1 / 49

Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic Department of Computer Science and Engineering Mälardalen University 2003

PROFESSIONAL ETHICS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CD5590 LECTURE 15. Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic Department of Computer Science and Engineering Mälardalen University 2003. COURSE WRAP-UP. Three Most Fundamental Ethical Principles. Human life Care for children Trust among people. Guest Lectures.

merry
Télécharger la présentation

Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic Department of Computer Science and Engineering Mälardalen University 2003

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PROFESSIONAL ETHICS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CD5590 LECTURE 15 Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic Department of Computer Science and EngineeringMälardalen University2003

  2. COURSE WRAP-UP

  3. Three Most Fundamental Ethical Principles • Human life • Care for children • Trust among people

  4. Guest Lectures

  5. Guest Lecture Peter Funk AI and Ethics

  6. Guest Lecture Peter Funk AI and Ethics • Soft AI – perceived as intelligent, mainstream today • Hard AI – computer can simulate and mimic human brain Ethical perspective: If humans are ethical, then a computer which simulates human intelligence may also be ethical.

  7. Soft AI Questions With Ethical Relevance • “Intelligent” programs with the ability to learn i.e. change their behavior according to circumstances, not under total control of a programmer, built in different products. • Safety critical systems dependent on computers and programs. Airplanes, cars, industry machines, business and administrative systems. • Technical equipment in human body.

  8. Hard AI Questions With Ethical Relevance • Responsibility for robots acts: human producing robots? Robots themselves? • “Robots rights” and responsibilities? (Can only have sense in case robot can act as a responsible being, taking consequences of their deeds, and improving their behavior when necessary.)

  9. The 1940 Laws of Robotics – Isaac Asimov 1. A robot may not injure a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. 2. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. 3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law. .

  10. Hard AI Questions With Ethical Relevance • How to define consciousness? Can (human-like) consciousness arise as a side-effect of (program) complexity? Can artifact be considered as conscious? How to treat conscious artifacts? What happens if robots get intelligence superior to human? Robots outperforming humans? • Research within AI can help us learn more about ourselves and human ways of thinking.

  11. Hard AI Questions With Ethical Relevance • Robots with feelings? • Robot soldiers? • Switching off a robot as a murder? • Cyborg vision – a combination of human and machine • Moving the brain to other, mechanical (?) body

  12. Guest Lecture Kersti Malmsten Medical And Health Care Ethics

  13. Guest Lecture Kersti Malmsten Medical And Health Care Ethics • The Antique Time Greece: ETHIC WAS ABOUT EVERYTHING TRUE = RIGHT = GOODUNTRUE = WRONG = EVIL • Nowadays we have no definitive answers within ethics • Scientists present solutions • Ethicists ask questions

  14. Guest Lecture Kersti Malmsten Medical And Health Care Ethics • Ethics is about values • In health care LIFE is the central value • J P Sartre: • we must make choices • we know we are going to die THAT GIVES US ANXIETY

  15. Love Happiness Justice Safety Reproduction Friends Health Work Mercy Appreciation Trust Guest Lecture Kersti Malmsten Medical And Health Care Ethics What is good? What is the meaning of life? What do you strive for? • Basic pre-conditions: peace, freedom, food, shelter, clothes…

  16. Guest Lecture Kersti Malmsten Medical And Health Care Ethics • Moral problem – the result of a collision between several values • Moral conflict – other people make choices different from our. Dialog is a way of solving a conflict.

  17. Guest Lecture Kersti Malmsten Medical And Health Care Ethics • Moral dilemma – the agent is required to do each of two (or more) actions; the agent can do each of the actions; but the agent cannot do both (or all) of the actions. The agent thus seems condemned to moral failure; no matter what she does, she will do something wrong (or fail to do something that she ought to do).

  18. Guest Lecture Kersti Malmsten Medical And Health Care Ethics • Problem of Utilitarianism: feelings can not be distributed. Feelings are created. • Everyone can do right, but it is difficult to do good. • Aristotle's Distinctions between Theoretical Wisdom, Practical Wisdom and Moral Virtue (Nicomachean Ethics)

  19. Guest Lecture Kersti Malmsten Medical And Health Care Ethics • Theoretical wisdom aims at truth, and is concerned with knowledge of first principles. This kind of theoretical knowledge, Aristotle believes, is of what is necessary and eternal. • Practical wisdom, or phronesis, is also aimed at truth, but truth in the service of action. • Moral virtue is a necessary condition of practical wisdom.

  20. Guest Lecture Kersti Malmsten Medical And Health Care Ethics • Why am I doing the things I am doing? • What am I feeling about the things I am doing? • Why am I thinking the way I am thinking? TRAIN YOUR MORAL COMPETENCE!

  21. autonomy inform persuade threaten force paternalism Guest Lecture Kersti Malmsten Medical And Health Care Ethics Autonomy vs. Paternalism Ethics is both about drawing-up of borderlines and going beyond borderlines.

  22. Guest Lecture Monika Eiborn Nuclear Non-Proliferation

  23. Guest Lecture Monika Eiborn Nuclear Non-Proliferation • Nuclear power is used both for peaceful purposes and for weapons. In Sweden we do not have nuclear weapons, but we have nuclear power plants. • According to Treaty on Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons five nations (USA, Russia, UK, France and China) have right to nuclear weapons. Why those five countries? • What about North Korea, Israel, Iraq, Iran? Do they have nuclear weapons and to what extent?

