Evaluating Quality Research in the Digital Era: Strategies for Success
150 likes | 275 Vues
In today's information-saturated world, finding quality research requires careful evaluation of sources. Learn how to differentiate between credible facts, opinions, and narratives through the CARS criteria: Credibility, Accuracy, Reasonableness, and Support. Consider what you're searching for and ensure the information comes from reputable sources. This guide outlines essential steps for selecting high-quality research, emphasizing critical thinking in the digital age. Discover key strategies to sift through vast data and enhance your research effectiveness, whether for learning or informing others.
Evaluating Quality Research in the Digital Era: Strategies for Success
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Finding Quality Research Olds Elementary School October 5, 2010
Evaluate what you locate! Information is everywhere
Exists as: • Fact, Stories, Interpretations, Statistics, Opinion/Advocacy • Exists to: • inform, • persuade, • sell, • present a viewpoint, • create or change an attitude or belief Research
Pre-Evaluation • What are you looking for? • Do you want facts or opinions? • Does it matter that is from an authoritative source or can it be from anyone? • Do you want reasoned arguments, stats, narratives, eyewitness reports, descriptions • Do you want new ideas, to find factual or reasoned support for a positions, to survey opinion? Selecting High Quality Research
CARS C:Credibility A: Accuracy R: Reasonableness S: Support Selecting Reliable Sources
Credibility: What about this source makes it believable (or not)? How does this source know this information? Why should I believe this source over another? TEST: Author’s credentials Information from a well respected organization Information is refereed by editors and others Credibility (Trust)
Accuracy: Information is: • Correct, • Current (is it still of value?), • Detailed, • Exact • Comprehensive TEST: • No date or out of date • Vague or sweeping generalizations, • One sided view that does not acknowledge opposing views Accuracy
Reasonableness: Fairness (opponent's positions should be presented), Objectivity (control personal bias), Moderateness (is this probable?), Consistency (argument does not contradict itself) TEST: • Pay attention to tone – be cautious of highly emotional writing vs reasoned argument; • Awareness of the author’s bias Reasonableness
Support: The source and corroboration of the information Citing sources strengthens credibility TEST: • What sources were used (listed, bibliography), • Is there contact information for author; • Do other sources support this source (confirmability)? Find at least 3 sources that agree • Is this author or article cited elsewhere? Support
Use of databases and reliable websites • Contact the authors ~ have a discussion, “get stuff” How to Research
Select an article of interest • Click on the Google Form link • Evaluate your article against the criteria for quality research Testing CARS
What did you find? Debrief
Have the data come to you • RSS feeds • Google Reader • Delicious • Twitter • http://plpnetwork.com/plp-pregame/plp-pregame-play-5/ Follow Up