360 likes | 562 Vues
Reducing Absence: a Viewpoint. Optimum performance requires people to be present at their place of work Absence has always been a concern of employers Methods for reducing absence have frequently focused on disciplinary or punitive measures
E N D
Reducing Absence: a Viewpoint • Optimum performance requires people to be present at their place of work • Absence has always been a concern of employers • Methods for reducing absence have frequently focused on disciplinary or punitive measures • Companies are not looking at promoting attendance and rehabilitating employees
Absence Trends (1 of 2) CIPD 2003 – 9 days absence per employee per year This is a reduction on previous year CBI 2003 – 6.8 days lost per person per year
Absence Trends (2 of 2) Absence is higher in larger organisations Public sector absence is usually higher than that in private sector Some industrial sectors report higher absence than others
Cost of Absence CIPD Survey – organisations felt absence to be a considerable cost but less than half measured the cost Measurement of cost difficult – needs to include direct and indirect costs Employment Studies Inst – suggest that there is virtually no robust data on direct and indirect costs of absence
Long Term Sickness Costs Bevan reports that long-term sickness costs account for between 30 and 70% of absence costs Companies are not that equipped to measure this accurately
Growing Importance of Absence Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) changes in 1994 – burden passed to employer Disability Discrimination Act 1995 – employers need to provide reasonable adjustments to enable disabled (including long-term sick) to continue in employment
Causes of Absence • Minor illnesses • Back pain for manual workers • Stress for non-manual workers
Model of Attendance Figure 15.1 The Rhodes and Steers process model of attendance (Source: S. Rhodes and R. Steers (1990) Managing Employee Absenteeism, Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley.)
Managing for Attendance • Policies for managing absence • Need for consistency in the construction and implementation of absence management policies • Line Managers must feel some ownership of policy and procedures
Attendance Management Policies • Causes of absence • Mix of measures to reduce risk of ill health • Measures intended to reduce spells of absence • Mix of methods to discourage absence and positively encourage attendance • How each will operate for long-term and short-term absences
The ALIEDIM Process • Assess the absence problem • Locate the absence problem • Identify and prioritise absence causes • Evaluate the current absence control methods • Design the absence control programme • Implement the absence control programme • Monitor the effectiveness of the absence control programme (Huczynski & Fitzpatrick, 1989)
Scoring Absence Figure 15.2 The Bradford factor formula for scoring absence (Note: The score is usually calculated over a year.)
Absence Procedures (1 of 3) • Maintaining accurate records • Implementing absence review and trigger points • Setting absence targets and benchmarks • Providing training and support to line managers
Absence Procedures (2 of 3) • Clearly communicated absence notification procedures • Analysis of absence data • Ongoing contact during absence • Return to work interviews
Absence Procedures (3 of 3) • Formal absence reviews • Disciplinary procedures • Communicating absence levels and performance assessments • Attendance bonus and reward schemes • Changes to work and work organisation • Occupational health and support
Absence Targets One approach is to tie absence targets to managers performance review and performance payments Targets need to be carefully used so as not to give the impression that absence is not allowed
Ongoing Contact During Absence • Reduces length of absence • Demonstrates to employee organisational interest • Maintain employee motivation • Can keep them up to date
Return to Work Interviews • Welcome the employee back • Update them on recent events • Check employee well enough to resume duties • Assess any further organisational support required • Reinforce attendance requirements • Review employee’s absence record
Use of Disciplinary Procedures (1 of 2) • There are occasions when someone is too ill to work and has to be dismissed • Dismissing someone who is unable to work because of ill health is potentially fair • A warning must be given that dismissal may occur if employee does not return to work • Consultation must take place ahead of time to determine a return in foreseeable future
Use of Disciplinary Procedures (2 of 2) • Act on medical advice • Normally refrain form dismissing sick employee for at least 6 months • No dismissal should occur if employee falls under definition of ‘disabled’. Dismissal once employer is satisfied that no reasonable adjustments can be made
Persistently Short Periods of Absence • Is there a genuine underlying medical reason? • Review and where necessary instigate disciplinary action
Summary • Employee absence incurs costs and lost performance • Major cause of short-term absence is minor illnesses • Long-term absence – back pain and stress • Need to understand causes of absence to be able to remedy them • Attendance management policies can include a whole range of procedures to measure, record, minimise absences
Focus on Skills III: Performance Appraisal • Not a precise measurement • A subjective assessment is made • History of being damned for its ineffectiveness • People seek information on how they are doing • Is difficult to do and frequently done badly • When done well can be invaluable to the business
Contrasting Approaches • Motivation of management control • Motivation of self development
The Management Control Approach Is likely to engender: • Conflictual behaviour and attitudes • Negotiated modifications to schemes • Tight bureaucratic controls • Bland, safe statements in appraisal process • Little impact on actual performance • Reduced openness, trust and initiative
The Development Approach • Develops co-operative behaviour • Confronts issues, seeking resolutions • Does not work well with bureaucratic control • Produces searching analysis directly affecting performance • Requires high trust
Problems For Those Conducting Appraisals • Prejudice • Insufficient knowledge of appraisees • The halo effect • Context
Problems For Both Appraisees & Appraisers • Paperwork • Formality
Causes of Failure • Outcomes are ignored • Everyone is ‘just above average’ • Appraising the wrong features
Appraisal Interview Style • Problem solving style • Tell and sell • Tell and listen
Appraisal Interview Sequence • Preparation • Reception • Setting
Appraisal Interview Structure (1 of 2) Figure III.1 Structure for a performance appraisal interview
Appraisal Interview Structure (2 of 2) Figure III.1 Structure for a performance appraisal interview
Making Appraisal Work • Ensure all those involved are clear about what system is for • Visible ownership by senior and line management • Openness • Participation and involvement • Administered to cause few problems • Supported by follow up action
Summary (1 of 2) • Performance appraisal has a poor track record • Performance appraisal has considerable potential when done well • Several problems including prejudice, halo effect, problems of context • Three approaches to the appraisal interview
Summary (2 of 2) • Features of the appraisal interview – opening, factual review, appraisee’s views on performance, appraiser’s views, problem solving, objective setting • Follow up important • Training is essential