  24. Guest Lecture Monika Eiborn Nuclear Non-Proliferation • A second nuclear era. More instable states and actors with access to nuclear weapons. During the cold war, the rivalry fought between the United States and the Soviet Union, there were more weapons but the world was more predictable. • Treaty on Non-Proliferation 1970, 189 states have signed, only a few countries have not signed (India, Pakistan, Israel).

  25. Guest Lecture Monika Eiborn Nuclear Non-Proliferation • Other treaties: • The Fissile Material Cut-Off Treaty (a ban on the production of fissile material for nuclear weapons) • The Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty • What are the mechanisms to assure world peace? • How to control both nuclear powers and other countries? • How to enforce disarmament?

  26. Guest Lecture Monika Eiborn Nuclear Non-Proliferation • IAEA is an international agency (created in 1957) which tries to monitor the spread of nuclear technology in the world and to detect and stop countries from developing nuclear weapons. • There is an additional protocol to the Non-proliferation treaty which focus is to strengthen the IAEA’s capability to detect undeclared nuclear material and activities. This means that if a country has signed this additional protocol IAEA can go everywhere in the country to make sure that the amount of nuclear material is what the country has declared it would be.

  27. Guest Lecture Monika Eiborn Nuclear Non-Proliferation • U.S. have started to discuss production and test of small nuclear weapons – mini nukes – to be used to destroy e.g. bunkers. This would be a disaster for the world disarmament and the non-proliferation treaty. This might start the weapon race such as one seen during the cold war. • "The end justifies the means" Nicollo Macchiavelli (The Prince) - rationalization of war

  28. Guest Lecture Monika Eiborn Nuclear Non-Proliferation • Is it ethical to use nuclear power before every nation is able to satisfactorily take care of their waste? Sweden takes care of its own nuclear waste [CLAB interim storage, search for final disposal]. What will happen to all nuclear wastes in the far future? • Is it ethically defensible to export/import (nuclear) wastes? • Is it ethical to use nuclear power before every nation is able to take care of their waste in a reasonably safe manner?

  29. Guest Lecture Monika Eiborn Nuclear Non-Proliferation • SKI is the Swedish nuclear authority dealing with safeguards, export control, physical protection, transport safety and illicit trafficking. SKI handles issues of both technical and political nature. • Office of Nuclear Non-Proliferation ensures that Sweden fulfils the international undertakings entered into by the Swedish Government regarding non-proliferation.

  30. Some Ethical Questions of Nuclear Non-Proliferation Fundamental ethical norms… • Human life • Care for children • Trust among people …are jeopardized when it comes to (nuclear) arms! Peace is the basic precondition for all human progress.

  31. Course Evaluation:What was Good?

  32. Course Outline • “good…the introductory lectures and then guest lectures and discussions…” • Course was logically structured • Course objectives were clearly stated and achieved

  33. The course was interesting and enjoyable • Not too easy to follow (some effort was expected) • Case studies were appreciated

  34. One was encouraged to actively participate during the course • Individual questions were discussed to satisfaction • The lecturer's knowledge of the subject very good

  35. Guest Lectures • Guest lectures were highly appreciated, interesting and informative.

  36. Course in General • You have gained new knowledge about Ethics. • You will recommend the course to others. • You believe the skills learned will help in your professional life. • You can use course materials as a reference.

  37. Course in General • Course web page was useful and well-maintained. • Communication with teacher was very good. • You felt comfortable during the course. • Time frame was good.

  38. Course in General • The course was well worth the time invested. • Your expectations were met.

  39. What can be Improved?

  40. Time Frame • Too little time • Extend the deadline for the paper after Christmas? Comparison: Research Methodology Course eight weeks, Ethics course seven weeks. There is one week difference that can be gained through the extended deadline.

  41. Compulsory Textbook? • MORAL PHILOSOPHY THROUGH THE AGES, James Fieser, Mayfield Publishing Company, 2001 • ETHICS IN ENGINEERING, Mike Martin, Roland Schinzinger, McGraw Hill, 1997 • READINGS IN CYBER ETHICS, R. A. Spinello, H. T. Tavani, Ed., Jones and Bartlett, 2003

  42. Slides • Slides some days before to be able to participate actively in the class?

  43. Guest Lectures • Space for ethical discussions in each guest lecture to engage both teacher and class • Guest lecture medicine/nursing more focused on medical ethics

  44. Case Studies and Beehives • The discussions were very good. (majority) • The discussions were bad, the rest of the course was excellent (one person’s opinion) • Case studies were interesting and instructive (majority) • Case studies were all fake (one person’s opinion) • Maybe reduce the number of case-studies to two?

  45. Research Paper in Ethics • It was very instructive, lots of work done on one's own, much better than exam. (the majority) • It was very difficult, difficult to know what to write about and how (three persons in the class) • Writing of paper should be discussed on a separate lecture in a classroom through “brainstorming”?

  46. Class Notes • Very good idea! Both for student and for teacher. • Should be sent by mail regularly.

  47. Question of the Week? • In order to train skills in critical thinking about ethics issues one could choose one specific topic each week [things going on around us] and discuss it in classroom.

  48. I really think there were too many slides. .. • Yes, I agree! I try to reduce number of slides. • I shall try to combine PowerPoint with more white-board.

  49. Students Too Perhaps?  • “I do four courses at the same time now and I need the points of all of them except this one for my exam. Because of that this course was priority #4 to me, but it was the one that had me most interested. This is a compliment good enough. :-)” THANK YOU!

More Related