1 / 14

Changes (?) and Trends in EU-Trade Defence System

Changes (?) and Trends in EU-Trade Defence System. 10th Anniversary of China’s Anti-Dumping practice 24-26th June, 2007 in Beijing Harald Wenig, EU Commission. What’s new in Brussels?. New trade pattern: Producer / Importer Competition aspects Environmental / Social aspects

meriel
Télécharger la présentation

Changes (?) and Trends in EU-Trade Defence System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Changes (?) and Trends in EU-Trade Defence System 10th Anniversary of China’s Anti-Dumping practice 24-26th June, 2007 in Beijing Harald Wenig, EU Commission

  2. What’s new in Brussels? New trade pattern: Producer / Importer Competition aspects Environmental / Social aspects Transparency Politisation MES China Trade Policy and Steel / Textiles Green Paper

  3. New trade patternProducer / Importer • Globalisation changed the “front lines” • What is a “producer” ? • R&D in Europe ? • Value of production ? • Investment in exporting country ? • What are the consequences ? • Importers/producers can oppose • Injury determination will be changed

  4. Competition aspects I • No international competition rules • Distortions not allowed internally - Why externally? • The sources of AD/AS • State aids is (relatively) clear but: • Dual pricing? • Input subsidies • No specificity

  5. Competition aspects II - The sources of “dumping” • Tariff/Non-tariff barriers • High custom duties • Customs procedures, certifications, standards, norms • Private “cartel agreements” • “Abuses” of a (pre-) dominant position • State interventions in economic operations

  6. Competition aspects III • Examples of state intervention: • *Un-performing loans by state banks • *Export obligations/incentives • *Import/export restrictions • *No enforcement of accounting • *Establishing « Strategic industries » • *No competition law

  7. Environmental / Social aspects • Cost/Competitive advantages of no or low standards • The classic principle: not in TDI • The « double whammy » argument • The flavour of the day? • Arguments on Public Interest Test

  8. Transparency • The big issue in EU • Access to confidential files? • TDI as more judicial procedure • *Hearing officer • *Role of lobbying • *Published deadlines • *Published minutes • More assistance to SMEs? • *Established practice for EU companies • *No discrimination for exporters?

  9. Politisation • Real problem in EU • *27 Member states • *No homogeneous industrial fabric • *Large discretion in certain areas • Not only an EU problem • *Monopolized exporting industry • *Direct links to Government • *Insufficient legal system • *Good governance: work in progress

  10. MES China • Is it political or technical? • Is there light at the end of tunnel? • MES and competitive distortions • *Free access to state budget? • *Policy considerations VS Economic rationale • Why not subsidy law? • *Is the US approach a good one? • *Input subsidies/specificity

  11. Trade Policy and Steel / Textiles • Textile quotas disappear end of 2007 • China Textiles / Steel: • Excess capacity • State support • Market economy? • Remedies: • Negotiations, export tax • Double licence system • TDI? • Market access ?

  12. Green Paper • Conflict of interests between: • producing and • trading companies • Transparency • Politisation • Link with other policies • Procedural questions

  13. Green Paper State of play and main points : • Main points raised by importers • Strengthen the Community Interest Test – give importers more weight • development policy consideration • Reduced duration of measures • Increase thresholds (e.g. standing, de-minimis) • Higher injury standards • Main points raised by producers • Environmental and social considerations in the Community Interest Test (e.g. • Community Interest Test not applied if social and/or environmental dumping • Avoid double whammy • Creation of an independent agency • More effective and rapid imposition and implementation of measures

  14. TDI – The future is bright (?) • Trade liberalisation and Safety valve • Less TDI – More protectionist pressure • Without competition law, what else? • DG Comp. Int. (??)

More Related