150 likes | 262 Vues
This report summarizes the findings of the point matching evaluation conducted by Motaz Semir and Howard. We analyzed five distinct data sets (A, B, C, D, E), each subjected to 20 tests to calculate the average accuracy rates. The final grade for each set was determined by the mean accuracy across all tests, with a tiebreaker based on average execution time. Detailed tables present the results from multiple experiments, highlighting key performance indicators, and recognizing the top performers: Feipeng Zhao, Bernardo F. Juncal, and An Dang.
E N D
Point Matching Evaluation Report Motaz Semir Howard
Grading Strategy • 5 data sets: A,B,C,D,E • For each data set: run 20 tests and average the acc rates • Final grade: average acc rate of 5 data sets • Tiebreaker is Average Time
Table: A Red circle: highest accuracy rate Blue circle: shortest running time when acc > 0.9
Table: A,B,C,D,E,Avg Acc Table:
Winners: Alpha: Feipeng Zhao Bernardo F. Juncal An Dang