1 / 11

Explaining Power Laws by Trade-Offs

Explaining Power Laws by Trade-Offs. Alex Fabrikant, Elias Koutsoupias, Milena Mihail, Christos Papadimitriou. Powerlaws in the Internet. [Faloutsos 3 1999]: the degrees of the Internet topology are power law distributed

mercer
Télécharger la présentation

Explaining Power Laws by Trade-Offs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Explaining Power Laws by Trade-Offs Alex Fabrikant, Elias Koutsoupias, Milena Mihail, Christos Papadimitriou

  2. Powerlaws in the Internet • [Faloutsos3 1999]: the degrees of the Internet topology are power law distributed • Both autonomous systems graph and router graph • Hop distances: ditto • Eigenvalues: ditto (!??!) • Model? DIMACS, Feb 13, 2002

  3. The world according to Zipf • Power laws, Zipf’s law, heavy tails,… • “the signature of human activity” • i-th largest is ~ i-a (cities, words: a = 1) • Equivalently: prob[X greater than x] ~ x -b • (compare with law of large numbers) DIMACS, Feb 13, 2002

  4. Models predicting power laws • Size-independent growth (“the rich get richer”) • Preferential attachment • Brownian motion in log • Exponential arrival + exponential growth • Copying (web graph) • Carlson and Doyle 1999: Highly optimized tolerance (HOT) DIMACS, Feb 13, 2002

  5. Our model: minj < i [  dij + hopj] DIMACS, Feb 13, 2002

  6. hopj • Average hop distance from other nodes • Maximum hop distance from other nodes • Distance from center (first node) NB: Resulting graph is a tree DIMACS, Feb 13, 2002

  7. Theorem: • if  < const, then graph is a star degree = n -1 • if  > n, then there is exponential concentration of degrees prob(degree > x) < exp(-ax) • otherwise, if const <  < n, heavy tail prob(degree > x) > x -a DIMACS, Feb 13, 2002

  8. Also: why are files on the Internet power-law distributed? • Suppose each data item i has “popularity” ai • Partition data items in files to minimize total cost • Cost of each file: total popularity · size + overhead C • Notice trade-off! • From [CD99] DIMACS, Feb 13, 2002

  9. Files (continued) • Suppose further that popularities of items are iid from distribution f • Result: File sizes are power law distributed “for any reasonable” distribution f (exponential, Gaussian, uniform, power law, etc.) • ([CD99] observe it for a few distributions) DIMACS, Feb 13, 2002

  10. Heuristically optimized tradeoffs • Power law distributions seem to also come from tradeoffs between objectives (asignature of human activity?) • Generalizes [CD99] (the other objective need not be reliability) • cf [Mandelbrot 1954]: Power Laws in language are due to a tradeoff between information and communication costs DIMACS, Feb 13, 2002

  11. PS: Eigenvalues of the Internet may be a corollary of the degrees phenomenon: Theorem: If a graph has largest degrees d1, d2,…, dk and o(dk ) more edges, then with high probability its largest eigenvalues are within (1+ o(1)) of d1, d2,…, dk (NB: The eigenvalue exponent observed in Faloutsos3 is about ½ of the degree exponent!) DIMACS, Feb 13, 2002

More Related