1 / 7

RULE OF LAW

RULE OF LAW. COURT CASES. S v Anderson 1964 (3) SA 494 (A). When will an appeal court alter a sentence? No reasonable man ought to impose such a sentence Sentence out of proportion to the gravity and magnitude of the offence Sentence induces a sense of shock or outrage

mendel
Télécharger la présentation

RULE OF LAW

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. RULE OF LAW COURT CASES

  2. S v Anderson 1964 (3) SA 494 (A) • When will an appeal court alter a sentence? • No reasonable man ought to impose such a sentence • Sentence out of proportion to the gravity and magnitude of the offence • Sentence induces a sense of shock or outrage • Sentence is grossly excessive or inadequate • Improper exercise of discretion by trail judge

  3. Interests of justice require it • Not when court would have exercised discretion differently • Only after careful consideration of all relevant circumstance • Nature of the offence committed • Person of the accused • Great difference between sentence of appeal court and sentence imposed – trail court acted unreasonably

  4. S v Zinn 1969 (2) SA 537 (A) • Duties of the Judge • Punish in spirit of equity not anger • Faults of judges • Hastiness • Striving after severity • Misplaced pity • No steps – more harshly or indulgently than is called for by the case

  5. Zinn continues • Trivial cases – more inclined to mildness • Serious cases – follow severity of laws with certain moderation of generosity • Traid • Crime • Offender • Interests of Society

  6. Zinn continues • Age • Generally not ground for leniency • No corporal punishment • Chances to reform? • Health • Medical care needed – provide in gaol

  7. S v Bridges 1997 (2) SACR 518 (C) • Traid • Crime • Offender • Interests of Society • When will an appeal court alter a sentence? • Great difference between sentence of appeal court and sentence imposed – • Disturbingly inappropriate • Differs markedly

More Related