural Studies in brief. • Central Concerns: • Culture and People; • Definition of culture; • The Disciplinary Boundaries and Focuses of Literary Studies; • Modes of Analysis

  4. Why in our class? • “Theories” – not just of literature, but of ‘signifying practices,’ psyche and society.(43) • Can serve as an example of how theories are connected to each other. (e.g. marxism + psychoanalysis + structuralism) • Can help connect what we have learned to our own society.

  5. Literature and Culture • Culture as “is to know the best that has been said and thought in the world.” • Culture as the whole way of life – including literature as well as popular culture • The relations between cultural studies and literary studies (44)

  6. Cultural Studies: Articulation of Theories • Subjectivity and power relations (Race, gender, class relations) in culture (cultural hegemony).  the circuit of culture Structuralism & semiotics Political agenda of Marxism + Postcolonialism + feminism

  7. Cultural Studies: History of Articulation (pp. 44-) • 50'ssocialist humanism; (or Marxism) -- Hoggart, Williams, Thompson; New Left; • 60's -- culturalist • 70‘s -- Structuralist marxism; Semiotics; -- e.g. Althusser; Roland Barthes; • mid-70’s – Gramsci & Foucault; -- Derrida +Discourse theories of Foucault;  -- Althusser + Lacan • mid- 80's -- postmodern debate • 90‘s – regional Cultural Studies (e.g. that in Taiwan, or inter-Asia Cultural Studies)

  8. Different Theoretical Schools • Roland Barthes – ‘connotation’ of culture in his studies of different languages (e.g. wrestling p. 45; more next time.) • central debate 1: culture and people; popular culture vs. mass culture – of the people or imposed on the people (p. 45-) ; -- agency vs. mass; hegemony vs.ideological interpellation;  strategies of identification, self-location, resistance, etc. -- e.g. Are cf’s a kind of art? How do we respond to the interpellation of cf’s?

  9. Cultural Studies: Main Concerns (2) • Points of contention: • Definitions of culture (high art vs. popular culture) & popular culture (mass culture or people’s culture); culture as a process and a product. • Disciplinary boundaries (what should a lit. major study?); • Relation between lit. studies, sociology and cultural studies (pp. 47) –boundaries blurred but not necessarily erased, each implying different criteria. • Contexts re-defined and/or expanded (48)

  10. Cultural Studies: Main Concerns (3) • Canon –e.g. the argument for “pure” or authentic literature; over principles of selection (pp. 48-50). •  Where does literary canon matter? In support of some power positions (of men, of some institutes in defining their identities) (response 2) • The choice of context (or object of representation) determines the principles of selection. Even aesthetic values are determined by context. (responses 1 & 3) • Awareness of culture/knowledge as produced in context but not absolute truth • cognitive flexibility

  11. Cultural Studies: Main Concerns (4) • 3. Modes of analysis • close reading vs. context analysis (including survey or quantity studies); appreciative interpretation vs. symptomatic reading;  not always in opposition • the lure of totality (e.g. gained through survey and statistics in studies of audience response)  combined with other methods; • CS “Is supposed” to make a difference in society.  Cultural Studies with Glo-cal concerns.

  12. Next Time • Chap 11 (chinese); The English version British cultural studies / an introduction Graeme. Turner306.40941 T853 • Moulin Rouge

More Related