1 / 16

Foraminifera and Methane venting

Foraminifera and Methane venting. C ore sampling analyses, Hikurangi Margin, N.Z, SO191. This study tested for discernible imprints on the foraminiferal assemblage and on mineralization of foraminiferal tests from the methane-influenced environment. Hikurangi Margin seep sites.

merle
Télécharger la présentation

Foraminifera and Methane venting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Foraminifera and Methane venting Core sampling analyses, Hikurangi Margin, N.Z, SO191

  2. This study tested for discernible imprints on the foraminiferal assemblage and on mineralization of foraminiferal testsfrom the methane-influenced environment.

  3. Hikurangi Margin seep sites

  4. Geologic setting • Southernmost section of the 3000 km long Tonga–Kermadec–Hikurangisubductionsystem • Pacific plate is subducting beneath the Australian plate • Motion varies greatly: 100 mm/y in Tonga–Kermadec section, 40 mm/y in northern HikurangiMargin, 20 mm/y at southern end • anomalously thick (∼3 km) intricately deformed accretionary wedge • seep sites developed on crests of thrust ridges, underlain by thrust faults that act as conduits for fluids

  5. Methods • RV Sonne cruise 191-3, February-March, 2007 • TV-guided multi-corer • Sampled 7 sites from all three seep areas – Omakere Ridge, Rock Garden, Wairarapa plus one reference site from Omakere Ridge • Isotope analyses included biogenic carbonate (foraminiferal shells, clam shell) and inorganic carbonates (authigenic carbonate recovered from the same cores).

  6. Results Foraminiferal assemblage • 82 species • 16 occurred at all sites • all assemblages dominated by Uvigerinaperegrina • Agglutinate species occurred sparsely in seeps, but constituted 42% of the assemblage in the reference sample.

  7. Results – Foraminiferal density

  8. Results – species richness

  9. Diversity indices

  10. Isotope analyses • Six species • Stanford University Stable Isotope Laboratory on a Finnegan Kiel III carbonate device interfaced with an MAT 252 IRMS • University of Washington Department of Earth and Space Sciences Isotope Laboratory on a ThermoScientific Kiel III carbonate device attached to a Thermo- FinniganDeltaPlus IRMS • NBS 19 standard • Precision • Stanford - 0.05‰ for δ18O and 0.03‰ for δ13C • UW - 0.06‰ for δ18O and 0.03‰ for δ13C

  11. SEM imaging

  12. Isotope analyses C - Wairarapa

  13. Combined isotopes

  14. Conclusions • Assemblage data do not provide definitive mechanism for identifying or characterizing seep and non-seep sites. • Carbon isotope dataare clear in differentiating seep and non-seep cores. • Differences in variability and depletion of δ13C in foraminiferal carbonate appear to be correlated with differences in fluid-flow regimes. • Despite pristine appearance, there is a possibility of early diageneticalteration

  15. Thanks • Thanks to the officers and crew of RV SONNE and the scientific community on board who provided many stimulating discussions. • Funding: BMBF (the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research); Marsden Fund Council for government funding; University of Washington Department of Earth and Space Sciences Graduate Research Award. • David Mucciarone, Stanford University; Andrew Schauer, University of Washington, Ed Hare, Bruce Hayward, and Matthias Haeckel for pore water data.

More Related