1 / 29

Data Dictionary Development Project

Model Impaired Driving Records Information System Promoting and Planning an Impaired Driving Records System in Your State. Data Dictionary Development Project. Background Milestones: 1997 DWI Tracking Guideline Report Demonstration Grants Federal Register Guidelines (2006)

meriel
Télécharger la présentation

Data Dictionary Development Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Model Impaired Driving Records Information SystemPromoting and Planning an Impaired Driving Records System in Your State

  2. Data Dictionary Development Project • Background Milestones: • 1997 DWI Tracking Guideline Report • Demonstration Grants • Federal Register Guidelines (2006) • SAFETEA-LU Requirements • NHTSA shall provide “…guidelines… types and formats of data…” • Data Dictionary Effort (2008-2009) 09/09/2009

  3. What is MIDRIS? Model Impaired Driving Records Information System (MIDRIS) • A starting point for the establishment of a statewide data system containing information on impaired drivers from the point of issuing a traffic citation in the field through adjudication, intervention, and ultimately compilation of information within the driver history.

  4. What is MIDRIS? • A starting point for the process of design and implementation and / or benchmarking of citation/adjudication components of a state traffic records system. • Although focused upon impaired drivers, these references will also support the larger citation / adjudication planning process.

  5. MIDRIS Development Project • Project Web Site www.nhtsa-tsis.net/MIDRIS • Reference Documents • 1997 Report (3 volumes) • Federal Register entry • List of data elements • Data element details • Example data model • Data element inventory worksheet • MMUCC, NIEM, Citation IEPD, CDLIS

  6. MIDRIS Development Project • Built upon 1997 Federal Report • Built upon Federal Register Guideline • Based upon input from the Traffic Records community • Intended as a starting point for design & development of a state system • NOT a mandate or requirement

  7. Data Dictionary Development Process • Compiled existing standards and guidelines into a database of data elements (data fields) and attributes (code tables). • Hosted a working group in Chicago to set focus, scope, and direction. • Presented initial version at the 2008 Traffic Records Forum.

  8. Data Dictionary Development Process • Solicited input / suggestions from Forum attendees and traffic records community. • Compiled comments & suggestions into an updated data dictionary. • Built some tools to assist in inventorying state systems and to ‘picture’ a potential system.

  9. Data Dictionary Development Process • Presented final (almost) version at the 2009 Traffic Records Forum • Initiated discussions with NIEM Team relative to selecting suitable IEPD’s to support MIDRIS. • Published “final” version of documents at project web site: www.nhtsa-tsis.net/MIDRIS

  10. 07/11/09

  11. 07/11/09

  12. Implementation Issues / Challenges • State system components must exist as comprehensive electronic databases before they can be integrated into a MIDRIS. • Implementation of MIDRIS is not a trivial task, nor an inexpensive one. • The documents and references at the web site are intended, and MUST be treated as starting points for discussions and planning at the state level. NOT as a solution…

  13. Implementation Issues / Challenges • MIDRIS is a prime example of “one size does not fit all.” • Some states may start from scratch. • Some states may elect to integrate existing systems. • Some states may build a central data warehouse containing everyone’s data. • Some states may set up pointer systems with data retained in the owner systems.

  14. Implementation Issues / Challenges • MIDRIS is a prime example of “one size does not fit all.” • A very few states will have everything found in MIDRIS. • Most states will start with what they have and then look toward improving & expanding over time.

  15. Implementation Issues / Challenges • To effectively implement MIDRIS in a state there must be: • A champion • A commitment by data owners to share their data • Top level commitment to the effort • A realistic set of expectations, timelines and budget estimate… • Constant, open communications between stakeholders

  16. Implementation in Your State – Where to Start? Start by taking inventory of existing systems in your state. • What systems are involved? • Who owns the systems? • What data elements are in these systems? • What are the sharing/privacy issues? • What agency will be the likely holder of the impaired driver system?

  17. Citation / Incident Report • Need for electronic systems – timely data is crucial. • Electronic capabilities should be widely available to police officers.

  18. Court System • A unified court system will be easier to integrate than a fragmented system. • Court system must be able to accept and export data electronically to the citation system and driver licensing agency.

  19. Driver Licensing System Must be able to accept electronic dispositions / convictions from the courts!!!!

  20. Treatment Centers • Treatment centers, probation, and community service • Necessary to track if an offender completed the sentence. • Used to track recidivism rates and data on what methods of punishment are most effective.

  21. Getting the Players to “Play” How do we get everyone on board and make this effort a priority? • Discuss how it will benefit each stakeholder. • Not letting offenders “fall through the cracks” cannot be measured.

  22. Where do we go from here? Support efforts currently under discussion: • Outreach effort to inform and educate Region Data Managers about MIDRIS. • Outreach to State staff that are engaged in citation / impaired driving / data warehouse efforts to ensure they know about MIDRIS. • Periodic review of MIDRIS to reflect new issues and developments.

  23. Where do we go from here? Support efforts currently under discussion: • An on-going forum for exchange of information about State efforts in this area. • A review of how MIDRIS might influence the Alcohol Assessment process. • Follow-up with States that have implemented various versions of MIDRIS to document how it impacts Impaired Driver Programs at the State level.

  24. Contact – www.nhtsa-tsis.net/MIDRIS • De Carlo CiccelContract ManagerBehavioral Research DivisionNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration1220 New Jersey Avenue, SE NTI-131Washington, DC  20590 Phone (202) 366-1694FAX:   (202) 366-2766Email: decarlo.ciccel@dot.gov

  25. So – What’s next for your State?

More Related